DoD's $24.3M Consulting Contract with Kennell & Associates: A Cost-Plus Award Fee Analysis

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,342,640 ($24.3M)

Contractor: Kennell & Associates Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-08-01

End Date: 2013-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,886 days

Daily Burn Rate: $12.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: POLICY&STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SERVICES TAS::21 2020::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22042

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.3 million to KENNELL & ASSOCIATES INC for work described as: POLICY&STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SERVICES TAS::21 2020::TAS Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Kennell & Associates Inc. for policy and statistical analysis services totaled $24.3 million. 2. Awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources', the contract type was Cost Plus Award Fee. 3. The contract duration was 1886 days, spanning from August 1, 2008, to September 30, 2013. 4. The agency responsible was the Defense Contract Management Agency, part of the Department of Defense. 5. The NAICS code 541690 indicates 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure incentivizes performance but can lead to higher costs if award fees are consistently high. Without specific award fee data, it's difficult to definitively assess value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' suggests an initial broad competition, but the exclusion of specific sources might limit the competitive landscape. This method can impact price discovery if fewer bidders participate.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for consulting services. The effectiveness of the competition and the final negotiated price determine the overall taxpayer impact.

Public Impact

Government agencies rely on specialized consulting services for policy and statistical analysis to inform decision-making. The significant contract value indicates a substantial need for these services within the Department of Defense. The duration of the contract suggests a long-term requirement for the services provided. The specific nature of 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' implies a focus on specialized expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns with CPAF if award fees are not carefully managed.
  • Limited transparency on the 'exclusion of sources' could mask reduced competition.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through a form of open competition.
  • Services provided are crucial for defense policy and statistical analysis.
  • Contract managed by a specialized agency (DCMA).

Sector Analysis

The Department of Defense frequently procures scientific and technical consulting services. Benchmarks for similar contracts in 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' (NAICS 541690) would be needed for a precise comparison.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) is responsible for overseeing defense contracts. The effectiveness of their oversight in managing the CPAF structure and ensuring value for money is key.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Award Fee contracts can be susceptible to cost growth if not managed diligently.
  • The 'exclusion of sources' clause warrants further investigation into the competitive landscape.
  • Lack of detailed performance data makes it difficult to confirm contractor value.
  • The significant duration and cost suggest a critical need, but the specific impact of the services is not detailed.

Tags

other-scientific-and-technical-consultin, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.3 million to KENNELL & ASSOCIATES INC. POLICY&STATISTICAL ANALYSIS SERVICES TAS::21 2020::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KENNELL & ASSOCIATES INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-08-01. End: 2013-09-30.

What was the average award fee paid to Kennell & Associates Inc. under this contract, and how did it compare to the target fee?

The provided data does not specify the award fees paid. To assess the value, an analysis of the actual award fees disbursed against the potential award fee pool is necessary. This would reveal if the contractor consistently met or exceeded performance expectations, justifying the 'award' portion of the contract.

What specific sources were excluded from the competition, and what was the justification for their exclusion?

The data states 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' but does not detail which sources were excluded or the rationale. Understanding this is crucial for assessing the true level of competition and whether the exclusion potentially limited price discovery or led to a less optimal outcome for the government.

How did the final cost of this contract compare to the estimated cost, and what factors contributed to any variance?

As a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract, the final cost is composed of the actual costs incurred plus any award fees. Without knowing the initial cost estimates and the breakdown of incurred costs versus award fees, it's impossible to determine the variance or the factors driving it. This information is vital for a complete value assessment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W81XWH08R0004

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3120 FAIRVIEW PARK DR STE 220, FALLS CHURCH, VA, 22042

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,342,640

Exercised Options: $24,342,640

Current Obligation: $24,342,640

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-08-01

Current End Date: 2013-09-30

Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-04-27

More Contracts from Kennell & Associates Inc

View all Kennell & Associates Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending