DoD's Army Awards $15.4M Clinical PIO Support Contract to Guidehouse LLP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $15,380,156 ($15.4M)

Contractor: Guidehouse LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-04-30

End Date: 2012-10-29

Contract Duration: 2,009 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: BASE YEAR BRAC CLINICAL PIO SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: FALLS CHURCH, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22041

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $15.4 million to GUIDEHOUSE LLP for work described as: BASE YEAR BRAC CLINICAL PIO SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Guidehouse LLP for clinical PIO support. 2. Spending spans 5 years, from 2007 to 2012. 3. The contract falls under Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 4. This award represents a significant investment in healthcare support services for the Department of Defense.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value of $15.4 million over five years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific per-unit cost data or benchmarks for similar clinical support services, a precise value assessment is difficult. However, the Time and Materials pricing structure can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows for a wide range of potential contractors to participate, theoretically leading to better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that aims to secure services at the best possible price. However, the Time and Materials contract type warrants careful oversight to ensure costs remain controlled and justified.

Public Impact

Ensures continuity of clinical information operations support. Supports Department of Defense healthcare initiatives. Potential impact on patient care through efficient information management. Contributes to the operational readiness of military medical facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Time and Materials pricing structure can inflate costs.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics makes value assessment challenging.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition utilized.
  • Long-term contract provides stability for support services.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare sector, particularly within the Department of Defense, requires specialized administrative and management consulting services for clinical operations. Benchmarks for similar contracts are highly variable due to the unique nature of military healthcare and the specific services provided.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication in the provided data whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or prime contractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation in this contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract's duration and value suggest a need for consistent oversight to manage costs, ensure performance, and verify that the services provided align with the Department of Defense's strategic objectives. Delivery orders under this contract require diligent review.

Related Government Programs

  • Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics.
  • Limited insight into specific services rendered.
  • No clear indication of small business utilization.

Tags

administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $15.4 million to GUIDEHOUSE LLP. BASE YEAR BRAC CLINICAL PIO SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GUIDEHOUSE LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $15.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-04-30. End: 2012-10-29.

What specific clinical information operations support was provided under this contract, and how did it directly contribute to the Army's mission?

The contract provided administrative management and general management consulting services focused on clinical information operations. This likely encompassed areas such as system implementation, process improvement, data management, and user support for clinical IT systems within Army medical facilities. The direct contribution would be enhanced efficiency, better data accuracy, and improved functionality of critical healthcare IT infrastructure, ultimately supporting patient care and operational readiness.

Given the Time and Materials pricing, what mechanisms were in place to control costs and prevent overruns during the contract period?

While the data specifies a Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure, it does not detail the specific cost control mechanisms employed. Typically, government contracts with T&M pricing include clauses for labor hour limitations, fixed-fee components for certain tasks, detailed reporting requirements, and robust oversight by contracting officers to monitor expenditures and ensure fair and reasonable pricing. Regular audits and performance reviews would also be crucial.

How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the government received the best value for these specialized consulting services?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids and achieving best value. The effectiveness in this specific case depends on the clarity of the solicitation, the evaluation criteria used, and the number and quality of proposals received. Without access to the solicitation details and the competitive landscape at the time of award, it's difficult to definitively assess the 'best value' outcome beyond the procedural fairness of the competition.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (UEI: 001863794)

Address: 1800 TYSONS BLVD 6TH FL, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $15,380,156

Exercised Options: $15,380,156

Current Obligation: $15,380,156

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0466N

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2007-04-30

Current End Date: 2012-10-29

Potential End Date: 2012-10-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-04-29

More Contracts from Guidehouse LLP

View all Guidehouse LLP federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending