DoD's $307.5M RAND FFRDC Contract: All Other Professional Services Lacked Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $307,540,447 ($307.5M)

Contractor: THE Rand Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-12-05

End Date: 2016-05-30

Contract Duration: 3,829 days

Daily Burn Rate: $80.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FFRDC RAND NDRI

Place of Performance

Location: SANTA MONICA, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 90401

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $307.5 million to THE RAND CORPORATION for work described as: FFRDC RAND NDRI Key points: 1. Significant spending on 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' ($307.5M) raises questions about category definition. 2. The contract was not competed, indicating a lack of market research or a specific justification for sole-sourcing. 3. RAND Corporation, a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC), is the sole awardee, suggesting a unique capability or relationship. 4. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can incentivize cost overruns if not managed tightly.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $307.5M award value is substantial for a 'not competed' contract in a broad service category. Benchmarking is difficult without clearer service definitions and competitive data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was 'NOT COMPETED' and awarded as a 'DEFINITIVE CONTRACT' to RAND Corporation. This sole-source approach limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs compared to a competitive environment.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are committed without exploring potentially more cost-effective solutions through competition.

Public Impact

Lack of competition may mean taxpayers are not getting the best value for these professional services. The broad 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category makes it difficult to assess the specific value and necessity of the work performed. FFRDCs are intended to provide objective advice; however, sole-source contracts can raise concerns about potential bias or lack of external validation. Long contract duration (2005-2016) suggests ongoing reliance on this specific provider.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Broad service category
  • Cost-plus contract type

Positive Signals

  • Award to FFRDC implies specialized, high-level expertise
  • Long-term relationship suggests consistent need and performance

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under professional, scientific, and technical services, a broad category. Spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to the 'All Other' classification and lack of competition, but FFRDC contracts are typically substantial.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). This contract likely involves large-scale, specialized services not typically subcontracted to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants further oversight to ensure the justification for sole-sourcing was robust and that the contract terms provided adequate value and accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of Competition
  • Broad Service Category
  • Potential for Cost Overruns (CPFF)
  • Limited Transparency on Specific Services
  • No Small Business Participation

Tags

all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-defense, ca, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $307.5 million to THE RAND CORPORATION. FFRDC RAND NDRI

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE RAND CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $307.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-12-05. End: 2016-05-30.

What specific services were procured under 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' to justify a $307.5M sole-source award?

The contract details do not specify the exact services. 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' is a broad NAICS code (541990) encompassing a wide range of activities. Without further documentation, it's impossible to determine the specific nature of the work performed for the Department of the Army by RAND Corporation under this large, non-competed contract.

What risks are associated with a sole-source, cost-plus fixed fee contract for FFRDC services?

Sole-source contracts eliminate competitive pressure, potentially leading to higher prices and reduced innovation. Cost-plus fixed fee contracts can incentivize contractors to increase costs to maximize their fee, especially if the fixed fee is a percentage of costs. This combination requires stringent oversight to ensure cost control and value for taxpayer money.

How effective was this contract in meeting the Department of the Army's needs given the lack of competition?

Effectiveness cannot be definitively assessed without knowing the specific outcomes and deliverables. However, the lack of competition raises concerns about whether alternative, potentially more cost-effective solutions were overlooked. The long duration suggests a sustained need, but the absence of competitive benchmarking makes it difficult to gauge optimal performance and value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesOther Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesAll Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Product/Service Code: SPECIAL STUDIES/ANALYSIS, NOT R&DSPECIAL STUDIES - NOT R and D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W74V8H05R0050

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1776 MAIN ST, SANTA MONICA, CA, 90401

Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $309,969,532

Exercised Options: $309,969,532

Current Obligation: $307,540,447

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-12-05

Current End Date: 2016-05-30

Potential End Date: 2016-05-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-02-03

More Contracts from THE Rand Corporation

View all THE Rand Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending