DoD spent $462.8M on 'All Other Professional Services' via sole-source contract from 2008-2013
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $462,839,271 ($462.8M)
Contractor: Institute for Defense Analyses
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-08-01
End Date: 2013-09-30
Contract Duration: 2,982 days
Daily Burn Rate: $155.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FISCAL YEAR 10/01/2008/ THRU 9/30/2013
Place of Performance
Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22311
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $462.8 million to INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES for work described as: FISCAL YEAR 10/01/2008/ THRU 9/30/2013 Key points: 1. Significant spending on a broad service category suggests potential for unoptimized costs. 2. Sole-source award limits price discovery and competitive pressure. 3. The contract duration of nearly 8 years raises questions about adaptability and ongoing need. 4. Lack of small business participation is noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The total award of $462.8M over five years for 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' is substantial. Without competitive benchmarks or detailed cost breakdowns, assessing value is difficult. The fixed fee component provides some cost control, but the overall cost-effectiveness is uncertain.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no competition. This significantly limits the government's ability to ensure the best possible price through market forces and negotiation.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely resulted in higher costs for taxpayers than if the contract had been competitively bid.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competitive bidding. The broad nature of 'All Other Professional Services' makes it difficult for the public to understand the specific value received. Long contract durations can lead to inertia and resistance to adopting more efficient solutions.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Broad service category
- Long contract duration
- No small business participation
Positive Signals
- Fixed fee component provides some cost certainty
Sector Analysis
The 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' category is broad and often used for specialized needs. Spending benchmarks are difficult to establish due to its heterogeneity. The Department of Defense's reliance on such services is common for complex research and analysis.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This is a missed opportunity to foster small business growth and potentially leverage innovative solutions they may offer.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this contract warrants scrutiny regarding the justification for not seeking competition. Oversight should focus on whether the fixed fee structure adequately controlled costs over the contract's long duration.
Related Government Programs
- All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Broad and potentially undefined scope of services
- Long contract duration without clear re-competition points
- No small business participation
Tags
all-other-professional-scientific-and-te, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 100m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $462.8 million to INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES. FISCAL YEAR 10/01/2008/ THRU 9/30/2013
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $462.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-08-01. End: 2013-09-30.
What specific services were procured under 'All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services' to justify a sole-source award of this magnitude?
The specific services procured under this broad category are not detailed in the provided data. Typically, this classification encompasses a wide range of specialized scientific, technical, and professional support not covered by more specific NAICS codes. Justification for a sole-source award would likely involve unique capabilities, proprietary knowledge, or critical national security requirements possessed exclusively by the contractor, Institute for Defense Analyses.
How was the fixed fee determined, and what mechanisms were in place to ensure it represented fair market value without competition?
The determination of the fixed fee would typically involve detailed cost proposals from the contractor, followed by negotiation with the contracting agency. Without competition, the government relies heavily on its ability to audit costs and negotiate a reasonable profit margin. Mechanisms might include historical cost data, industry standards for similar services, and robust cost analysis by the Defense Contract Management Agency to validate the contractor's proposed costs.
What was the process for evaluating the ongoing necessity and performance of the Institute for Defense Analyses' services throughout the nearly 8-year contract period?
Oversight throughout the contract's duration would involve regular performance reviews, milestone tracking, and potentially periodic re-evaluations of the contract's necessity and scope. The contracting officer and technical monitors would be responsible for ensuring the contractor met performance standards and that the services remained aligned with evolving DoD requirements. However, the long duration and sole-source nature could reduce the impetus for proactive re-evaluation compared to a competitive contract.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › All Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4850 MARK CENTER DRIVE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22311
Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $1,789,636,975
Exercised Options: $462,839,271
Current Obligation: $462,839,271
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-08-01
Current End Date: 2013-09-30
Potential End Date: 2013-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2018-02-02
More Contracts from Institute for Defense Analyses
- Adminstrative Contract — $661.1M (Department of Defense)
- H91268-8262-0001-000 — $424.5M (Department of Defense)
- IDA Ffrdc IS to Provide Research and Analysis Support to the OSD, the Joint Staff/Combatant Commands, Defense Agencies, Joint Program Offices, and Other Users AS Specified in the Sponsoring Agreement Between OSD and the Ffrdc — $361.3M (Department of Defense)
- Award of a Contract on a Sole Source Basis to the Institute for Defense Analyses (IDA), a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (ffrdc). the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD), the Joint Staff/Combatant Commands, Defense Agencies, Joint Program Offices, and Other Users of the Ffrdc Have a Continuing Need for the IDA Ffrdc Study and Analysis Requirements. IDA IS to Provide Research and Analysis to the OSD, the Joint Staff/Combatant Commands, Defense Agencies, Joint Program Offices, and Other Users AS Specified in the Sponsoring Agreement Between OSD and IDA Under the Ffrdc — $296.9M (Department of Defense)
- Project Number BB-6-3681 — $281.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)