DoD's $45.1M Construction Contract Awarded to Undisclosed Domestic Firms Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $45,120,636 ($45.1M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-02-14

End Date: 2013-12-16

Contract Duration: 671 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: ANA 3/207 GARRISON

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $45.1 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: ANA 3/207 GARRISON Key points: 1. The contract value of $45.1 million is significant for commercial building construction. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The award to undisclosed domestic awardees raises questions about transparency and potential for future scrutiny. 4. The construction sector is a major area of government spending, with varying levels of efficiency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $45.1 million for construction services needs to be benchmarked against similar projects to assess its fairness. Without specific details on the scope of work and the awardee's qualifications, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were allowed to submit proposals. This method generally promotes price discovery and competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition aims to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment for contract awards.

Public Impact

Transparency concerns arise due to the undisclosed identities of the domestic awardees. The significant contract value highlights the substantial investment in infrastructure and construction by the Department of Defense. The duration of the contract (671 days) suggests a complex project requiring substantial resources and oversight.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Undisclosed awardees limit transparency and accountability.
Lack of specific project details hinders value assessment.
Potential for cost overruns in long-term construction projects.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Significant contract value may indicate a substantial project.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant area of government expenditure. Benchmarks for similar DoD construction projects would be necessary for a comprehensive value analysis.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small businesses were not explicitly involved in this award, as the 'sb' field is false and awardees are undisclosed. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The use of full and open competition is a positive oversight mechanism. However, the lack of disclosed awardee identities presents a gap in accountability and public scrutiny.

Related Government Programs

Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Awardee identity not disclosed, impacting transparency.
Scope of work and specific deliverables are not detailed.
Potential for cost escalation in long-duration construction contracts.
No clear indication of small business participation.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $45.1 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). ANA 3/207 GARRISON

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $45.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-02-14. End: 2013-12-16.

What specific construction services were procured under this $45.1 million contract, and how does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar services?

The provided data does not specify the exact construction services. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of the scope of work (e.g., new construction, renovation, specific building types) is required. This information, alongside market research on prevailing rates for comparable projects in the same geographic region, would allow for a robust price comparison and determination of whether the $45.1 million represents a fair and reasonable price.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large construction contract to undisclosed domestic entities, particularly regarding performance and accountability?

Awarding to undisclosed entities poses risks to performance and accountability. Without public knowledge of the awardees, it is harder for oversight bodies and the public to track their performance, identify potential conflicts of interest, or ensure compliance with contract terms. This lack of transparency can obscure potential issues like financial instability, past performance problems, or inadequate safety records, which could lead to project delays, cost overruns, or subpar quality.

How effectively does the 'full and open competition' method ensure optimal resource allocation and value for taxpayer money in large-scale construction projects like this one?

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging a wide range of qualified contractors to bid, thereby driving down prices and fostering innovation. For large construction projects, this method can be highly effective if the solicitation is well-defined and the evaluation criteria are clear and objective. It increases the likelihood of selecting the best value proposal, balancing cost with technical merit and past performance, ultimately aiming for efficient use of taxpayer funds.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W5J9LE12B0003

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $45,120,636

Exercised Options: $45,120,636

Current Obligation: $45,120,636

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline