DoD's $50M Commercial Building Construction Contract Awarded to Undisclosed Domestic Firms
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $49,860,601 ($49.9M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-09-27
End Date: 2013-07-23
Contract Duration: 665 days
Daily Burn Rate: $75.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: ANA 4/205TH BRIGADE GARRISON, TARIN KOWT
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $49.9 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: ANA 4/205TH BRIGADE GARRISON, TARIN KOWT Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $49.86M for building construction. 2. Competition method was 'Full and Open', suggesting broad market access. 3. Risk of undisclosed awardees could obscure performance and accountability. 4. Construction sector spending is substantial and critical for infrastructure.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $49.86M is substantial. Without knowing the specific scope of work and comparing it to similar construction projects, it's difficult to definitively assess its value. The 'undisclosed' nature of the awardees adds a layer of uncertainty.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition', which is generally positive for price discovery. However, the fact that the awardees are undisclosed raises concerns about transparency and the ability to verify fair pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is intended to benefit taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment. However, the lack of transparency regarding the awardees may limit the ability to fully realize these benefits.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may not know which companies are receiving significant federal construction funds. Lack of transparency could hinder public trust in the contracting process. Potential for reduced accountability if awardee performance is not publicly visible.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Undisclosed awardees
- Lack of transparency in awardee identification
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition utilized
- Significant investment in infrastructure
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the economy. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure development and maintenance, with benchmarks varying widely based on project scope and location.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not explicitly involved or prioritized in this award, as the 'sb' field is false and no specific small business set-aside is mentioned. Further analysis would be needed to confirm if any small businesses participated as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'undisclosed awardees' aspect presents a potential oversight challenge. Ensuring accountability and performance monitoring is more difficult when the identity of the primary contractors is not publicly available.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of transparency regarding awardees
- Potential for reduced accountability
- Difficulty in verifying fair pricing and value
- Limited insight into contractor performance
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $49.9 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). ANA 4/205TH BRIGADE GARRISON, TARIN KOWT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $49.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-09-27. End: 2013-07-23.
What specific construction services were procured under this $49.86M contract, and how does the pricing compare to industry standards for similar projects?
The provided data does not detail the specific construction services. To assess value, a comparison of the contract's scope of work against market rates for similar projects, considering location, complexity, and materials, would be necessary. The undisclosed nature of the awardees complicates this assessment.
What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large construction contract to undisclosed domestic entities?
The primary risk is a lack of transparency and accountability. Without knowing the awardees, it's harder to vet their past performance, financial stability, and compliance records. This opacity could potentially mask issues related to quality, timeliness, or even ethical concerns, impacting taxpayer interests.
How effective was the 'Full and Open Competition' in ensuring the best value for taxpayers, given the undisclosed awardees?
While 'Full and Open Competition' theoretically maximizes opportunities and promotes competitive pricing, the undisclosed awardees obscure the effectiveness. It's unclear if the most capable and cost-effective vendors were truly selected and if the government received optimal value without public scrutiny of the chosen entities.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W5J9LE11B0007
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $49,860,601
Exercised Options: $49,860,601
Current Obligation: $49,860,601
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-09-27
Current End Date: 2013-07-23
Potential End Date: 2013-07-23 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-21
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)