DoD's $18.8M KANDAKS (WEST) CAMP HERO contract awarded to undisclosed domestic firms

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,806,551 ($18.8M)

Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-08-30

End Date: 2013-11-05

Contract Duration: 798 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: KANDAKS (WEST) CAMP HERO

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: KANDAKS (WEST) CAMP HERO Key points: 1. The contract value of $18.8 million for construction services appears reasonable given the duration and scope. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. 4. Performance occurred between 2011 and 2013, providing historical context for current market rates. 5. The award falls under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction, a broad category. 6. The absence of specific details on awardees limits a direct assessment of contractor experience.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $18.8 million contract is challenging without specific details on the scope of work and the exact nature of the construction. However, for a definitive contract awarded in 2011 for a duration of 798 days, the price point is within a plausible range for large-scale construction projects. The firm fixed-price nature indicates that the government secured a set price, but the ultimate value depends on the quality and timeliness of the delivered construction.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This suggests a robust bidding environment, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable pricing for the government. The presence of 8 bids (no: 8) further supports the notion of a competitive process, although the specific number of bidders does not inherently guarantee the best possible outcome without knowing the quality of the bids submitted.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a market where contractors compete on price and performance, driving down costs and improving service delivery.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military personnel and their families who would utilize the facilities constructed under this contract. The contract delivered construction services, contributing to the modernization or expansion of military infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the KANDAKS (WEST) CAMP HERO site, likely a military installation. The contract supported the construction workforce, including laborers, tradespeople, and project managers.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific awardee information hinders assessment of past performance and potential risks.
The broad nature of 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' makes it difficult to pinpoint specific value-for-money concerns without detailed project specifications.
The contract duration of 798 days (over two years) could introduce risks related to material cost fluctuations or unforeseen site conditions.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
Firm Fixed Price contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor.
The contract was completed, indicating successful delivery of construction services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. This sector is characterized by a wide range of project sizes and complexities, from small renovations to large-scale facility development. Federal spending in construction is substantial, supporting military bases, government buildings, and infrastructure projects. The market typically involves numerous contractors, with varying degrees of specialization and capacity. Benchmarking this $18.8 million contract would involve comparing it to similar military construction projects of comparable scale and complexity awarded around the same period.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside (sb: false). Without further information on subcontracting plans or actual subcontracting awards, it is difficult to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem. Typically, large construction contracts offer opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors, but this is not guaranteed without explicit requirements or oversight.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Department of the Army, likely through contracting officers and project managers responsible for ensuring compliance with contract terms and quality standards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigations of fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is limited by the undisclosed awardees, but the contract award itself and its basic terms are publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) projects
Department of Defense Facilities Management
General Services Administration (GSA) Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Undisclosed Awardees
Potential for Cost Overruns (inherent in long-term construction)
Scope Definition Ambiguity (due to broad NAICS code)

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). KANDAKS (WEST) CAMP HERO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-08-30. End: 2013-11-05.

What specific construction services were delivered under the KANDAKS (WEST) CAMP HERO contract?

The contract falls under the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220, which covers Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. This broad category typically includes the construction of non-residential buildings such as office buildings, warehouses, industrial facilities, and public buildings. Without more specific contract line item details or a Statement of Work (SOW), it is impossible to determine the exact nature of the construction. However, given the context of 'CAMP HERO,' it is highly probable that the project involved the construction or renovation of facilities essential for military operations or personnel support at that specific installation.

How does the $18.8 million contract value compare to similar construction projects for the Department of Defense during the 2011-2013 period?

Comparing the $18.8 million value requires context regarding the scope and complexity of the construction. For the period of 2011-2013, the Department of Defense awarded numerous construction contracts. Projects could range from barracks and training facilities to administrative buildings and infrastructure upgrades. A contract of this value would typically represent a significant construction undertaking, possibly a new building or a substantial renovation. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable projects based on factors like square footage, type of facility (e.g., barracks vs. specialized training facility), location, and specific construction requirements. Publicly available contract databases can be queried for similar projects to establish a range of costs per square foot or per project for similar types of military construction during that timeframe.

What are the potential risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for a construction project of this magnitude and duration?

A Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract shifts the majority of cost risk to the contractor. For a construction project valued at $18.8 million and spanning 798 days (over two years), potential risks for the contractor include unforeseen increases in material costs, labor shortages, unexpected site conditions (e.g., soil issues, hazardous materials), or design changes. If these risks materialize and are not covered by contract clauses for equitable adjustments, the contractor could face significant financial losses, potentially impacting their ability to complete the project or leading to disputes. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor might cut corners on quality to maintain profitability, or that the initial price, while fixed, was inflated due to the contractor pricing in a high contingency for these risks.

What does the 'full and open competition' designation imply about the contractor selection process and potential value for taxpayers?

The 'full and open competition' designation signifies that the Department of the Army sought bids from all responsible sources, without restrictions on the number of participants. This is generally considered the most effective method for achieving competitive pricing and ensuring that the government receives the best value. It implies that multiple companies had the opportunity to bid, and the contract was likely awarded to the offeror that represented the best value (considering price, technical qualifications, past performance, etc.). For taxpayers, this process is beneficial as it encourages competition, which tends to drive down prices and foster innovation among contractors vying for the work. The presence of 8 bids further supports the idea that the competition was robust.

Given the contract was awarded in 2011 and completed in 2013, how might current market conditions and construction costs differ?

Construction costs and market conditions have likely changed significantly since the 2011-2013 period. Factors such as inflation, supply chain disruptions (particularly evident in recent years), labor availability and wages, and demand for construction services all influence current pricing. Materials like lumber, steel, and concrete have experienced price volatility. Labor costs may have increased due to demand and wage pressures. Therefore, a similar construction project undertaken today would likely command a higher price than this $18.8 million contract. This historical data point serves as a baseline, but direct comparisons to current projects must account for these macroeconomic shifts and sector-specific trends.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W5J9LE11B0006

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,918,965

Exercised Options: $18,806,551

Current Obligation: $18,806,551

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline