DoD's $74.8M Construction Contract for 215th Brigade Garrison Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $74,819,008 ($74.8M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-06-30
End Date: 2015-05-08
Contract Duration: 1,408 days
Daily Burn Rate: $53.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: 215TH BIRGADE GARRISON, DELARAM
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $74.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: 215TH BIRGADE GARRISON, DELARAM Key points: 1. The contract value of $74.8M falls within typical ranges for large-scale construction projects. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The project duration of 1408 days indicates a significant, long-term construction effort. 4. The lack of specific awardee information limits detailed competitive analysis.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $74.8M for a brigade garrison construction project is substantial. Without specific details on the scope of work and comparable projects, a precise pricing assessment is difficult. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to control costs.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically allows for the widest possible range of bidders and promotes price discovery. This method is generally expected to yield competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is a positive indicator for taxpayer value, as it encourages multiple bids and potentially drives down costs.
Public Impact
Construction of military facilities impacts local economies through job creation and material sourcing. The project's duration suggests a long-term commitment to infrastructure development. The undisclosed domestic awardees limit transparency regarding the specific companies benefiting from the contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific awardee information hinders transparency.
- Project duration is lengthy, increasing potential for cost overruns or delays.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition.
- Firm fixed-price contract type.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector for the Department of Defense can vary significantly based on global security needs and infrastructure modernization efforts.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of a definitive contract and full and open competition suggests a structured procurement process. However, the lack of disclosed awardees warrants further oversight to ensure accountability and transparency.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of specific awardee information.
- Long project duration.
- Limited detail on scope of work.
- Potential for cost escalation over a long project timeline.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $74.8 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). 215TH BIRGADE GARRISON, DELARAM
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $74.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-06-30. End: 2015-05-08.
What was the specific scope of work for the 215th Brigade Garrison construction, and how did it compare to similar projects in terms of cost-effectiveness?
The provided data lacks specific details on the scope of work for the 215th Brigade Garrison construction. To assess cost-effectiveness, a detailed comparison with similar military construction projects, considering factors like square footage, facility type, and location, would be necessary. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a defined budget, but actual value depends on the execution and final deliverables.
What are the potential risks associated with a 1408-day construction project, and how were they mitigated?
A project duration of 1408 days (nearly four years) presents risks such as material cost fluctuations, labor availability issues, design changes, and potential delays due to unforeseen circumstances. Mitigation strategies could include robust contract clauses for change management, escalation clauses for materials, and strong project management oversight to ensure adherence to schedule and budget.
How effectively did the full and open competition process ensure the best value for taxpayers on this $74.8M contract?
Full and open competition is designed to maximize the number of bidders, thereby fostering a competitive environment that should lead to better pricing for taxpayers. However, the ultimate effectiveness depends on the quality and number of bids received, the clarity of the solicitation, and the evaluation criteria used. Without knowing the number of bids or the winning bid's relation to the government estimate, a definitive assessment of value is challenging.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID
Solicitation ID: W5J9LE11B0002
Offers Received: 5
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $74,819,008
Exercised Options: $74,819,008
Current Obligation: $74,819,008
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-06-30
Current End Date: 2015-05-08
Potential End Date: 2015-05-08 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-21
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)