DoD's $23.9M Weesh-Chaman Border Control Point Contract Awarded to Undisclosed Foreign Entities
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $23,910,313 ($23.9M)
Contractor: Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-05-02
End Date: 2013-11-26
Contract Duration: 939 days
Daily Burn Rate: $25.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: WEESH-CHAMAN BORDER CONTROL POINT
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $23.9 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: WEESH-CHAMAN BORDER CONTROL POINT Key points: 1. Significant spending on border infrastructure, potentially impacting national security. 2. Lack of transparency regarding foreign awardees raises concerns about accountability and value. 3. Construction sector spending, with potential for cost overruns in complex environments. 4. Contract duration of over two years suggests a substantial project scope.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $23.9 million for construction is difficult to benchmark without knowing the specific scope and location. The lack of disclosed foreign awardees prevents a direct comparison to similar domestic contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
While advertised as full and open competition, the undisclosed foreign awardees obscure the competitive landscape and the true price discovery process. It's unclear if domestic firms were effectively excluded or unable to compete.
Taxpayer Impact: The use of taxpayer funds for a project with undisclosed foreign contractors raises questions about the efficient allocation of resources and potential risks to national interests.
Public Impact
Potential security vulnerabilities at a border crossing due to the nature of the construction. Questions about the use of U.S. taxpayer funds for projects awarded to foreign entities without transparency. Impact on domestic construction firms that may have been capable of undertaking this project.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of transparency in awardee identification.
- Potential national security risks associated with foreign involvement in border infrastructure.
- Uncertainty regarding the value and oversight of funds allocated.
- Limited insight into the competitive process and pricing.
Positive Signals
- Project addresses critical border infrastructure needs.
- Contract was awarded under a full and open competition framework.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on project complexity, location, and geopolitical factors. The $23.9 million value is moderate for a significant infrastructure project.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation was not a stated requirement or outcome for this contract, as 'sb' is false and 'st' is empty. This suggests the contract was likely awarded to larger entities, potentially excluding small businesses.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight is a significant concern due to the undisclosed foreign awardees. The Department of Defense and Department of the Army are responsible, but the lack of transparency hinders effective accountability and assessment of performance and value.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of transparency regarding awardee identity.
- Potential national security risks.
- Uncertainty of value for taxpayer money.
- Limited insight into competitive pricing.
- Geopolitical sensitivities of the border location.
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $23.9 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). WEESH-CHAMAN BORDER CONTROL POINT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $23.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-05-02. End: 2013-11-26.
What specific security protocols and vetting processes were applied to the undisclosed foreign awardees to mitigate risks associated with border infrastructure construction?
The provided data does not contain information regarding the specific security protocols or vetting processes applied to the undisclosed foreign awardees. This lack of detail is a critical gap, especially for a border control point project, and prevents an assessment of potential national security risks.
How does the Department of Defense ensure fair market value and prevent potential overpricing when awarding significant construction contracts to foreign entities without public disclosure?
Ensuring fair market value without public disclosure is challenging. While the contract was 'full and open,' the lack of transparency on awardees and their pricing structures makes it difficult to ascertain if competitive pressures effectively drove down costs. Further investigation into the procurement process is needed.
What is the long-term strategic benefit and operational impact of constructing the Weesh-Chaman Border Control Point with undisclosed foreign contractors?
The long-term strategic benefit and operational impact are unclear without knowing the specific capabilities and intentions of the foreign awardees. Transparency is crucial for understanding how this infrastructure contributes to border security objectives and whether it aligns with U.S. strategic interests.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W5J9LE11R0018
Offers Received: 13
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $23,910,313
Exercised Options: $23,910,313
Current Obligation: $23,910,313
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-05-02
Current End Date: 2013-11-26
Potential End Date: 2013-11-26 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-08-21
More Contracts from Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)
- Supply of Fuel to Various Locations in Afghanistan — $889.5M (Department of Defense)
- A-Temp ANP Award — $444.1M (Department of Defense)
- Supply of Fuel to Bagram AIR Field, Afghanistant — $289.5M (Department of Defense)
- Delivery of Fuel in Afghanistan — $237.0M (Department of Defense)
- Turbine Fuel for Forward Operating Base (FOB) Sharana — $204.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)