DoD Awards $17.8M for Perimeter Fence and Guard Towers, Facing Foreign Awardee Concerns

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,765,671 ($17.8M)

Contractor: Foreign Awardees (undisclosed)

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-25

End Date: 2012-10-13

Contract Duration: 749 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 36

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: SHINAND PERIMETER FENCE & GUARD TOWERS

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: SHINAND PERIMETER FENCE & GUARD TOWERS Key points: 1. The contract for perimeter fencing and guard towers was awarded for $17.8 million. 2. Concerns exist regarding foreign awardees, with details undisclosed. 3. The contract falls under the 'Construction' sector. 4. A significant portion of the contract value was awarded, with $17.7 million obligated. 5. The contract was awarded under full and open competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $17.8 million for perimeter fencing and guard towers appears reasonable given the scope. However, the lack of transparency regarding foreign awardees makes a precise pricing assessment difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, which generally promotes competitive pricing. However, the undisclosed foreign awardees introduce uncertainty about the true price discovery and potential risks.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be impacted by potential risks associated with undisclosed foreign awardees, despite the competitive award process.

Public Impact

Security infrastructure upgrades at a Department of Defense site. Potential implications for national security due to foreign involvement. Contract duration of nearly two years suggests a substantial project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Undisclosed foreign awardees
Lack of transparency in subcontracting

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition
Firm Fixed Price contract type

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Construction sector, specifically related to site preparation and infrastructure. Spending benchmarks for similar security infrastructure projects vary widely based on location, scale, and specific security requirements.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The focus appears to be on larger, potentially international entities.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight mechanisms should be robust to ensure accountability, especially given the concerns about foreign awardees.

Related Government Programs

Site Preparation Contractors
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Concerns regarding foreign awardees
Lack of transparency on subcontractors
Potential national security implications
Limited visibility into contractor vetting

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). SHINAND PERIMETER FENCE & GUARD TOWERS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOREIGN AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-25. End: 2012-10-13.

What specific security risks are associated with undisclosed foreign awardees for perimeter security infrastructure?

Undisclosed foreign awardees for perimeter security infrastructure pose significant risks, including potential vulnerabilities to espionage, sabotage, or the introduction of compromised materials. Lack of transparency hinders thorough vetting and could undermine the integrity of the security measures, potentially impacting national security.

How does the firm fixed price contract type mitigate financial risk for the government in this scenario?

The firm fixed price contract type locks in the total cost of the project, shifting the risk of cost overruns to the contractor. This provides budget certainty for the government, assuming the initial price was fair and competitive. However, it does not mitigate risks related to performance or security if the contractor is unable to deliver as specified.

What is the potential impact on taxpayer value given the concerns about foreign awardees?

The potential impact on taxpayer value is concerning. While the contract was competitively awarded, the undisclosed foreign awardees introduce risks that could lead to compromised security, project delays, or the need for costly remediation. These risks could ultimately outweigh any initial cost savings, diminishing the overall value for taxpayers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Specialty Trade Contractors › Site Preparation Contractors

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCT NONBUILDING FACILITIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: W5J9LE10R0068

Offers Received: 36

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405

Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,765,671

Exercised Options: $17,765,671

Current Obligation: $17,765,671

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline