Customs and Border Protection awards $15M for HH-60L aircraft modifications, impacting Alabama's aerospace sector
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,057,351 ($15.1M)
Contractor: Defense Systems and Solutions
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-01-09
End Date: 2027-10-31
Contract Duration: 1,391 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION HH-60L AIRCRAFT 12 MODIFICATIONS
Place of Performance
Location: HUNTSVILLE, MADISON County, ALABAMA, 35806
State: Alabama Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $15.1 million to DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS for work described as: CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION HH-60L AIRCRAFT 12 MODIFICATIONS Key points: 1. Contract value of $15.06 million for aircraft modifications suggests a significant investment in fleet readiness. 2. The contract type, Cost Plus Fixed Fee, can introduce cost escalation risks if not closely managed. 3. Competition was conducted under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating a specific justification for limiting bidders. 4. The award to Defense Systems and Solutions highlights a key contractor in the aerospace support sector. 5. The modifications are for HH-60L aircraft, a critical asset for Customs and Border Protection operations. 6. The contract duration of approximately 3.8 years allows for phased implementation and testing of modifications.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $15.06 million for 12 aircraft modifications appears reasonable given the specialized nature of military aircraft work. However, without specific details on the scope of modifications, direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure introduces inherent risk for cost overruns, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs plus a fixed fee. This necessitates robust oversight to ensure value for money and prevent unnecessary expenses.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This designation implies that while the competition was intended to be open, specific circumstances led to the exclusion of certain potential bidders. The exact reasons for this exclusion are not detailed but typically involve proprietary technology, unique capabilities, or prior development efforts. The limited nature of the competition may restrict the range of pricing and innovation compared to a truly open solicitation.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may face higher costs due to a potentially reduced competitive landscape. The justification for excluding sources needs to be rigorously evaluated to ensure it aligns with the government's objective of obtaining the best value.
Public Impact
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will benefit from enhanced capabilities and readiness of its HH-60L aircraft fleet. The services delivered include critical modifications to ensure the operational effectiveness and safety of the aircraft. The contract's performance is geographically centered in Alabama, supporting the state's aerospace industry and workforce. This contract will likely sustain or create jobs within the aerospace maintenance and modification sector in Alabama.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type carries inherent risk of cost escalation if not meticulously managed and overseen.
- The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation raises questions about the extent of true competition and potential impact on pricing.
- Lack of detailed scope of work for modifications makes it difficult to benchmark value-for-money effectively.
- The contractor, Defense Systems and Solutions, needs a proven track record with similar complex aircraft modifications for this specific platform.
Positive Signals
- Awarding modifications to a critical CBP asset like the HH-60L demonstrates a commitment to operational readiness.
- The contract duration allows for a structured and phased approach to implementing the necessary upgrades.
- The performance location in Alabama aligns with existing aerospace infrastructure and expertise.
Sector Analysis
The aerospace and defense sector is characterized by high technological complexity, stringent regulatory requirements, and significant government spending. This contract falls within the aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment manufacturing sub-sector. The market for aircraft modifications is competitive, but often specialized, with a few key players possessing the necessary certifications and expertise. Government spending in this area is crucial for maintaining aging fleets and incorporating new technologies, with benchmarks often driven by the specific aircraft type and complexity of the required upgrades.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small business participation is not a primary focus for this specific contract, as the 'sb' field is false. There is no explicit small business set-aside mentioned. Subcontracting opportunities for small businesses may exist, but they would depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the nature of the work packages. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless significant subcontracting occurs.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract will be critical, likely managed by the Department of the Army on behalf of CBP. Accountability measures will involve rigorous review of incurred costs, progress reports, and adherence to the fixed fee. Transparency will depend on the agency's reporting practices regarding contract performance and expenditures. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.
Related Government Programs
- CBP Aviation
- Department of Defense Aircraft Maintenance
- Helicopter Modification Programs
- Aerospace Manufacturing and Repair
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage potential cost overruns.
- Limited competition due to source exclusion may impact price competitiveness.
- Scope of modifications is not detailed, hindering precise value assessment.
- Contractor's specific experience with HH-60L modifications needs verification.
Tags
customs-and-border-protection, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, aircraft-modifications, cost-plus-fixed-fee, limited-competition, aerospace, alabama, defense-systems-and-solutions, hh-60l-helicopter, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $15.1 million to DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION HH-60L AIRCRAFT 12 MODIFICATIONS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DEFENSE SYSTEMS AND SOLUTIONS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-01-09. End: 2027-10-31.
What is the specific scope of the 12 modifications to the HH-60L aircraft, and how do these modifications enhance operational capabilities?
The provided data does not detail the specific scope of the 12 modifications to the HH-60L aircraft. These modifications are likely aimed at enhancing the aircraft's operational capabilities, which could include upgrades to avionics, communication systems, sensor suites, structural integrity, or mission-specific equipment. For Customs and Border Protection (CBP), such enhancements could translate to improved surveillance, interdiction, search and rescue, or transport capabilities. A thorough understanding of the modification details is essential for assessing their true value and impact on CBP's mission effectiveness. Without this information, it is difficult to determine if the $15.06 million award represents a fair price for the anticipated improvements.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) pricing structure for this contract compare to industry standards for similar aircraft modification projects?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure is common in complex defense and aerospace projects where the scope of work can be difficult to define precisely upfront, or where innovation and adaptation are expected during performance. For aircraft modifications, especially those involving older platforms like the HH-60L, unforeseen issues can arise, making CPFF a suitable, albeit riskier, choice. Industry standards often favor fixed-price contracts for well-defined scopes. However, when significant unknowns exist, CPFF allows the contractor to be reimbursed for actual costs plus a negotiated fixed fee, incentivizing completion. The key to value-for-money with CPFF lies in robust government oversight to control costs and ensure the fixed fee is reasonable for the effort involved. Benchmarking the fixed fee against similar projects is crucial for assessing fairness.
What were the specific justifications for excluding sources in this 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award, and what was the competitive landscape?
The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that the solicitation was initially intended to be open to all responsible sources, but specific criteria or circumstances led to the exclusion of certain potential bidders. Common justifications include proprietary data rights, unique capabilities developed by a specific contractor, or prior substantial investment in research and development by a particular firm that would make their offering significantly superior or more cost-effective. Without further details from the contract award notice or agency documentation, the precise reasons for exclusion remain unclear. This limited competition potentially reduces price pressure and may result in a higher overall cost to the government compared to a scenario with broader participation.
What is the track record of Defense Systems and Solutions in performing similar HH-60L aircraft modifications or complex aerospace support contracts?
Information regarding the specific track record of Defense Systems and Solutions (DSS) in performing HH-60L aircraft modifications is not detailed in the provided data. To assess the risk and value of this contract, a review of DSS's past performance is essential. This would include examining their experience with similar helicopter platforms, the complexity of modifications undertaken, their history of meeting schedule and budget requirements, and any past performance issues or commendations. Their success in previous contracts, particularly those involving Cost Plus Fixed Fee structures and similar technical challenges, would provide critical insights into their capability to successfully execute this $15.06 million award for CBP.
How does the $15.06 million contract value for 12 modifications compare to historical spending on HH-60L aircraft sustainment and upgrades by CBP or other agencies?
Comparing the $15.06 million contract value for 12 HH-60L modifications to historical spending requires access to broader contract databases and historical financial records. The average cost per modification would be approximately $1.25 million ($15.06M / 12). This figure needs to be contextualized by the specific nature of the modifications. If these are extensive avionics or structural upgrades, this cost might be within a reasonable range. However, without knowing the scope, it's difficult to establish a definitive benchmark. Historical data on similar modification efforts for the HH-60L or comparable military helicopters by agencies like the Department of Defense or other law enforcement aviation units would be necessary to determine if this award represents an increase, decrease, or alignment with past spending trends.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 631 DISCOVERY DR, HUNTSVILLE, AL, 35806
Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, SBA Certified 8 a Joint Venture, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,057,351
Exercised Options: $15,057,351
Current Obligation: $15,057,351
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W58RGZ18D0001
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-01-09
Current End Date: 2027-10-31
Potential End Date: 2027-10-31 12:10:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-25
More Contracts from Defense Systems and Solutions
- This Effort IS to Provide Production-Representative Hardware Kits and Corresponding Production Support for the UH-60V Program — $220.4M (Department of Defense)
- Requirement to Provide for the Personnel, Materials, Facilities, Services, and Support Required to Design, Modify, Verify, and Document System Performance and Airworthiness to Deliver UH-60M Aircraft for the Commonwealth of Australia — $149.5M (Department of Defense)
- MV-22 Inventory Management Support — $93.1M (Department of Defense)
- Provide an Assessment of the Component Service Shops for Fielded Rsaf SE Located Within the KSA AT Khamis (king Khalid AIR Base (AB) Kkab), Dhahran (king Abdulaziz AB Kaab), Taif (king Fahad AB Ksab) and Tabuk (king Faisal AB Kfab) — $91.5M (Department of Defense)
- V-22 Management — $85.6M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)