Army Awards Boeing $228M for Engineering Services Task Order, No Competition Identified

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $227,879,951 ($227.9M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-01-04

End Date: 2025-07-02

Contract Duration: 1,275 days

Daily Burn Rate: $178.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AWARD OF VERSION 6X CONFIGURATION TASK ORDER.

Place of Performance

Location: MESA, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85215

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $227.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: AWARD OF VERSION 6X CONFIGURATION TASK ORDER. Key points: 1. Significant award to a major defense contractor. 2. Sole-source nature raises questions about price discovery. 3. Long duration suggests a complex, ongoing need. 4. Engineering services sector is critical for defense modernization.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly. Benchmarking against similar engineering services contracts is difficult without more detailed scope information.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This award was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition procurement. This lack of competition may have resulted in a higher price than could have been achieved through a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition could lead to taxpayers paying more than necessary for these engineering services.

Public Impact

Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competition. Impact on defense readiness if services are not cost-effective. Opportunity for future oversight to ensure value for money.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This award falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is vital for the Department of Defense's research, development, and acquisition processes. Spending in this sector is often substantial and directly tied to national security objectives.

Small Business Impact

The awardee is The Boeing Company, a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors on this specific task order.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants close oversight to ensure the fixed fee is reasonable and that costs are appropriately managed throughout the contract's duration. Regular performance reviews are essential.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, az, delivery-order, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $227.9 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. AWARD OF VERSION 6X CONFIGURATION TASK ORDER.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $227.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-01-04. End: 2025-07-02.

What specific engineering services are being procured, and how do they align with current defense priorities?

The data indicates the award is for 'Engineering Services' related to 'Version 6X Configuration Task Order'. Without further details on the specific nature of these services and their configuration, it's difficult to definitively assess their alignment with current defense priorities. However, engineering services are generally crucial for system development, maintenance, and modernization within the Department of Defense.

What justification was provided for not competing this significant task order?

The provided data states the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A formal justification for this decision, such as a brand name justification or a finding of necessity, would typically be required for sole-source awards. Understanding this justification is key to assessing the legitimacy of the procurement approach and potential risks.

How will the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure be monitored to ensure cost control and prevent contractor profit inflation?

Effective oversight of a Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract requires rigorous monitoring of incurred costs and the contractor's performance against the fixed fee. The Army should implement stringent auditing procedures, regular progress reviews, and clear performance metrics to ensure the contractor operates efficiently and that the final cost remains reasonable and justified.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5000 E MCDOWELL RD, MESA, AZ, 85215

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $460,739,740

Exercised Options: $460,459,240

Current Obligation: $227,879,951

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 22

Total Subaward Amount: $9,525,101

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W58RGZ21D0077

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-01-04

Current End Date: 2025-07-02

Potential End Date: 2026-10-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-01-15

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending