DoD awards $1.6B Boeing contract for Apache helicopter support to Egypt, raising value-for-money questions
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $16,035,984 ($16.0M)
Contractor: THE Boeing Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2018-10-01
End Date: 2024-03-31
Contract Duration: 2,008 days
Daily Burn Rate: $8.0K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES (PPSS) OF 43 AH-64D APACHE ATTACK HELICOPTERS TO SUPPORT THE EGYPTIAN AIR FORCE (EAF) FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) CUSTOMER
Place of Performance
Location: MESA, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85215
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $16.0 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES (PPSS) OF 43 AH-64D APACHE ATTACK HELICOPTERS TO SUPPORT THE EGYPTIAN AIR FORCE (EAF) FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) CUSTOMER Key points: 1. Contract awarded via sole-source justification, limiting price competition and potentially increasing costs. 2. Long contract duration of 2008 days suggests a sustained need for support services. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type shifts risk to the contractor, but sole-source nature may negate competitive savings. 4. Services support Foreign Military Sales (FMS) customer, indicating international defense cooperation. 5. Contract value of $1.6 billion represents significant investment in maintaining advanced military assets. 6. Lack of competition raises concerns about achieving optimal value for taxpayer dollars. 7. Engineering services are critical for ensuring the operational readiness of complex military equipment.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $1.6 billion for post-production support of Apache helicopters is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it is difficult to benchmark the pricing against market rates or similar contracts. The firm fixed-price nature is positive for cost certainty, but the sole-source award means the government did not benefit from competitive pressure to drive down costs. This raises questions about whether the government secured the best possible value for this significant expenditure.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only one vendor, The Boeing Company, was solicited. This approach bypasses the standard competitive procurement process. While sole-source awards can be justified in specific circumstances (e.g., unique capabilities, urgent needs), they inherently limit price discovery and can lead to higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract. The absence of multiple bidders means there was no direct competition to incentivize lower pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competition. Without a competitive process, there is less assurance that the price reflects the lowest reasonable cost for these essential support services.
Public Impact
The Egyptian Air Force (EAF) benefits through the continued operational readiness of its AH-64D Apache attack helicopters. This contract ensures the availability of critical post-production support services, including engineering and maintenance. The geographic impact is primarily focused on supporting a foreign military partner, enhancing international security cooperation. Workforce implications include the need for specialized engineering and technical personnel within The Boeing Company to fulfill the contract.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in the procurement process due to non-competitive nature.
- Potential for cost overruns if pricing is not rigorously scrutinized without market comparison.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical support services.
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty once awarded.
- Contract ensures continued operational capability for a key military asset.
- Supports a foreign military sales customer, aligning with U.S. foreign policy objectives.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically focusing on aviation support services. The market for military aircraft sustainment is often dominated by original equipment manufacturers due to proprietary knowledge and specialized tooling. While large-scale contracts like this are common for major defense platforms, the lack of competition for this specific award is notable. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other sustainment contracts for similar helicopter platforms, but such data is often sensitive.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve small business set-asides, as it was awarded sole-source to a large prime contractor. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The focus is on direct support from the prime, potentially limiting opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific procurement. The overall impact on the small business ecosystem for defense contracting is likely minimal for this particular award.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Army and the Department of Defense's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, which places cost risk on the contractor. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- Foreign Military Sales (FMS) Program
- Apache Attack Helicopter Sustainment
- Aerospace Engineering Services
- Defense Logistics Agency Support
- Military Aircraft Maintenance Contracts
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competitive bidding
- High contract value
- Long contract duration
Tags
defense, foreign-military-sales, apache-helicopter, post-production-support, engineering-services, sole-source, the-boeing-company, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, firm-fixed-price, arizona, international-cooperation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $16.0 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES (PPSS) OF 43 AH-64D APACHE ATTACK HELICOPTERS TO SUPPORT THE EGYPTIAN AIR FORCE (EAF) FOREIGN MILITARY SALES (FMS) CUSTOMER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $16.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2018-10-01. End: 2024-03-31.
What is the historical spending pattern for post-production support services for the AH-64D Apache helicopter, particularly with the Egyptian Air Force?
Detailed historical spending data for this specific contract and customer is not publicly available in the provided snippet. However, the duration of the contract (2008 days) and its substantial value ($1.6 billion) suggest a significant and ongoing investment in supporting the AH-64D Apache fleet for the Egyptian Air Force. Typically, sustainment contracts for complex military platforms are multi-year endeavors, reflecting the long operational life of these assets. Analyzing past FMS support contracts for similar platforms or previous support agreements with Egypt could provide context, but such data requires access to specialized defense procurement databases.
How does the $1.6 billion contract value compare to similar post-production support contracts for attack helicopters?
Direct comparison of the $1.6 billion contract value for AH-64D Apache post-production support to similar contracts is challenging without access to proprietary or classified data on other sustainment agreements. However, the value is substantial, reflecting the complexity and cost associated with maintaining advanced attack helicopters. Contracts for major defense platforms often run into hundreds of millions or billions of dollars over their lifecycle. Factors influencing this value include the number of aircraft supported, the scope of services (e.g., engineering, spare parts, training, maintenance), and the duration of the contract. The sole-source nature of this award also means it may not reflect the most competitive pricing achievable.
What are the specific engineering services included in this 'Post Production Support Services' contract?
The provided data indicates the contract covers 'POST PRODUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES (PPSS)' for 43 AH-64D Apache attack helicopters. While specific engineering services are not itemized, they typically encompass a range of activities crucial for maintaining the operational readiness and safety of complex military aircraft. This can include technical support, troubleshooting, modifications, upgrades, reliability and maintainability engineering, logistics support analysis, and potentially repair and overhaul engineering. Given the 'Engineering Services' NAICS code (541330), a significant focus is expected on technical expertise and problem-solving related to the helicopter's systems.
What is The Boeing Company's track record in providing support services for the AH-64 Apache platform?
The Boeing Company is the original manufacturer of the AH-64 Apache attack helicopter, giving it extensive historical knowledge and expertise regarding the platform. Boeing has a long-standing track record of providing sustainment, modernization, and support services for the Apache fleet to numerous domestic and international customers, including the U.S. Army and various Foreign Military Sales clients. Their involvement spans decades, from initial production through various upgrades and ongoing operational support. This deep institutional knowledge and established relationship are often key factors in sole-source justifications for such critical support contracts.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for critical defense support services?
The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for critical defense support services is the potential for inflated costs due to the absence of competitive pressure. Without competing bids, the government may not achieve the best possible price. Other risks include reduced innovation, as the contractor may have less incentive to propose cost-saving efficiencies or novel solutions. Furthermore, sole-source awards can create long-term dependencies on a single provider, potentially limiting flexibility and increasing vulnerability if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties. Ensuring robust oversight and negotiation is crucial to mitigate these risks.
How does this contract align with the broader U.S. foreign military sales objectives?
This contract directly supports U.S. foreign military sales (FMS) objectives by providing essential sustainment for a key defense asset to a partner nation, Egypt. The FMS program aims to enhance the security capabilities of allies and partners, thereby promoting regional stability and U.S. security interests. By ensuring the operational readiness of Egypt's AH-64D Apache fleet, the U.S. helps maintain a balance of power in a strategically important region and strengthens military interoperability. This contract facilitates Egypt's ability to address its security needs while utilizing U.S.-origin equipment.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W58RGZ17R0232
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 5000 EAST MCDOWELL ROAD, MESA, AZ, 85215
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,896,683
Exercised Options: $16,035,984
Current Obligation: $16,035,984
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $516,639
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2018-10-01
Current End Date: 2024-03-31
Potential End Date: 2024-03-31 12:03:00
Last Modified: 2025-10-03
More Contracts from THE Boeing Company
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (Department of Defense)
- International Space Station — $22.4B (National Aeronautics and Space Administration)
- 200112!000108!9700!ZD60 !ballistic Missile Defense ORG. !HQ000601C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20001222!20080930!848025649!848025649!009256819!n!the Boeing Company !3370 E Miraloma AVE !anaheim !ca!92806!37000!089!01!huntsville !madison !alabama !+000383571022!n!n!000000000000!ad93!rdte/Other Defense-Adv Tech DEV !S1 !services !1caa!ballistic Missile Defense SYS !541710!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !A !U!R!2!001!B! !Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $18.8B (Department of Defense)
- USN P-8A FRP II Long Lead Material — $18.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200512!010860!2100!w56hzv!tacom - Warren !w56hzv05c0724 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050923!20141231!016544780!016544780!009256819!n!the Boeing Company !J S Mcdonnell Blvd !saint Louis !mo!63166!65000!510!29!st. Louis !ST. Louis (city) !missouri !+000219245691!n!n!000000000000!az15!rdte/Other Research&development-Eng/Manuf Devel !S1 !services !301 !FCS !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !d!u!u!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! TAS::21 2040::TAS — $12.7B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)