DoD Awards $51.1M for Republic of Korea FCR and Support to Longbow LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,121,800 ($51.1M)

Contractor: Longbow LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2013-09-09

End Date: 2018-04-30

Contract Duration: 1,694 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: QTY 6 EA FCR AND SUPPORT FOR REPUBLIC OF KOREA

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32819

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $51.1 million to LONGBOW LLC for work described as: QTY 6 EA FCR AND SUPPORT FOR REPUBLIC OF KOREA Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Longbow LLC for FCR and support services. 2. Significant contract value of $51.1 million. 3. Competition type was Full and Open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract spans nearly five years, indicating a long-term need. 5. Sector is Aircraft Manufacturing, a specialized and critical industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $51.1 million for 6 units of FCR and support is substantial. Benchmarking against similar complex aircraft systems is difficult without more specific technical details, but the price per unit appears high.

Cost Per Unit: $8.5M per unit (estimated)

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and value for the government. The use of a definitive contract suggests a well-defined scope of work.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best possible price for these specialized systems.

Public Impact

Enhances military capabilities for the Republic of Korea through advanced FCR technology. Supports critical defense infrastructure and international partnerships. Potential for follow-on contracts or sustainment services. Impacts the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

High per-unit cost requires scrutiny.
Long contract duration may lead to cost overruns if not managed.
Limited information on specific FCR capabilities and performance metrics.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition.
Supports a key international ally.
Firm Fixed Price contract type limits cost risk.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Aircraft Manufacturing sector, specifically for advanced radar systems. Spending in this area is typically high due to the complexity and technological sophistication required for defense applications.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates the prime contractor is Longbow LLC. There is no explicit information provided regarding small business participation in this contract, which warrants further investigation.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army awarded this contract, implying oversight from a major defense agency. The definitive contract structure and firm fixed price terms suggest a degree of accountability, but ongoing performance monitoring is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Aircraft Manufacturing
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

High unit cost.
Long contract duration.
Lack of detailed technical specifications.
Unclear small business participation.
Potential for obsolescence in advanced technology.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $51.1 million to LONGBOW LLC. QTY 6 EA FCR AND SUPPORT FOR REPUBLIC OF KOREA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LONGBOW LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2013-09-09. End: 2018-04-30.

What specific FCR technology is being provided, and how does it compare to current market offerings in terms of capability and cost-effectiveness?

The specific FCR technology is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough analysis would require examining the technical specifications and performance requirements outlined in the contract solicitation. Comparing this to market offerings would involve researching similar systems from other defense contractors to assess if the $51.1 million price tag for six units represents a competitive value, considering the technological advancements and operational benefits.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this FCR system, and how will their achievement be measured and verified throughout the contract period?

Key performance indicators are not specified in the provided data. Effective oversight would necessitate defining measurable metrics related to the FCR's detection range, accuracy, reliability, and operational readiness. The Department of the Army should have a robust system for tracking these KPIs, potentially including field testing, maintenance logs, and user feedback from the Republic of Korea to ensure the system meets its intended performance standards.

What is the long-term sustainment and upgrade strategy for these FCR systems, and what are the projected costs beyond the initial contract award?

The provided data covers the initial acquisition and support phase ending in April 2018. A comprehensive analysis requires understanding the planned sustainment, maintenance, and potential upgrade pathways for these FCR systems. Estimating future costs associated with spare parts, technical support, software updates, and potential technology refreshes is crucial for a complete picture of the total ownership cost and long-term value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Aircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp

Address: 5600 W SAND LAKE RD, ORLANDO, FL, 32819

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,121,800

Exercised Options: $51,121,800

Current Obligation: $51,121,800

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline