DoD Awards Boeing $322.7M for 10 New Build Aircraft, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $322,658,718 ($322.7M)

Contractor: THE Boeing Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-05-05

End Date: 2016-06-30

Contract Duration: 2,248 days

Daily Burn Rate: $143.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: EGYPT 10 NEW BUILD LONG LEAD FOR MATERIAL AND LABOR

Place of Performance

Location: MESA, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85215

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $322.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY for work described as: EGYPT 10 NEW BUILD LONG LEAD FOR MATERIAL AND LABOR Key points: 1. Significant investment in aircraft manufacturing with a substantial price tag. 2. Sole-source award to Boeing raises questions about competitive pricing and value. 3. Long lead times for materials and labor suggest potential for cost overruns. 4. Contract duration spans over 6 years, indicating a long-term commitment.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $322.7 million for 10 aircraft is difficult to assess without specific unit cost data. However, the lack of competition for a significant procurement like this raises concerns about whether the government achieved the best possible price.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to The Boeing Company. This method limits price discovery and may result in higher costs compared to a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for this substantial contract means taxpayers may not have received the most cost-effective solution, potentially leading to overpayment.

Public Impact

Procurement of new aircraft impacts national defense capabilities. Long-term contract may influence future defense spending priorities. Award to a single large contractor could affect market dynamics for aircraft manufacturing. Potential for job creation and economic activity in Arizona where the contractor is located.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the aerospace and defense sector, specifically aircraft manufacturing. Spending benchmarks in this sector can vary widely based on aircraft type, complexity, and quantity. The $32.3 million average per aircraft in this award is substantial.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to The Boeing Company, a large prime contractor. There is no indication in the data that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or partners in this specific award, suggesting limited direct impact on the small business sector for this procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army. Oversight would typically involve contract management, performance monitoring, and financial accountability to ensure delivery and adherence to terms. The lack of competition warrants closer scrutiny of the justification and pricing.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

aircraft-manufacturing, department-of-defense, az, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $322.7 million to THE BOEING COMPANY. EGYPT 10 NEW BUILD LONG LEAD FOR MATERIAL AND LABOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BOEING COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $322.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-05-05. End: 2016-06-30.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to The Boeing Company, and were alternative sources considered?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED.' A sole-source award typically requires a strong justification, such as unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of viable alternatives. Without this justification, it's difficult to assess if the government adequately explored competitive options or if this was the only feasible path.

How does the per-unit cost of these aircraft compare to similar procurements or market rates, given the lack of competitive bidding?

The average per-unit cost is approximately $32.3 million ($322.7M / 10 units). Without competitive bids or publicly available benchmarks for these specific aircraft, it's challenging to definitively assess value. However, sole-source contracts often carry a risk of higher pricing due to the absence of market pressure.

What measures are in place to mitigate risks associated with long lead times for materials and labor, and potential cost escalations over the contract's duration?

While the contract is firm fixed price, the long lead times (2248 days) present inherent risks. The government's mitigation would likely involve close monitoring of Boeing's supply chain management, adherence to production schedules, and potentially contractual clauses addressing delays or unforeseen cost increases, though the fixed price nature aims to cap government exposure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingAircraft Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT AND STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W58RGZ10R0156

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5000 E MCDOWELL RD, MESA, AZ, 85215

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $322,658,718

Exercised Options: $322,658,718

Current Obligation: $322,658,718

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-05-05

Current End Date: 2016-06-30

Potential End Date: 2016-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-04-21

More Contracts from THE Boeing Company

View all THE Boeing Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending