DoD awards $151M contract for miscellaneous communication equipment to Innovative Concepts Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,596,591 ($18.6M)

Contractor: Innovative Concepts, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-03-17

End Date: 2011-09-30

Contract Duration: 2,753 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200406!002706!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ04C0171 !A!N! !N! ! !20040317!20041231!151218443!151218443!151218443!N!INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS INC !8200 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000004000000!N!N!000000000000!5895!MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !A3 !SHIPS !000 !* !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !D!N!U!1!001!N!1A!A!Y!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !B! !A!A!00 !A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.6 million to INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS, INC. for work described as: 200406!002706!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ04C0171 !A!N! !N! ! !20040317!20041231!151218443!151218443!151218443!N!INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS INC !8200 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIR… Key points: 1. The contract value is substantial at $151,218,443. 2. Innovative Concepts Inc. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 3. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically communication equipment.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $151,218,443 is significant. Benchmarking against similar contracts for miscellaneous communication equipment is difficult without more specific details on the equipment and services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This method may not result in the best possible price discovery for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source award limits the potential for cost savings through competition, potentially impacting taxpayer value.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may not have received the best value due to the lack of competition. The contract supports the Department of Defense's communication capabilities. The duration of the contract (2004-2011) suggests a long-term need for these services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 67 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Lack of detailed scope

Positive Signals

  • Supports critical defense communication needs
  • Long-term contract indicates sustained requirement

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for miscellaneous communication equipment. Spending in this area is critical for national security, but competitive procurement is essential to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was considered or required.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically be managed by the contracting agency to ensure performance and cost control, especially given the cost-plus fee structure.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Cost-plus contract type
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited transparency on equipment specifics
  • Unknown effectiveness

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, va, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.6 million to INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS, INC.. 200406!002706!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ04C0171 !A!N! !N! ! !20040317!20041231!151218443!151218443!151218443!N!INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS INC !8200 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000004000000!N!N!000000000000!5895!MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !A3 !SHIPS !000 !* !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is INNOVATIVE CONCEPTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-03-17. End: 2011-09-30.

What was the justification for the sole-source award, and were any efforts made to explore competitive options?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. Without further documentation, the specific justification for this sole-source award is unknown. Typically, sole-source awards are justified by factors such as urgency, unique capabilities, or lack of market competition. It is unclear if alternative sources were considered or if a competitive process was deemed impractical.

What are the specific types of 'miscellaneous communication equipment' procured under this contract, and how does the cost compare to market rates?

The data only specifies 'MISCELLANEOUS COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT' without further detail. Understanding the exact nature of this equipment is crucial for a meaningful cost comparison. The 'COST PLUS FIXED FEE' structure also complicates direct price benchmarking, as profit is a fixed amount regardless of actual costs incurred.

What is the effectiveness of the communication equipment and services provided by Innovative Concepts Inc. in supporting DoD operations?

The effectiveness of the equipment and services is not detailed in the provided data. Performance metrics, user feedback, and operational impact assessments would be necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of this contract. The long duration suggests a continued need, but not necessarily optimal performance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Elbit Systems Ltd (UEI: 514421098)

Address: 8200 GREENSBORO DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-03-17

Current End Date: 2011-09-30

Potential End Date: 2011-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-07-14

More Contracts from Innovative Concepts, Inc.

View all Innovative Concepts, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending