DoD awards $837.7M for Longbow Limited Liability Company's aircraft equipment, with no competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,339,749 ($24.3M)

Contractor: Longbow LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-12-23

End Date: 2011-09-02

Contract Duration: 2,810 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.7K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200403!001555!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ04C0073 !A!N! !N! ! !20031223!20050331!837750223!837750223!837750223!N!LONGBOW LIMITED LIABILITY COMP!5600 SAND LAKE RD !ORLANDO !FL!32819!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORANGE !FLORIDA !+000011600000!N!N!000000000000!AC15!RDTE/AIRCRAFT-ENG/MANUF DEVELOP !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !* !336413!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !D!U!J!1!001!N!1A!Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32819

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.3 million to LONGBOW LLC for work described as: 200403!001555!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ04C0073 !A!N! !N! ! !20031223!20050331!837750223!837750223!837750223!N!LONGBOW LIMITED LIABILITY COMP!5600 SAND LAKE RD !ORLANDO !FL!32819!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORAN… Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $837.7 million awarded to Longbow LLC. 2. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery and potential overspending. 3. Contract is for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'. 4. The award falls within the Defense sector, specifically for aviation and missile command.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $837.7 million is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to similar contracts for aircraft equipment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis ('NOT COMPETED'), indicating a lack of competitive bidding. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for an $837.7 million contract suggests taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for this aircraft equipment.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long duration of the contract (from 2003 to 2011) means potential overpayments could accumulate over time. Dependence on a single supplier for critical aircraft equipment could pose a risk to supply chain stability.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • High contract value
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Specific product for aviation and missile command

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically for aircraft equipment manufacturing. The total spending in this sub-sector can be significant, and competitive bidding is crucial for cost efficiency.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The award went to Longbow LLC.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this large contract warrants close oversight to ensure fair pricing and prevent potential waste, fraud, or abuse. Accountability for the justification of the sole-source award is important.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competition.
  • High contract value ($837.7M).
  • Long contract duration (2003-2011).
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to lack of competitive pressure.
  • Dependency on a single supplier for critical equipment.

Tags

other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, fl, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.3 million to LONGBOW LLC. 200403!001555!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ04C0073 !A!N! !N! ! !20031223!20050331!837750223!837750223!837750223!N!LONGBOW LIMITED LIABILITY COMP!5600 SAND LAKE RD !ORLANDO !FL!32819!53000!095!12!ORLANDO !ORANGE !FLORIDA !+000011600000!N!N!000000000000!AC15!RDTE/AIRCRAFT-ENG/MANUF DEVELOP !A1C!OTHER AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT !000 !* !336413!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LONGBOW LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-12-23. End: 2011-09-02.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A detailed justification would typically be required by the agency, outlining reasons such as unique capabilities of the contractor, urgent need, or lack of other responsible sources. Without this documentation, it's impossible to fully assess the necessity of the sole-source award.

How does the unit cost of this aircraft equipment compare to market benchmarks, given the sole-source nature?

Direct comparison to market benchmarks is challenging due to the sole-source award. Typically, competitive contracts allow for price comparisons. The lack of competition here means the government relied on Longbow LLC's pricing without external validation, potentially leading to a higher per-unit cost than if multiple bids were considered.

What is the potential risk to the Department of Defense if Longbow LLC is the sole provider of this specific aircraft equipment?

The primary risk is supply chain vulnerability and potential price gouging. If Longbow LLC is the only source, the DoD is dependent on their production capabilities and pricing. Any disruption in their operations or significant price increases could negatively impact military readiness and budget.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)

Address: 5600 SAND LAKE RD, ORLANDO, FL, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2003-12-23

Current End Date: 2011-09-02

Potential End Date: 2011-09-02 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2010-09-02

More Contracts from Longbow LLC

View all Longbow LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending