DoD Awards $42.3M Firm Fixed Price Order to Honeywell for TIGER III Hardware

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $42,249,633 ($42.2M)

Contractor: Honeywell International Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-03-05

End Date: 2025-09-30

Contract Duration: 574 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: TIGER III YEAR FOUR HARDWARE DELIVERY ORDER ELEVENTH INCREMENT.

Place of Performance

Location: PHOENIX, MARICOPA County, ARIZONA, 85034

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $42.2 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC. for work described as: TIGER III YEAR FOUR HARDWARE DELIVERY ORDER ELEVENTH INCREMENT. Key points: 1. Significant award for armored vehicle components, indicating ongoing modernization efforts. 2. Sole-source award to Honeywell raises questions about competition and potential price discovery. 3. Long-term delivery order suggests sustained demand for TIGER III program. 4. Focus on hardware delivery highlights a critical phase in military vehicle development.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $42.3M award is a substantial sum for a single delivery order. Without comparable contracts for similar TIGER III hardware increments or alternative systems, assessing its value is challenging. The firm fixed price contract type aims to control costs, but the lack of competition limits price discovery.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to Honeywell International Inc. This approach bypasses competitive bidding, potentially leading to higher prices than if multiple vendors had vied for the contract. The rationale for sole-sourcing is not provided but could be due to specialized technology or existing integration.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition in this sole-source award means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for this hardware. The full value of taxpayer funds is contingent on Honeywell's pricing efficiency without competitive pressure.

Public Impact

Enhances military armored vehicle capabilities through TIGER III program. Supports advanced technology integration in defense systems. Contributes to national defense readiness and modernization. Potential impact on supply chain for specialized military components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits price competition.
  • Lack of transparency on justification for sole-sourcing.
  • Potential for cost overruns without competitive pressure.

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed price contract aims to control costs.
  • Award supports critical defense modernization program.
  • Long-term delivery order indicates program stability.

Sector Analysis

This award falls within the Defense sector, specifically military vehicle manufacturing. Spending in this area is driven by national security needs and technological advancements. Benchmarks for similar large-scale hardware delivery orders for armored vehicles can vary significantly based on system complexity and quantity.

Small Business Impact

The awardee is Honeywell International Inc., a large corporation. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific delivery order, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation is mandated or encouraged in other parts of the TIGER III program.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Army awarded this delivery order under the TIGER III program. Oversight would typically involve contract management, performance monitoring, and financial accountability to ensure the hardware is delivered as specified and within budget. The sole-source nature warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and necessity.

Related Government Programs

  • Military Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
  • Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competition.
  • Limited transparency on the necessity of sole-sourcing.
  • Dependence on a single supplier for critical hardware.

Tags

military-armored-vehicle-tank-and-tank-c, department-of-defense, az, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $42.2 million to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC.. TIGER III YEAR FOUR HARDWARE DELIVERY ORDER ELEVENTH INCREMENT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $42.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-03-05. End: 2025-09-30.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract as sole-source to Honeywell International Inc. for the TIGER III hardware?

The justification for a sole-source award typically stems from unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or essential integration requirements that only one vendor can meet. Without specific documentation from the Department of the Army, it's presumed that Honeywell possesses unique expertise or intellectual property related to the TIGER III system that makes competitive procurement impractical or detrimental to program objectives.

How does the unit cost of this TIGER III hardware compare to similar armored vehicle components or previous TIGER III increments, given the sole-source nature?

Direct comparison is difficult due to the sole-source award and lack of publicly available cost breakdowns for this specific increment. While the firm fixed price contract aims to cap costs, the absence of competition means there's no market-driven benchmark to assess if the price is optimal. Historical data from previous TIGER III increments, if available and comparable, would be the closest proxy, but variations in hardware specifications could still skew comparisons.

What is the long-term strategic value and effectiveness of the TIGER III hardware being procured under this order for the Department of Defense?

The TIGER III hardware is intended to enhance the capabilities of the U.S. Army's armored vehicle fleet, likely focusing on improved protection, mobility, lethality, or network integration. Its strategic value lies in modernizing key combat platforms to maintain a technological edge and ensure operational effectiveness in current and future threat environments. The effectiveness will be measured by its performance in training and potential deployment scenarios.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Transportation Equipment ManufacturingMilitary Armored Vehicle, Tank, and Tank Component Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: ENGINES AND TURBINES AND COMPONENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Resideo Technologies, Inc.

Address: 111 S 34TH ST, PHOENIX, AZ, 85034

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,249,633

Exercised Options: $42,249,633

Current Obligation: $42,249,633

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 202

Total Subaward Amount: $23,013,147

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W56HZV20D0062

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-03-05

Current End Date: 2025-09-30

Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2024-04-25

More Contracts from Honeywell International Inc.

View all Honeywell International Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending