General Dynamics awarded $19.5M for automotive repair services, highlighting ongoing defense maintenance needs
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $19,542,050 ($19.5M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-03-01
End Date: 2024-02-29
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $53.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: 2023 NET & FIELDING TASK ORDER
Place of Performance
Location: STERLING HEIGHTS, MACOMB County, MICHIGAN, 48310
State: Michigan Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $19.5 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC. for work described as: 2023 NET & FIELDING TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in maintaining operational readiness for military vehicles. 2. The award falls within the broader category of defense logistics and maintenance, a critical but often overlooked sector. 3. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive market for specialized automotive repair services. 4. Performance context is crucial, as timely and effective repairs directly impact equipment availability. 5. Sector positioning indicates a reliance on established defense contractors for essential support services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $19.5 million for a one-year period appears reasonable for specialized automotive repair services supporting military equipment. Benchmarking against similar contracts for fleet maintenance within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the cost-plus-fixed-fee structure necessitates careful oversight to manage potential cost overruns and ensure efficient resource utilization. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes a definitive value assessment challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wider range of technical solutions. The open competition suggests that the Department of the Army sought the best value from the market, rather than being limited to a pre-selected group of contractors.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from full and open competition through potentially lower prices and access to innovative solutions that might not be available through other contracting methods. This approach helps ensure that government funds are used efficiently by driving down costs and improving service quality.
Public Impact
Military personnel and units relying on operational vehicles benefit from the maintenance and repair services provided. The services delivered ensure the readiness and availability of essential automotive equipment for defense operations. The contract's geographic impact is primarily centered around the operational areas of the Department of the Army, with potential implications for logistics hubs. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled automotive technicians and support staff to be employed by the prime contractor or its subcontractors.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contracts can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs to achieve a higher fee, requiring robust oversight.
- Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the true effectiveness and efficiency of the services rendered.
- The duration of the contract (one year) may limit long-term strategic planning for fleet maintenance and contractor relationship development.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that can lead to better pricing.
- The contract addresses a critical need for automotive repair, directly supporting military operational readiness.
- General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. is a large, established defense contractor with significant experience in this domain.
Sector Analysis
The automotive repair and maintenance sector is a vital component of the broader defense industrial base, ensuring the functionality of a wide array of military vehicles. This contract fits within the general category of defense logistics and support services. Comparable spending benchmarks in this area are difficult to establish without more specific details on the types of vehicles and complexity of repairs, but the overall defense spending on maintenance and repair is substantial, often running into billions of dollars annually.
Small Business Impact
The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While the prime contractor is a large entity, there may be opportunities for small businesses to participate as subcontractors, particularly in specialized repair areas or parts supply. The extent of small business subcontracting would depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific requirements of the contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, though detailed operational oversight remains within the agency. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Vehicle Maintenance
- Army Fleet Support Services
- General Automotive Repair Contracts
- Defense Logistics Agency Maintenance Contracts
- Military Vehicle Fielding and Sustainment
Risk Flags
- Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type requires diligent oversight to manage costs.
- Potential for parts availability delays impacting repair timelines.
- Need for specialized technician skills for military-grade vehicles.
- Ensuring adherence to stringent military maintenance standards.
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, automotive-repair, general-dynamics-land-systems-inc, cost-plus-fixed-fee, full-and-open-competition, delivery-order, maintenance-services, operational-readiness, michigan
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $19.5 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.. 2023 NET & FIELDING TASK ORDER
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $19.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-03-01. End: 2024-02-29.
What is the historical spending pattern for General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. with the Department of the Army for similar automotive repair services?
Analyzing historical spending for General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. with the Department of the Army for similar automotive repair services requires access to comprehensive contract databases. While this specific award is for approximately $19.5 million, a deeper dive would involve querying databases like FPDS-NG or USAspending.gov for prior contracts awarded to GDLS for vehicle maintenance, repair, and field support. This would reveal trends in contract values, types (e.g., cost-plus, fixed-price), duration, and the specific services rendered. Understanding past performance and spending levels can help contextualize the current award, identify potential increases or decreases in demand, and assess the contractor's long-term relationship with the agency for these types of services. Without specific historical data, it's difficult to determine if this $19.5 million award represents a significant increase or a continuation of established spending patterns.
How does the cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure for this contract compare to industry standards for similar defense maintenance services?
The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure is common in defense contracts, particularly for services where the scope of work can be uncertain or evolve, such as maintenance and repair. In a CPFF contract, the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. Industry standards often favor fixed-price contracts when requirements are well-defined to incentivize cost control. However, for complex or evolving maintenance needs, CPFF can be advantageous for the government by allowing flexibility while ensuring the contractor is compensated for their efforts. The 'fixed fee' component aims to provide the contractor with a predictable profit margin, theoretically reducing the incentive to inflate costs excessively. Benchmarking this specific fee against similar contracts would require detailed analysis of the fee percentage relative to the total contract value and comparison with other CPFF contracts for comparable services within the Department of Defense or other federal agencies. A higher-than-average fee could indicate higher perceived risk or specialized expertise required.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate the performance of General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. under this contract, and what are their historical performance ratings?
The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. under this contract, nor does it include historical performance ratings. Typically, for automotive repair and maintenance contracts, KPIs might include metrics such as vehicle turnaround time, quality of repairs (e.g., defect rate), adherence to maintenance schedules, parts availability, and customer satisfaction. Performance ratings are often captured in the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). Without access to CPARS data or specific contract clauses detailing performance expectations, it is impossible to assess GDLS's historical performance on similar contracts or to evaluate their likely performance on this award. Agencies use these ratings to inform future source selections and to hold contractors accountable for meeting contractual obligations.
What is the potential impact of this contract on the overall readiness and operational availability of the specific military units or fleets it supports?
This contract for $19.5 million directly supports the operational readiness and availability of military vehicles managed by the Department of the Army. Effective and timely automotive repair and maintenance are critical to ensuring that vehicles are functional and ready for deployment, training, and other operational missions. Delays in repairs, poor quality workmanship, or parts shortages could significantly degrade readiness, impacting unit effectiveness and potentially mission success. Conversely, efficient and high-quality service delivery under this contract will bolster the availability of essential equipment, enabling units to perform their duties without undue logistical constraints. The specific impact depends on the number and type of vehicles covered, the criticality of those vehicles to the supported units, and the efficiency with which General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. executes the contract.
Are there any specific risks associated with the 'General Automotive Repair' (NAICS 811111) industry that are particularly relevant to this Department of Defense contract?
Yes, several risks inherent in the 'General Automotive Repair' industry are particularly relevant to this Department of Defense contract. One significant risk is the availability and cost of specialized parts for military vehicles, which may differ from civilian counterparts and could lead to delays or increased costs if not managed effectively. Another risk is the need for highly skilled technicians capable of working on complex military-grade equipment, which may require specialized training and certifications. Furthermore, ensuring compliance with stringent military standards for maintenance and repair, beyond typical civilian automotive standards, presents a risk if not meticulously followed. The potential for unforeseen mechanical issues in aging or heavily used military fleets can also lead to scope creep and cost overruns, especially under a cost-plus contract. Finally, cybersecurity risks associated with connected vehicle systems, if applicable, could also be a concern.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration) › Automotive Repair and Maintenance › General Automotive Repair
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 38500 MOUND RD, STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, 48310
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $19,542,050
Exercised Options: $19,542,050
Current Obligation: $19,542,050
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W56HZV20D0075
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-03-01
Current End Date: 2024-02-29
Potential End Date: 2024-02-29 12:02:00
Last Modified: 2025-08-19
More Contracts from General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.
- Mobile Protected Firepower Engineering Manufacturing and Development / Middle Tier Acquisition — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- M1 Abrams Family of Vehicles — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Economic Order Quantity Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- System Tewchnical Support (sts)/System Sustainment Technical Support for the Abrams Tank Program — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200105!000201!1700!F9999 !marine Corps Systems Command !M6785401C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20010214!20060930!107153702!131266926!001381284!n!general Dynamics Amphibious SY!991 Annapolis WAY !woodbridge !va!22191!87312!153!51!woodbridge !prince William !virginia !+000023676102!n!n!000000000000!ac43!rdte/Tank - Automotive-Adv Tech DEV !a4a!combat Vehicles !2dbk!lvtp-7 !336992!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !n!r!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
View all General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)