DoD awards $43.6M for 135 SMET systems, with General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. as the prime contractor
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $43,578,127 ($43.6M)
Contractor: General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-12-21
End Date: 2026-09-14
Contract Duration: 1,363 days
Daily Burn Rate: $32.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FIVE-YEAR INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) PRODUCTION CONTRACT FOR SMALL MULTIPURPOSE EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT (SMET) SYSTEMS). ORDER FOR 135 FULL RATE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND ANCILLARY KITS.
Place of Performance
Location: STERLING HEIGHTS, MACOMB County, MICHIGAN, 48310
State: Michigan Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $43.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC. for work described as: FIVE-YEAR INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) PRODUCTION CONTRACT FOR SMALL MULTIPURPOSE EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT (SMET) SYSTEMS). ORDER FOR 135 FULL RATE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND ANCILLARY KITS. Key points: 1. This contract represents a significant investment in tactical vehicle modernization for the U.S. Army. 2. The award is for full-rate production, indicating successful prior testing and validation phases. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type suggests a defined cost structure, potentially limiting cost overruns. 4. Competition was full and open, which is generally favorable for achieving competitive pricing. 5. The contract duration spans over three years, implying a sustained need for these systems. 6. The specific equipment category, Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) systems, points to a niche but critical capability.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total award of $43.6 million for 135 systems equates to approximately $325,000 per unit. Benchmarking this against similar specialized military vehicle procurements requires detailed analysis of system capabilities, technological sophistication, and production volumes. However, given the firm-fixed-price nature and full and open competition, the pricing is likely competitive within its specific market segment. Further comparison with previous Army vehicle contracts or similar international procurements would provide a more precise value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: Approximately $325,000 per unit (135 systems / $43.6M)
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and technical solutions. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition was intended and likely achieved, which is a positive indicator for price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces, ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment in these critical transport systems.
Public Impact
The U.S. Army's ground forces will benefit from enhanced mobility and transport capabilities for equipment. The delivery of 135 SMET systems will support operational readiness and logistical efficiency. The primary geographic impact will be on military bases and operational theaters where these systems are deployed. The contract supports jobs within the defense manufacturing sector, specifically in transportation equipment manufacturing.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if ancillary kit requirements expand beyond initial estimates.
- Dependence on a single prime contractor for production could pose supply chain risks if not managed effectively.
- Long-term sustainment and maintenance costs for these systems are not detailed in this award.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
- Award to a known defense contractor like General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. indicates a level of established capability and experience.
Sector Analysis
The defense transportation equipment manufacturing sector is characterized by high technological barriers to entry and significant government procurement. This contract for Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) systems falls within the broader category of tactical wheeled vehicles. The market is dominated by a few large defense contractors capable of meeting stringent military specifications and production demands. Spending in this area is driven by the need for modernization of aging fleets and the development of new capabilities to meet evolving battlefield requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve other tactical vehicle procurements, such as armored personnel carriers or logistics support vehicles.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific small business subcontracting goals within the provided data. The prime contractor, General Dynamics Land Systems Inc., is a large defense manufacturer. While large prime contractors often utilize small business subcontractors, the absence of explicit set-aside or subcontracting requirements in this data means the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not quantifiable from this award alone. Further review of subcontracting plans would be necessary to assess the full impact.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivering the specified systems within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- Tactical Wheeled Vehicles
- Lightweight Tactical Vehicles
- Army Ground Vehicle Modernization Programs
- Logistics Support Vehicles
- Special Purpose Vehicles
Risk Flags
- Potential for supply chain vulnerabilities
- Long-term sustainment costs not fully detailed
- Dependence on prime contractor's production capacity
Tags
defense, department-of-the-army, general-dynamics-land-systems-inc, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, transportation-equipment-manufacturing, small-multipurpose-equipment-transport, production-contract, indefinite-delivery-indefinite-quantity, michigan, tactical-vehicles
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $43.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC.. FIVE-YEAR INDEFINITE DELIVERY/INDEFINITE QUANTITY (IDIQ) PRODUCTION CONTRACT FOR SMALL MULTIPURPOSE EQUIPMENT TRANSPORT (SMET) SYSTEMS). ORDER FOR 135 FULL RATE PRODUCTION SYSTEMS AND ANCILLARY KITS.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS LAND SYSTEMS INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $43.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-12-21. End: 2026-09-14.
What is the track record of General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. in delivering similar transportation equipment to the U.S. military?
General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. (GDLS) has a long and extensive track record of delivering a wide range of ground combat and tactical vehicles to the U.S. military and allied nations. They are well-known for producing the Abrams main battle tank and the Stryker family of vehicles. Their experience spans design, development, production, and sustainment of complex armored and unarmored platforms. GDLS has consistently been a major prime contractor for the U.S. Army, demonstrating a capacity to handle large-scale production contracts and meet demanding military specifications. Their history suggests a strong capability to execute on contracts like the SMET systems, although specific performance on similar multipurpose transport systems would require a deeper dive into their portfolio.
How does the per-unit cost of these SMET systems compare to other light tactical vehicles procured by the DoD?
The per-unit cost of approximately $325,000 for the SMET systems is on the higher end for light tactical vehicles, but it is crucial to consider the specific capabilities and intended role of the SMET. If the SMET systems are designed for specialized roles, potentially incorporating advanced mobility, payload capacity, or modularity beyond standard light utility vehicles (like the JLTV, which has a per-unit cost often ranging from $200,000 to $400,000 depending on configuration and volume), then this price point could be justified. Standard military trucks or simpler transport vehicles would be significantly less expensive. Without detailed specifications of the SMET's features, a direct comparison is challenging, but the price suggests a sophisticated, purpose-built platform rather than a general-purpose light truck.
What are the primary risks associated with the production and delivery of these SMET systems?
The primary risks associated with this contract include production delays due to supply chain disruptions for specialized components, potential cost increases if the firm-fixed-price contract does not adequately account for inflation or unforeseen manufacturing challenges, and performance risks if the delivered systems do not meet the demanding operational requirements of the U.S. Army. There's also a risk related to the long-term sustainment and maintenance of these systems, as the initial contract focuses on production. Furthermore, reliance on a single prime contractor for a critical capability can pose a risk if that contractor faces financial or operational difficulties. Ensuring robust quality control throughout the production process is also paramount.
What is the expected impact of these SMET systems on the Army's operational effectiveness?
The introduction of 135 Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) systems is expected to significantly enhance the U.S. Army's operational effectiveness by improving tactical mobility and logistical support. These systems are designed to transport essential equipment, supplies, and potentially personnel across various terrains, filling a critical gap between lighter utility vehicles and heavier cargo trucks. Their multipurpose nature suggests adaptability to different mission needs, potentially reducing the number of specialized vehicles required. Enhanced transport capability directly supports mission readiness, allowing units to deploy with necessary gear more efficiently and sustain operations effectively in diverse environments. This modernization contributes to overall force projection and operational agility.
How has spending on similar transportation equipment manufacturing contracts evolved over the past five years?
Spending on similar transportation equipment manufacturing contracts within the Department of Defense has generally remained robust, driven by ongoing military modernization efforts and the need to replace aging vehicle fleets. While specific figures for 'Small Multipurpose Equipment Transport (SMET) Systems' are not readily available as a distinct category in historical spending data, broader categories like 'Tactical Wheeled Vehicles' and 'Ground Combat Vehicles' have seen consistent investment. Factors influencing this spending include geopolitical tensions, evolving threat landscapes, and technological advancements in vehicle design and protection. The Army, in particular, has prioritized programs aimed at enhancing mobility, survivability, and network integration for its ground vehicle fleet, suggesting a sustained demand for such procurements.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing › All Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: HARDWARE AND ABRASIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 38500 MOUND RD, STERLING HEIGHTS, MI, 48310
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $43,578,127
Exercised Options: $43,578,127
Current Obligation: $43,578,127
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 2
Total Subaward Amount: $407,861
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W56HZV20D0061
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-12-21
Current End Date: 2026-09-14
Potential End Date: 2026-09-14 12:09:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-26
More Contracts from General Dynamics Land Systems Inc.
- Mobile Protected Firepower Engineering Manufacturing and Development / Middle Tier Acquisition — $1.4B (Department of Defense)
- M1 Abrams Family of Vehicles — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- Economic Order Quantity Contract — $1.2B (Department of Defense)
- System Tewchnical Support (sts)/System Sustainment Technical Support for the Abrams Tank Program — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- 200105!000201!1700!F9999 !marine Corps Systems Command !M6785401C0001 !A!N!*!N! !20010214!20060930!107153702!131266926!001381284!n!general Dynamics Amphibious SY!991 Annapolis WAY !woodbridge !va!22191!87312!153!51!woodbridge !prince William !virginia !+000023676102!n!n!000000000000!ac43!rdte/Tank - Automotive-Adv Tech DEV !a4a!combat Vehicles !2dbk!lvtp-7 !336992!*!*!3! ! ! !*!*!*!B!*!*!A! !D !n!r!1!001!n!1a!z!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
View all General Dynamics Land Systems Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)