Army awards $77.1M for Tank Rack Modules, with no competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $77,167,051 ($77.2M)
Contractor: DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-02-17
End Date: 2018-11-16
Contract Duration: 2,464 days
Daily Burn Rate: $31.3K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PROCURE A QUANTITY OF 800 EACH TANK RACK MODULES (TRMS). 380 EACH FOR INITIAL PRODUCTION AND 420 EACH FOR OUT YEAR PRODUCTION. PROCUREMENT INCLUDES PRICED OPTIONS FOR ANCILLARY HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR FIELDING AND PRESERVATION AND PACKAGING REQUIRED FOR LONG TERM STORAGE.
Place of Performance
Location: BRIDGETON, SAINT LOUIS County, MISSOURI, 63044
State: Missouri Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $77.2 million to DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC for work described as: PROCURE A QUANTITY OF 800 EACH TANK RACK MODULES (TRMS). 380 EACH FOR INITIAL PRODUCTION AND 420 EACH FOR OUT YEAR PRODUCTION. PROCUREMENT INCLUDES PRICED OPTIONS FOR ANCILLARY HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR FIELDING AND PRESERVATION AND PACKAGING REQUIRED FOR LONG TERM STORAGE. Key points: 1. Significant investment in specialized military equipment. 2. Sole-source award raises concerns about price discovery. 3. Long-term storage and fielding requirements noted. 4. No small business participation indicated.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $77.1M for 800 units suggests a per-unit cost of approximately $96,458. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to potential market rates for similar heavy-gauge metal tank components.
Cost Per Unit: $96,458
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award to DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. This lack of competition limits the government's ability to leverage market forces for the best possible price and terms.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are committed without the benefit of competitive pricing, potentially leading to overpayment for the Tank Rack Modules.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness by providing essential equipment for tanks. Supports long-term military readiness through preservation and packaging for storage. Procurement spans multiple years, indicating sustained demand. Potential for follow-on contracts for ancillary hardware and services.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Sole-source award
- No small business participation
Positive Signals
- Definitive contract provides clear terms
- Firm fixed price limits cost overrun risk
- Includes options for ancillary hardware
Sector Analysis
The procurement falls under the Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing sector. Spending benchmarks for specialized military hardware can vary widely, but a lack of competition for such a significant award warrants scrutiny.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. This represents a missed opportunity to support small business participation in defense contracting.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded as a definitive contract with a firm fixed price, suggesting clear terms and conditions. However, the sole-source nature of the award raises questions about the effectiveness of oversight in ensuring fair pricing.
Related Government Programs
- Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Sole-source award
- Potential for inflated pricing
- No small business participation
- Long-term storage costs not fully detailed
Tags
metal-tank-heavy-gauge-manufacturing, department-of-defense, mo, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $77.2 million to DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC. PROCURE A QUANTITY OF 800 EACH TANK RACK MODULES (TRMS). 380 EACH FOR INITIAL PRODUCTION AND 420 EACH FOR OUT YEAR PRODUCTION. PROCUREMENT INCLUDES PRICED OPTIONS FOR ANCILLARY HARDWARE REQUIRED FOR FIELDING AND PRESERVATION AND PACKAGING REQUIRED FOR LONG TERM STORAGE.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DRS SUSTAINMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $77.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-02-17. End: 2018-11-16.
What is the justification for the sole-source award of the Tank Rack Modules, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves factors like unique capabilities, urgent need, or lack of viable alternatives. Without specific documentation, it's presumed the Army determined DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc. was the only source capable of meeting the requirements. However, the absence of competition makes it imperative to verify that rigorous price analysis was conducted to ensure the $77.1M award was fair and reasonable.
What are the long-term implications of procuring specialized tank components through a non-competitive process on future defense budgets?
Procuring specialized components like Tank Rack Modules via sole-source contracts can set a precedent and potentially inflate future costs if not carefully managed. Without competitive pressure, the incumbent contractor may have less incentive to reduce prices. This can lead to higher overall defense spending over time, as similar sole-source awards for related or future systems could follow, impacting budget allocation for other critical defense needs.
How will the ancillary hardware and preservation/packaging options be evaluated and priced to ensure value for taxpayer dollars?
The contract includes priced options for ancillary hardware and preservation/packaging. The government should conduct thorough market research and price analysis for these options, even if they are with the same contractor. Evaluating these against industry standards and potentially seeking competitive quotes for similar services, where feasible, will be crucial to ensure these additional costs are justified and do not represent further overspending.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Boiler, Tank, and Shipping Container Manufacturing › Metal Tank (Heavy Gauge) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT/REPAIR SHOP EQPT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Leonardo SPA
Address: 201 EVANS LN, SAINT LOUIS, MO, 63121
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $78,113,262
Exercised Options: $77,167,051
Current Obligation: $77,167,051
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-02-17
Current End Date: 2018-11-16
Potential End Date: 2018-11-16 12:11:00
Last Modified: 2022-08-26
More Contracts from DRS Sustainment Systems, Inc
- THE Purpose of This NEW Undefinitized Contract IS to Procure 146 Each Abrams Active Protection Systems, 826 Each Abrams Countermeasures, and 27 Kits of the Abrams Calibration/Maintenance Kits for the Department of the Army and the United States Marine Corps — $431.6M (Department of Defense)
- LOW Rate Initial Production/Full Rate Production for the Joint Assault Bridge — $397.7M (Department of Defense)
- Procurement of 274 Each M1000 Trailers — $104.8M (Department of Defense)
- This Task Order IS for Capability Development Document Increment-1, Procurement of 10 Configuration B Vehicles and Associated Spares — $103.3M (Department of Defense)
- M1200 Service Technical Support — $100.7M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)