DoD's $41.6M Allison Transmission Contract for Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing Showed Limited Small Business Participation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $41,633,501 ($41.6M)

Contractor: Allison Transmission, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2004-04-29

End Date: 2009-12-31

Contract Duration: 2,072 days

Daily Burn Rate: $20.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: TAS::97 4930::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: INDIANAPOLIS, MARION County, INDIANA, 46222

State: Indiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $41.6 million to ALLISON TRANSMISSION, INC. for work described as: TAS::97 4930::TAS Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Allison Transmission, Inc. for mechanical power transmission equipment manufacturing totaled $41.6 million. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a deliberate selection process. 3. The contract duration was 2072 days, indicating a long-term need for these components. 4. Small business participation was not a factor in this contract. 5. The contract was firm fixed price, providing cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $41.6 million for mechanical power transmission equipment is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts would be necessary to determine if this price was competitive, especially given the firm fixed price structure.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract utilized full and open competition after the exclusion of sources. This method aims to ensure the best value is obtained, but the exclusion of specific sources warrants further investigation into the rationale behind it.

Taxpayer Impact: The firm fixed price contract likely provided predictable costs for taxpayers, but the overall value for money depends on the competitive landscape and the necessity of the excluded sources.

Public Impact

Military readiness may be impacted by the availability and performance of these mechanical power transmission components. The long contract duration suggests a sustained demand for this specific type of equipment within the Department of the Army. The exclusion of sources in the competition process could limit innovation and potentially increase long-term costs if alternative suppliers are not considered.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of small business participation
  • Exclusion of sources in competition

Positive Signals

  • Firm fixed price contract
  • Full and open competition

Sector Analysis

The sector is Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing, a critical component for various military vehicles and machinery. Spending in this sector is often driven by defense modernization and sustainment needs.

Small Business Impact

This contract did not involve small businesses, as indicated by the 'sb' field being false. This suggests that the specific requirements of the mechanical power transmission equipment were likely met by larger, specialized manufacturers.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. Oversight would typically involve program management reviews, quality assurance checks, and financial audits to ensure compliance and performance.

Related Government Programs

  • Mechanical Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of small business participation
  • Exclusion of sources in competition
  • Potential for single-source dependency
  • Limited transparency on source exclusion rationale

Tags

mechanical-power-transmission-equipment-, department-of-defense, in, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $41.6 million to ALLISON TRANSMISSION, INC.. TAS::97 4930::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALLISON TRANSMISSION, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $41.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2004-04-29. End: 2009-12-31.

What was the specific rationale for excluding certain sources during the full and open competition process for this mechanical power transmission equipment contract?

The rationale for excluding sources in a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' contract is typically based on specific technical requirements, existing system compatibility, or unique manufacturing capabilities that only a limited number of vendors can meet. This exclusion is intended to ensure the procured equipment is essential for operational needs or interoperability, though it requires justification to prevent undue market restriction.

How did the firm fixed price structure impact the government's risk exposure and potential for cost savings over the 2072-day contract duration?

A firm fixed price contract shifts most of the cost risk to the contractor, providing the government with budget certainty. For a long duration like 2072 days, this structure protects against cost overruns due to inflation or unforeseen production issues. However, it may also mean the government forgoes potential savings if the contractor's actual costs are significantly lower than anticipated.

What is the long-term strategic implication of awarding a large contract for mechanical power transmission equipment to a single, large manufacturer without small business involvement?

The long-term strategic implication could include reduced competition in the future if smaller businesses are consistently excluded from opportunities. It may also lead to a dependency on a single supplier for critical components, potentially impacting supply chain resilience. While ensuring immediate needs are met, it warrants consideration for fostering a broader industrial base for future procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingEngine, Turbine, and Power Transmission Equipment ManufacturingMechanical Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: VEHICULAR EQUIPMENT COMPONENTS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Allison Transmission Inc

Address: 4700 W 10TH ST, INDIANAPOLIS, IN, 46222

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2004-04-29

Current End Date: 2009-12-31

Potential End Date: 2009-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-02

More Contracts from Allison Transmission, Inc.

View all Allison Transmission, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending