DoD's $11M Water Utility Contract Faces Limited Competition, Raising Cost Concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,060,176 ($11.1M)
Contractor: Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2024-10-01
End Date: 2025-09-30
Contract Duration: 364 days
Daily Burn Rate: $30.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Other
Official Description: CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR UTILITY SERVICES (WATER) FY25 OCT - AUG
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.1 million to FOREIGN UTILITY CONSOLIDATED REPORTING for work described as: CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR UTILITY SERVICES (WATER) FY25 OCT - AUG Key points: 1. Significant spending on essential water utility services for the Department of the Army. 2. Contract awarded under 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', indicating potential lack of robust price discovery. 3. Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) contract type introduces risk of cost escalation. 4. The $11M expenditure for a 12-month period warrants scrutiny for value and efficiency.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's $11M value for 12 months of water utility services is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts to ensure fair pricing. The EPA clause adds further uncertainty to the final cost.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract is listed as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION', suggesting a limited competitive environment. This lack of competition can lead to higher prices as there is less incentive for the contractor to offer the most cost-effective solution.
Taxpayer Impact: Limited competition may result in taxpayers paying more than necessary for essential water utility services.
Public Impact
Ensures critical water supply for military operations. Potential for increased costs due to limited competition and EPA. Transparency in pricing and service delivery is crucial for accountability.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Economic Price Adjustment (EPA)
- Lack of clear benchmark for pricing
Positive Signals
- Ensures essential service delivery
- Definitive contract provides clear terms
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under utility services, specifically water supply, which is critical for base operations. Spending benchmarks for such services can vary widely based on location, infrastructure needs, and service scope. The $11M for a single year suggests a significant operational requirement.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or set-asides for small businesses in this contract. Further investigation would be needed to determine if small businesses had an opportunity to compete or participate as subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status requires robust oversight to ensure the government is receiving fair value and that the contractor is meeting all performance requirements. Regular reviews of the EPA adjustments are also essential.
Related Government Programs
- Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Limited competition
- Economic Price Adjustment (EPA)
- Potential for cost overruns
- Lack of transparency in pricing justification
- No clear small business participation noted
Tags
water-supply-and-irrigation-systems, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.1 million to FOREIGN UTILITY CONSOLIDATED REPORTING. CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR UTILITY SERVICES (WATER) FY25 OCT - AUG
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FOREIGN UTILITY CONSOLIDATED REPORTING.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2024-10-01. End: 2025-09-30.
What specific factors led to the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' determination for this water utility contract?
The determination of 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' typically arises from unique circumstances, such as the existence of a single capable provider due to geographic isolation, specialized infrastructure, or proprietary technology. Without further details, it's difficult to ascertain the precise justification. Understanding this reason is key to assessing whether the limited competition was unavoidable or a result of inadequate market research.
How will the Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause impact the final cost, and what mechanisms are in place to control potential inflation?
The EPA clause allows for adjustments to the contract price based on fluctuations in specific economic indicators, such as labor or material costs. This introduces uncertainty regarding the final expenditure. Effective oversight requires clear, pre-defined indices for adjustment and regular reviews to ensure that increases are justified and do not exceed reasonable market trends, thereby protecting taxpayer funds from excessive inflation.
What performance metrics and quality assurance measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and reliability of the water utility services provided?
Ensuring the effectiveness of water utility services necessitates clearly defined performance standards, service level agreements, and rigorous quality assurance protocols. This includes regular testing of water quality, monitoring of supply reliability, and prompt response to any service disruptions. Robust oversight should involve independent verification of these metrics to guarantee that the services meet the required operational standards and public health regulations.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Utilities › Water, Sewage and Other Systems › Water Supply and Irrigation Systems
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,060,176
Exercised Options: $11,060,176
Current Obligation: $11,060,176
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2024-10-01
Current End Date: 2025-09-30
Potential End Date: 2025-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-11-26
More Contracts from Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY23 1ST QTR — $114.9M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY22 1ST QTR — $96.0M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY24 1ST QTR — $93.5M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY20 1ST QTR — $93.4M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY25 OCT - AUG — $84.0M (Department of Defense)
View all Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)