DoD's $28.4M Utility Services Contract Faces Limited Competition, Raising Cost Concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $28,441,334 ($28.4M)
Contractor: Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-10-01
End Date: 2024-09-30
Contract Duration: 365 days
Daily Burn Rate: $77.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Other
Official Description: CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR UTILITY SERVICES (HEAT) FY24 1ST QTR.
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $28.4 million to FOREIGN UTILITY CONSOLIDATED REPORTING for work described as: CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR UTILITY SERVICES (HEAT) FY24 1ST QTR. Key points: 1. Significant spending on essential utility services for the Department of the Army. 2. Limited competition raises questions about price discovery and potential overspending. 3. Fixed-price contract with economic adjustment introduces cost volatility. 4. Lack of small business participation noted.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $28.4M for one year of utility services appears high given the limited competition. Benchmarking against similar utility contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns, but the lack of competitive bidding suggests potential for inflated pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract is not available for competition, indicating a limited or sole-source award. This significantly restricts price discovery and negotiation leverage, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competitive bidding limits the government's ability to secure the best possible price, potentially resulting in millions of taxpayer dollars being spent inefficiently.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential heating and cooling services due to a lack of competitive bidding. The fixed-price with economic adjustment clause could lead to unexpected cost increases. The absence of small business participation limits opportunities for smaller, potentially more cost-effective providers.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition
- Economic price adjustment
- No small business participation
Positive Signals
- Definitive contract awarded
- Clear service period
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under general utility services, specifically steam and air-conditioning supply, crucial for facility operations. Spending benchmarks for such services vary widely based on location, scale, and specific utility types, but competitive procurement is key to achieving favorable rates.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. This is a missed opportunity to leverage potentially more agile and cost-effective small businesses in the utility services sector.
Oversight & Accountability
The limited competition nature of this contract warrants close oversight to ensure the government is receiving fair value. Robust justification for the non-competitive award and regular reviews of the economic price adjustment are essential.
Related Government Programs
- Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition
- Potential for overpayment
- Economic price adjustment risk
- No small business inclusion
Tags
steam-and-air-conditioning-supply, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $28.4 million to FOREIGN UTILITY CONSOLIDATED REPORTING. CONSOLIDATED REPORT FOR UTILITY SERVICES (HEAT) FY24 1ST QTR.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FOREIGN UTILITY CONSOLIDATED REPORTING.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $28.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-10-01. End: 2024-09-30.
What is the specific justification for awarding this utility services contract on a limited competition basis, and what steps are being taken to ensure fair pricing?
The justification for limited competition is crucial for understanding potential cost impacts. Agencies must provide detailed documentation explaining why full and open competition was not feasible. Oversight should focus on verifying this justification and ensuring the pricing mechanism, including economic adjustments, is rigorously monitored to prevent excessive costs and protect taxpayer funds.
How does the economic price adjustment clause in this fixed-price contract potentially impact the final cost to taxpayers, especially in volatile energy markets?
The economic price adjustment (EPA) clause allows for contract price changes based on fluctuations in specific economic factors, such as fuel costs or labor indices. In volatile markets, this can lead to significant cost increases beyond the initial fixed price, potentially exceeding budget allocations and increasing the overall burden on taxpayers. Careful monitoring and negotiation of EPA triggers are vital.
What is the long-term strategy for ensuring competitive sourcing of utility services to achieve better value and support small business participation?
A long-term strategy should involve proactive market research to identify potential competitors, including small businesses, for future utility service needs. Breaking down large contracts into smaller, more manageable lots could also encourage broader participation. Regularly reviewing contract types and procurement methods will help ensure sustained competition and optimize value for taxpayer dollars.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Utilities › Water, Sewage and Other Systems › Steam and Air-Conditioning Supply
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Foreign Owned, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $28,441,334
Exercised Options: $28,441,334
Current Obligation: $28,441,334
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-10-01
Current End Date: 2024-09-30
Potential End Date: 2024-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-11-06
More Contracts from Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY23 1ST QTR — $114.9M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY22 1ST QTR — $96.0M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY24 1ST QTR — $93.5M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY20 1ST QTR — $93.4M (Department of Defense)
- Consolidated Report for Utility Services (electricity Competed) FY25 OCT - AUG — $84.0M (Department of Defense)
View all Foreign Utility Consolidated Reporting federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)