DoD's $21.6M Acquisition Support Services Contract Awarded Without Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $21,622,539 ($21.6M)
Contractor: Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2012-09-27
End Date: 2013-05-31
Contract Duration: 246 days
Daily Burn Rate: $87.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: ACQUISTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $21.6 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED) for work described as: ACQUISTION SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Significant spending on acquisition support services by the Department of the Army. 2. Lack of disclosed domestic awardees raises transparency concerns. 3. Contract awarded as firm fixed price, indicating clear cost expectations. 4. The 'All Other Support Services' NAICS code suggests a broad scope, potentially lacking specificity.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The total award amount of $21.6M for acquisition support services is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was 'NOT COMPETED,' indicating a limited competition approach. This method can lead to higher prices and reduced innovation compared to full and open competition.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not have received the best possible value for these acquisition support services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential acquisition support services due to the absence of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense's reliance on non-competed contracts can limit visibility into spending efficiency. Lack of transparency regarding awardees hinders public scrutiny of government contracting practices.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Undisclosed awardees
- Broad service category
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed price contract type
Sector Analysis
Acquisition support services fall under professional services, often crucial for government agencies managing complex projects. Benchmarks for this sector vary widely based on the specific services rendered.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis is needed to assess small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED' status warrants further oversight to ensure the justification for limited competition was sound and that proper procedures were followed.
Related Government Programs
- All Other Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpricing and reduced value for taxpayer money.
- Undisclosed awardees limit transparency and public accountability.
- The broad 'All Other Support Services' category may obscure the true nature and cost of the services procured.
- Potential for contractor lock-in due to non-competitive award.
Tags
all-other-support-services, department-of-defense, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $21.6 million to DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED). ACQUISTION SUPPORT SERVICES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DOMESTIC AWARDEES (UNDISCLOSED).
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $21.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-09-27. End: 2013-05-31.
What was the specific justification for not competing this acquisition support services contract?
The provided data does not specify the justification for not competing the contract. Typically, justifications for sole-source or limited competition awards include reasons such as urgent and compelling needs, unique capabilities of a specific contractor, or when only one responsible source exists. Without this information, it's impossible to evaluate the validity of the non-competitive award.
How does the $21.6M cost compare to similar, competitively awarded acquisition support contracts?
Direct comparison is challenging without knowing the precise scope of 'All Other Support Services' and without data on competitively awarded contracts for identical services. However, a lack of competition generally suggests a higher likelihood of inflated costs compared to what might be achieved through a competitive bidding process, where multiple vendors vie for the contract.
What measures are in place to ensure the effectiveness and quality of services provided under this non-competed contract?
While the contract type is firm fixed price, which incentivizes cost control, effectiveness and quality depend heavily on the government's contract management and oversight. Robust performance metrics, regular reviews, and clear deliverables are essential to ensure the services meet the Department of the Army's needs, even without the initial competitive pressure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Other Support Services › All Other Support Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1800 F ST NW, WASHINGTON, DC, 20405
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,622,539
Exercised Options: $21,622,539
Current Obligation: $21,622,539
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-09-27
Current End Date: 2013-05-31
Potential End Date: 2013-05-31 12:05:00
Last Modified: 2023-03-28
More Contracts from Domestic Awardees (undisclosed)
- Overseas Contract — $920.0M (Agency for International Development)
- Afghanistan Ministry of Interior/Afghan National Police Mentoring&training With Life Support Services — $876.2M (Department of Defense)
- Tasm-O Aviation Field Maintenance Igf::ot::igf — $870.9M (Department of Defense)
- Overseas Contract — $817.4M (Department of State)
- Overseas Contract — $806.0M (Department of State)
View all Domestic Awardees (undisclosed) federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)