DoD awards $51.8M for Medium Caliber Ammunition to Northrop Grumman, with competition impacting price

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,819,832 ($51.8M)

Contractor: Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2018-09-06

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 2,793 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION

Place of Performance

Location: RADFORD, RADFORD CITY County, VIRGINIA, 24143

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $51.8 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION for work described as: MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION Key points: 1. Significant contract value for essential defense materiel. 2. Northrop Grumman is a major defense contractor, indicating established capabilities. 3. Full and open competition after exclusion of sources suggests a complex procurement process. 4. Long contract duration (2018-2026) implies sustained demand and potential for price fluctuations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's total value is $51.8M over nearly 8 years. Without specific unit cost data or benchmarks for medium caliber ammunition, a precise value assessment is difficult. The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method may have influenced pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The procurement method 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that while competition was sought, specific sources were initially excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of competition and its downward pressure on price. The final awardee was selected through a competitive process.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award, despite the exclusion of some sources, aims to secure reasonable pricing for taxpayers. However, the complexity of the procurement method warrants scrutiny for potential inefficiencies.

Public Impact

Ensures supply of critical ammunition for military operations. Supports a major defense contractor and its supply chain. Potential for price volatility due to long-term contract and specific competition method. Impacts readiness and operational capabilities of the armed forces.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Complexity of competition method ('after exclusion of sources')
  • Long contract duration without clear unit cost benchmarks
  • Lack of small business participation indicated

Positive Signals

  • Award to a reputable, large defense contractor
  • Ensures supply of critical defense materiel
  • Competitive award process

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the manufacturing sector, specifically ammunition production. Defense spending on ammunition is a significant portion of the overall defense budget, driven by operational needs and strategic stockpiling. Benchmarks for such specialized manufacturing can vary widely.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates no specific small business participation (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the prime contract was awarded to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses may be limited to subcontracting roles, which are not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method suggests a potentially complex oversight process. Further review would be needed to ensure the exclusion criteria were justified and that the subsequent competition effectively managed costs and ensured accountability.

Related Government Programs

  • Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for higher costs due to limited initial competition.
  • Long contract duration increases risk of price escalation.
  • Lack of transparency on specific unit costs.
  • No indicated small business participation.

Tags

ammunition-except-small-arms-manufacturi, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $51.8 million to NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION. MEDIUM CALIBER AMMUNITION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2018-09-06. End: 2026-04-30.

What was the rationale for excluding specific sources in the initial phase of this full and open competition?

The rationale for excluding specific sources in a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' typically involves factors such as national security concerns, proprietary technology, or a determination that only certain qualified entities could meet the stringent technical or performance requirements. This method aims to balance broad competition with the need for specialized capabilities, but requires clear justification to avoid limiting market access unnecessarily.

How does the long contract duration (2018-2026) impact the risk of cost overruns or underperformance?

A long contract duration like this increases the risk of cost overruns due to potential inflation, changes in material costs, and evolving technological requirements. It also presents a risk of underperformance if the contractor's capabilities degrade or if market conditions shift, making the fixed-price terms less favorable. Robust contract management, including regular performance reviews and potential price adjustment clauses, is crucial to mitigate these risks.

What is the estimated taxpayer impact of the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method compared to standard full and open competition?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method can have a mixed taxpayer impact. While it aims for competition among qualified bidders, the initial exclusion might reduce the number of potential offerors, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly unrestricted competition. However, if the exclusion is necessary for specialized requirements, it could ensure a higher quality outcome, potentially reducing long-term costs associated with performance failures or rework.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingAmmunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Northrop Grumman Corporation

Address: 4700 NATHAN LN N, PLYMOUTH, MN, 55442

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,819,832

Exercised Options: $51,819,832

Current Obligation: $51,819,832

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $4,909,209

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W52P1J18D0092

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2018-09-06

Current End Date: 2026-04-30

Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 12:04:00

Last Modified: 2025-09-23

More Contracts from Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation

View all Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending