DoD's $20M Administrative Management Contract with Chenega Decision Sciences Faces Competition Concerns
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,010,264 ($20.0M)
Contractor: Chenega Decision Sciences LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-02-12
End Date: 2019-12-22
Contract Duration: 1,409 days
Daily Burn Rate: $14.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF
Place of Performance
Location: LORTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22079
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.0 million to CHENEGA DECISION SCIENCES LLC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management services. 2. Significant spending of $20M over its duration. 3. Awarded on a non-competitive basis, raising questions about price discovery. 4. Services fall under the professional services sector.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract's Time and Materials pricing structure, combined with a lack of competition, makes a direct pricing assessment difficult. Without competitive benchmarks, it's hard to determine if the $20M spent represents fair value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited approach to sourcing. This lack of competition likely hindered robust price discovery and potentially led to higher costs for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the absence of competitive bidding, as the government did not benefit from market-driven price reductions.
Public Impact
Government reliance on a single vendor for critical administrative management services. Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competitive pressure. Limited transparency in how funds were allocated for services rendered.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Time and Materials pricing
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Contract completed
- Services provided by established vendor
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. Benchmarks for similar contracts are difficult to establish due to the non-competitive nature of this award.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award (sb: false). There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific contract.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded and completed, suggesting some level of oversight. However, the non-competitive nature raises questions about the effectiveness of oversight in ensuring optimal value for taxpayer dollars.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for cost overruns due to T&M pricing
- Limited transparency on service value
- No small business participation noted
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.0 million to CHENEGA DECISION SCIENCES LLC. IGF::OT::IGF
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CHENEGA DECISION SCIENCES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-02-12. End: 2019-12-22.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a limited/non-competitive basis?
The provided data states the contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' (ct: 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION'). However, the specific justification or documentation supporting this determination is not included. Typically, such justifications would involve reasons like urgent need, sole-source provider capabilities, or specific government-unique requirements that preclude full and open competition.
How did the Time and Materials pricing impact the overall cost compared to a fixed-price contract?
Time and Materials (T&M) contracts can lead to higher costs if not carefully managed, as they reimburse the contractor for direct labor hours and costs, plus a fee. Without competition, it's challenging to assess if the T&M pricing was efficient. A fixed-price contract might have offered more cost certainty if the scope was well-defined, but T&M can be suitable for evolving requirements.
What were the key performance metrics or deliverables for these administrative management services?
The provided data does not detail the specific deliverables or key performance indicators (KPIs) for the administrative management and general management consulting services. Understanding these would be crucial for evaluating the effectiveness and value received by the Department of the Army, especially given the contract's non-competitive award and T&M structure.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 10505 FURNACE RD STE 205, LORTON, VA, 22079
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,010,264
Exercised Options: $20,010,264
Current Obligation: $20,010,264
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-02-12
Current End Date: 2019-12-22
Potential End Date: 2019-12-22 12:12:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-17
More Contracts from Chenega Decision Sciences LLC
- TO Provide Program Management Support Services (pmss) for Army Human Resource Systems (ahrs) — $25.8M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)