DoD awards $25.7M contract to L3 Technologies for satellite communication terminal support, lacking competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,689,587 ($25.7M)

Contractor: L3 Technologies, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2014-09-09

End Date: 2017-03-31

Contract Duration: 934 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: AWARD AN UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT TO L3 FOR COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT VERY SMALL APERTURE TERMINALS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS TERMINALS REFURBISH AND NON-WARRANTY PARTS.

Place of Performance

Location: VICTOR, ONTARIO County, NEW YORK, 14564

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.7 million to L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC. for work described as: AWARD AN UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT TO L3 FOR COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT VERY SMALL APERTURE TERMINALS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS TERMINALS REFURBISH AND NON-WARRANTY PARTS. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to L3 Technologies for combat services support and terminal refurbishment. 2. Significant spending on non-warranty parts and refurbishment for satellite communication systems. 3. Lack of competition raises concerns about price discovery and potential overspending. 4. The contract spans nearly three years, indicating a substantial operational need.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $25.7 million for refurbishment and parts is substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price is optimal compared to market rates for similar services and parts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This significantly limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these services and parts, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the lack of competitive bidding. Essential combat services support relies on potentially non-competitive procurement. The long duration of the contract suggests ongoing reliance on these specific services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The telecommunications sector, particularly satellite communications, involves complex and often specialized equipment. Spending benchmarks can vary widely based on technology and service level agreements.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to L3 Technologies, Inc., a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in the subcontracting or prime contracting opportunities for this award.

Oversight & Accountability

The non-competed nature of this award warrants further oversight to ensure fair pricing and efficient use of funds. Accountability for the justification of sole-source procurement is crucial.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

all-other-telecommunications, department-of-defense, ny, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.7 million to L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC.. AWARD AN UNDEFINITIZED CONTRACT TO L3 FOR COMBAT SERVICES SUPPORT VERY SMALL APERTURE TERMINALS TRANSMISSION SYSTEMS SATELLITE COMMUNICATIONS TERMINALS REFURBISH AND NON-WARRANTY PARTS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is L3 TECHNOLOGIES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2014-09-09. End: 2017-03-31.

What is the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of viable alternatives. Without this justification, it's impossible to assess the fairness of the pricing. The government should have conducted a price analysis based on historical data, commercial pricing, or other available benchmarks to ensure the $25.7 million was reasonable.

What is the long-term strategy for maintaining and refurbishing these satellite communication terminals, and will future procurements be competed?

The long-term strategy is unclear from this award alone. Future procurements should ideally be competed to leverage market competition and achieve better value. If specific sustainment capabilities are required, a competitive process should still be used to identify the most cost-effective provider.

How does the cost of non-warranty parts impact the overall cost-effectiveness of this contract compared to alternatives?

Procuring non-warranty parts can be significantly more expensive than using parts covered under warranty or sourced competitively. This practice inflates the contract's total cost. The government should explore options for obtaining parts under warranty or through competitive bidding to reduce overall expenditure.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationOther TelecommunicationsAll Other Telecommunications

Product/Service Code: COMM/DETECT/COHERENT RADIATION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7640 OMNITECH PL, VICTOR, NY, 14564

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,689,587

Exercised Options: $25,689,587

Current Obligation: $25,689,587

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2014-09-09

Current End Date: 2017-03-31

Potential End Date: 2017-03-31 12:03:00

Last Modified: 2023-06-30

More Contracts from L3 Technologies, Inc.

View all L3 Technologies, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending