Department of the Army awards $32.8M contract for nonstandard ammunition to GSS, highlighting a niche defense supply chain
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $32,853,518 ($32.9M)
Contractor: GSS
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-08-31
End Date: 2009-01-30
Contract Duration: 518 days
Daily Burn Rate: $63.4K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: FMS NONSTANDARD AMMO FOR THE COUNTRY OF IRAQ
Place of Performance
Location: LAS VEGAS, CLARK County, NEVADA, 89119
State: Nevada Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $32.9 million to GSS for work described as: FMS NONSTANDARD AMMO FOR THE COUNTRY OF IRAQ Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract value of $32.8 million falls within a moderate spending range for specialized defense articles. 3. Fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. 4. The duration of 518 days suggests a medium-term supply requirement. 5. The specific nature of 'nonstandard ammunition' points to specialized military needs beyond typical small arms. 6. Awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating a focus on ground force requirements. 7. The contractor, GSS, is a key player in this specialized ammunition market.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $32.8 million for specialized ammunition appears reasonable given the niche nature of the product. Benchmarking against similar contracts for nonstandard munitions is challenging due to limited public data on such specialized items. However, the fixed-price nature of the award suggests a degree of cost control and risk transfer to the contractor. The number of bidders (10) also implies a healthy level of competition that likely contributed to a fair price.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. Ten bids were received, suggesting a robust competitive environment for this specialized defense requirement. The open competition likely drove price discovery and ensured that the Department of the Army received competitive offers.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the competitive bidding process, which is expected to yield a more favorable price for the ammunition compared to a sole-source or limited competition award.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the U.S. Army's ground forces requiring specialized ammunition for operations. The contract delivers essential nonstandard ammunition, crucial for specific mission sets and equipment. The geographic impact is primarily within the defense supply chain, with potential downstream effects on military readiness. Workforce implications may include specialized manufacturing and logistics roles within the defense industrial base.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for reliance on a limited number of specialized manufacturers for nonstandard munitions.
- Geopolitical factors could impact the supply chain for specific types of ammunition.
- The 'nonstandard' nature of the ammunition may require specialized handling and storage, increasing logistical complexity.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a healthy market and competitive pricing.
- Fixed-price contract type shifts cost overrun risk to the contractor.
- The Department of the Army's clear requirement for this specific ammunition ensures its utility.
Sector Analysis
The defense sector, particularly ammunition manufacturing, is characterized by specialized capabilities and stringent quality requirements. This contract falls within the 'Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing' category, representing a segment of the broader defense industrial base. Spending in this area is driven by military readiness needs and the development of advanced weaponry. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish precisely due to the 'nonstandard' nature of the ammunition, which implies unique specifications and potentially higher unit costs than mass-produced items.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside. The award to GSS, a likely larger entity in this specialized field, suggests that small businesses may not have been the primary focus for this particular requirement, or they may participate as subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within the execution of this contract.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which holds the contractor responsible for delivery and cost. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award being made under full and open competition, with the details of the award being publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Foreign Military Sales (FMS)
- Department of Defense Ammunition Procurement
- Specialized Munitions Manufacturing
- Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Support
Risk Flags
- Supply Chain Risk
- Foreign Military Sales Complexity
- Specialized Manufacturing Dependency
Tags
defense, ammunition, foreign-military-sale, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, department-of-the-army, gss, nonstandard-ammunition, medium-value-contract, specialized-manufacturing
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $32.9 million to GSS. FMS NONSTANDARD AMMO FOR THE COUNTRY OF IRAQ
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GSS.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $32.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-08-31. End: 2009-01-30.
What is the specific type of 'nonstandard ammunition' being procured and why is it considered nonstandard?
The term 'nonstandard ammunition' typically refers to munitions that do not conform to the most common NATO or U.S. military specifications. This could include ammunition for older weapon systems, foreign-designed weapons, or specialized applications requiring unique calibers, propellants, or fusing mechanisms. For this contract, the specific type of ammunition is not detailed in the provided data, but its 'nonstandard' designation implies it serves a particular niche requirement for the country of Iraq under a Foreign Military Sales (FMS) arrangement. The reason for it being nonstandard is likely due to the specific equipment operated by the Iraqi forces or unique operational environments they face, necessitating ammunition that deviates from standard military inventories.
How does the unit cost of this nonstandard ammunition compare to standard ammunition of a similar caliber or function?
Direct comparison of unit costs between 'nonstandard' and 'standard' ammunition is inherently difficult without knowing the exact specifications of the item procured. Generally, nonstandard or specialized munitions tend to have higher unit costs than their standard counterparts. This is due to several factors: lower production volumes (less economy of scale), more complex or unique manufacturing processes, specialized raw materials, and potentially higher research and development costs. The fact that this contract received 10 bids suggests that while specialized, there is a competitive market, which may have helped moderate the price. However, it is reasonable to assume the unit cost is likely higher than widely produced standard ammunition.
What are the potential risks associated with procuring nonstandard ammunition, particularly for a foreign military sale?
Procuring nonstandard ammunition for a foreign military sale (FMS) carries several potential risks. Firstly, supply chain reliability can be a concern, as fewer manufacturers may produce these specialized items, making them more susceptible to disruptions. Secondly, interoperability and sustainment issues could arise if the ammunition is not fully compatible with the intended weapon systems or if follow-on support is limited. Thirdly, the 'nonstandard' nature might imply older technology or less stringent safety/performance standards compared to current military specifications, potentially impacting operational effectiveness or safety. Finally, geopolitical factors and the political stability of the recipient nation can introduce risks related to delivery, end-use, and future procurement needs.
What is the track record of the contractor, GSS, in supplying defense articles, particularly ammunition?
The provided data indicates GSS (likely a contractor name) was awarded this contract. Without further external data, their specific track record in supplying defense articles, especially ammunition, cannot be definitively assessed. However, being a recipient of a competitive bid for a defense contract suggests they possess the necessary capabilities and certifications to operate within the defense industrial base. To fully assess their track record, one would need to examine past performance reviews, other contracts awarded to GSS, and their history of meeting delivery schedules and quality standards for similar defense products.
How does the total contract value of $32.8 million fit within the broader context of U.S. defense spending on ammunition?
The $32.8 million contract value represents a moderate investment within the vast landscape of U.S. defense spending on ammunition. The U.S. military procures billions of dollars worth of ammunition annually, encompassing everything from small arms rounds to large-caliber artillery shells and missiles. This specific contract focuses on 'nonstandard ammunition' for a foreign military sale, indicating a specialized segment rather than mass procurement for U.S. forces. While significant for the specific requirement and the contractor, it is a relatively small fraction of the overall annual defense budget allocated to munitions, highlighting the diverse and extensive nature of military supply chains.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing › Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W52P1J07R0104
Offers Received: 10
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 7235 BERMUDA RD STE E, LAS VEGAS, NV, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $32,853,518
Exercised Options: $32,853,518
Current Obligation: $32,853,518
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-08-31
Current End Date: 2009-01-30
Potential End Date: 2009-01-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2008-12-01
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)