DoD's Army Spent $11.17M on Tube and Strap Assemblies from Rolling Hills Progress Center, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $11,172,068 ($11.2M)
Contractor: Rolling Hills Progress Center, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-08-03
End Date: 2013-02-28
Contract Duration: 2,036 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.5K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: TUBE AND STRAP ASSEMBLIES
Place of Performance
Location: LANARK, CARROLL County, ILLINOIS, 61046
State: Illinois Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $11.2 million to ROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CENTER, INC for work described as: TUBE AND STRAP ASSEMBLIES Key points: 1. The contract for Tube and Strap Assemblies represents a significant expenditure of over $11 million. 2. Competition was not available for this contract, raising questions about price discovery. 3. The contract duration of 2036 days (over 5 years) suggests a long-term need. 4. The sector is Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing, a critical defense area.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract was awarded on a Firm Fixed Price basis. However, with no competition available and a significant contract value, it is difficult to assess if the pricing is optimal without further benchmarks.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a limited source selection. This lack of competition may have impacted the government's ability to secure the best possible price.
Taxpayer Impact: The $11.17 million expenditure represents taxpayer funds allocated to a specific defense need without the benefit of competitive bidding.
Public Impact
Taxpayers funded over $11 million for specialized defense components. The long contract duration implies a sustained demand for these assemblies within the Army's operations. The lack of competition raises concerns about potential inefficiencies in government procurement for this item.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Long contract duration without clear justification for sole-source
- No benchmark data available for price comparison
Positive Signals
- Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty if negotiated well
- Awarded to a specific company, potentially supporting a niche supplier
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing sector, a critical component of defense readiness. Spending benchmarks for such specialized components are often difficult to ascertain due to unique requirements and limited market size.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether Rolling Hills Progress Center, Inc. is a small business. Further investigation would be needed to determine the impact on small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded in 2007 and ended in 2013. Oversight would have focused on contract performance and adherence to terms during that period. Post-award review of the sole-source justification would be relevant.
Related Government Programs
- Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competition raises concerns about price fairness.
- Potential for overpayment due to absence of competitive bidding.
- Long contract duration without clear competitive justification.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
- Limited transparency on the specific technical requirements driving the sole-source award.
Tags
ammunition-except-small-arms-manufacturi, department-of-defense, il, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $11.2 million to ROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CENTER, INC. TUBE AND STRAP ASSEMBLIES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ROLLING HILLS PROGRESS CENTER, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $11.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-08-03. End: 2013-02-28.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a limited/sole-source basis, and were alternative solutions explored?
The provided data states 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' implying a limited or sole-source award. A thorough review would require accessing the contract file to understand the specific justification, such as unique technical requirements, proprietary technology, or urgent need. Without this, it's impossible to confirm if alternatives were adequately explored or if the limited competition was truly unavoidable.
How does the unit cost of these tube and strap assemblies compare to similar components or historical pricing, given the lack of competition?
Direct comparison is challenging due to the 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status and the absence of specific unit cost data. The total award value of $11.17 million over potentially multiple units makes a per-unit calculation difficult without knowing the quantity. Benchmarking against similar defense components would require detailed specifications and market research, which is not provided here.
What was the overall effectiveness of this contract in meeting the Department of the Army's needs for ammunition components?
Effectiveness is difficult to gauge solely from the contract data. While the contract was fulfilled between 2007 and 2013, its success would depend on factors like delivery timeliness, quality of the tube and strap assemblies, and their performance in the intended ammunition systems. The long duration suggests a consistent need, but actual operational impact is unknown.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing › Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W52P1J07R0075
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 201 STATE RTE 64, LANARK, IL, 17
Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $11,172,068
Exercised Options: $11,172,068
Current Obligation: $11,172,068
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-08-03
Current End Date: 2013-02-28
Potential End Date: 2013-02-28 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-11-27
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)