DoD Awards $39.5M Contract for Small Arms Components to Best Tool & Manufacturing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $39,509,768 ($39.5M)

Contractor: Best Tool and Manufacturing CO., Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-17

End Date: 2011-07-29

Contract Duration: 2,325 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200506!001507!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !W52H0905C0071 !A!N! !N! ! !20050317!20061028!007143548!007143548!007143548!N!BEST TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO !3515 NE 33RD TER !KANSAS CITY !MO!64117!38000!095!29!KANSAS CITY !JACKSON !MISSOURI !+000003563290!N!N!000000000000!1005!GUNS, THROUGH 30 MM !A5 !WEAPONS !000 !* !332994!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !A!U!J!2!006!K! !A!N!A! ! !N!B!Y!N! ! !C! !B!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: KANSAS CITY, CLAY County, MISSOURI, 64117

State: Missouri Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $39.5 million to BEST TOOL AND MANUFACTURING CO., INC. for work described as: 200506!001507!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !W52H0905C0071 !A!N! !N! ! !20050317!20061028!007143548!007143548!007143548!N!BEST TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO !3515 NE 33RD TER !KANSAS CITY !MO!64117!38000!095!29!KANSAS CITY !JACK… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $39.5 million, is for small arms components. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, suggesting a potentially competitive process. 3. The fixed-price contract type indicates a defined cost for the government. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically related to ordnance and accessories manufacturing.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $39.5 million for small arms components appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar DoD contracts for specialized manufacturing would provide a more precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded, potentially impacting price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The $39.5 million award represents taxpayer investment in defense readiness, with the pricing determined through a competitive process.

Public Impact

Ensures the availability of critical small arms components for military operations. Supports a manufacturing company in Missouri, contributing to the local and state economy. The contract duration of over 2300 days highlights a long-term need for these components.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Potential for price escalation over the contract's long duration.
  • Dependence on a single contractor for critical components.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting potential for good value.
  • Fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically the manufacturing of small arms and ordnance. Spending in this area is critical for national security and is subject to rigorous procurement standards.

Small Business Impact

The awardee, Best Tool & Manufacturing Co., Inc., is a private company. Further analysis would be needed to determine if they qualify as a small business for the purpose of subcontracting goals.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, indicating oversight by a major defense agency. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method suggests a structured procurement process.

Related Government Programs

  • Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Long contract duration may lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
  • Potential for supply chain disruptions if the sole contractor faces issues.
  • The exclusion of sources warrants scrutiny to ensure fairness and optimal pricing.
  • Lack of specific component details limits immediate assessment of criticality.

Tags

small-arms-ordnance-and-ordnance-accesso, department-of-defense, mo, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $39.5 million to BEST TOOL AND MANUFACTURING CO., INC.. 200506!001507!2100!W52H09!TACOM ROCK ISLAND !W52H0905C0071 !A!N! !N! ! !20050317!20061028!007143548!007143548!007143548!N!BEST TOOL & MANUFACTURING CO !3515 NE 33RD TER !KANSAS CITY !MO!64117!38000!095!29!KANSAS CITY !JACKSON !MISSOURI !+000003563290!N!N!000000000000!1005!GUNS, THROUGH 30 MM !A5 !WEAPONS !000 !* !332994!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BEST TOOL AND MANUFACTURING CO., INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $39.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-17. End: 2011-07-29.

What specific small arms components are being procured under this contract?

The data indicates the Product Service Code (PSC) is 1005, which covers 'Guns, Through 30 MM.' This suggests the components are related to firearms and their associated parts, but the exact nature of the components requires further detailed contract review.

What were the reasons for excluding certain sources in the competition?

The contract notes 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' The specific justification for excluding certain sources is not provided in this summary data. Typically, such exclusions are based on technical capabilities, past performance, or specific requirements outlined in the solicitation.

How does the $39.5 million value compare to similar contracts for ordnance manufacturing?

Without access to a comprehensive database of similar ordnance manufacturing contracts, a direct comparison is difficult. However, $39.5 million over approximately 6.4 years (2325 days) suggests a significant, ongoing need for these components, implying a substantial but potentially fair market value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingSmall Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: WEAPONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3515 NE 33RD TER, KANSAS CITY, MO, 05

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business, Woman Owned Business

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-03-17

Current End Date: 2011-07-29

Potential End Date: 2011-07-29 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2009-12-30

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending