DoD awards $7.8M for Europe infrastructure modernization, with TYTO Government Solutions Inc. leading the effort
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $7,791,955 ($7.8M)
Contractor: Tyto Government Solutions Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-07-13
End Date: 2028-09-24
Contract Duration: 1,900 days
Daily Burn Rate: $4.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS
Sector: IT
Official Description: COMMERCIAL DELIVERY ORDER TO SURVEY, ENGINEER, FURNISH, INSTALL, SECURE, AND TEST (SEFIS&T) A TURNKEY SOLUTION FOR THE EUROPE INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION CAPABILITIES SET (IMCS) CONTRACT
Place of Performance
Location: HERNDON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20170
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $7.8 million to TYTO GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC for work described as: COMMERCIAL DELIVERY ORDER TO SURVEY, ENGINEER, FURNISH, INSTALL, SECURE, AND TEST (SEFIS&T) A TURNKEY SOLUTION FOR THE EUROPE INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION CAPABILITIES SET (IMCS) CONTRACT Key points: 1. The contract focuses on a turnkey solution for infrastructure modernization in Europe, indicating a strategic investment in operational capabilities. 2. Competition was full and open, suggesting a robust market response and potential for competitive pricing. 3. The contract type is Time and Materials, which can present cost control challenges if not closely monitored. 4. Performance is expected over approximately five years, allowing for phased implementation and adaptation. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541519 points to a broad range of computer-related services, encompassing IT and potentially other technical support. 6. The award is a Delivery Order under a larger contract vehicle, suggesting it's part of a broader strategic procurement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $7.8 million for a five-year period for infrastructure modernization appears reasonable given the scope of services, which include engineering, installation, and testing. However, without specific benchmarks for similar turnkey solutions in European military infrastructure, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The Time and Materials pricing structure warrants close scrutiny to ensure costs remain within projected limits and do not escalate due to inefficiencies or scope creep. Comparing this to other large-scale IT and infrastructure projects within the DoD could provide further context on its cost-effectiveness.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The presence of four bidders (no=4) suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this type of service. This competitive environment is generally favorable for price discovery and can lead to more cost-effective solutions for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and encouraging contractors to offer their best value propositions.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, is the primary beneficiary, aiming to modernize critical infrastructure in Europe. Services delivered include survey, engineering, furnishing, installation, securing, and testing of a turnkey solution. The geographic impact is focused on Europe, supporting U.S. military operations and personnel stationed there. Workforce implications may include specialized technical roles for installation, engineering, and IT support, potentially creating or sustaining jobs in relevant fields.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
- The broad scope of 'Other Computer Related Services' might obscure specific cost drivers.
- Long performance period (approx. 5 years) increases exposure to potential changes in technology or requirements.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
- Turnkey solution approach can streamline project delivery and reduce coordination overhead.
- Award to a single entity (TYTO Government Solutions Inc.) can ensure cohesive project execution.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT and professional services sector, specifically focusing on infrastructure modernization. The market for such services is substantial, driven by ongoing needs for technological upgrades and operational support for government and commercial entities globally. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve large-scale IT integration, network infrastructure deployment, and facility modernization projects. The NAICS code 541519, 'Other Computer Related Services,' covers a wide array of activities, including IT consulting, system integration, and technical support, indicating a broad market for these specialized skills.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss=false, sb=false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. However, the prime contractor, TYTO Government Solutions Inc., may choose to subcontract portions of the work to small businesses as part of their overall project execution strategy, which could provide opportunities within the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement, delivery schedules, and quality assurance provisions. Transparency is typically facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- DoD IT Modernization Programs
- European Infrastructure Support Contracts
- Army IT Services Contracts
- Turnkey Solution Delivery Orders
- Defense Infrastructure Modernization
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
- Complexity of managing a 'turnkey solution' across multiple European locations.
- Ensuring interoperability of new infrastructure with existing military systems.
- Geopolitical factors in Europe could impact project timelines or security.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical infrastructure modernization.
Tags
department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, it-services, infrastructure-modernization, europe, delivery-order, time-and-materials, full-and-open-competition, tyto-government-solutions-inc, naics-541519, professional-services, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $7.8 million to TYTO GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC. COMMERCIAL DELIVERY ORDER TO SURVEY, ENGINEER, FURNISH, INSTALL, SECURE, AND TEST (SEFIS&T) A TURNKEY SOLUTION FOR THE EUROPE INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATION CAPABILITIES SET (IMCS) CONTRACT
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TYTO GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-07-13. End: 2028-09-24.
What is TYTO Government Solutions Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale infrastructure modernization contracts, particularly within European operational theaters?
Assessing TYTO Government Solutions Inc.'s track record requires a review of their past performance on contracts with similar scope, complexity, and geographic focus. Specifically, their experience with 'turnkey solutions' for infrastructure modernization, especially in overseas or European contexts, is crucial. This would involve examining contract databases for awards to TYTO for projects involving survey, engineering, installation, and testing of complex systems. Performance metrics from previous contracts, such as on-time delivery, budget adherence, and quality of work, would provide key insights. A history of successful, similar projects would indicate a lower performance risk for this current contract, while a lack of relevant experience might raise concerns about their ability to execute effectively.
How does the $7.8 million cost compare to similar infrastructure modernization projects undertaken by the DoD or other federal agencies in Europe?
Benchmarking the $7.8 million cost against similar projects is essential for evaluating value for money. This comparison should ideally focus on contracts for 'turnkey solutions' involving IT infrastructure, engineering, installation, and testing within European operational environments. Factors such as the scale of the modernization (e.g., number of facilities, network capacity), the specific technologies deployed, and the duration of the project need to be considered. If comparable projects have a significantly lower cost for a similar scope, it could indicate that this contract is overpriced. Conversely, if the scope is more extensive or complex than benchmarks, the cost might be justified. Data from federal procurement databases (like FPDS) and agency budget reports can aid in this comparative analysis.
What are the primary risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for this type of infrastructure modernization, and how are they being mitigated?
The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract is the potential for cost overruns, as the government pays for the actual labor hours and materials used, plus a fixed fee or percentage. This structure can incentivize contractors to extend project timelines or use more resources than strictly necessary if oversight is insufficient. For this infrastructure modernization contract, risks include scope creep, inefficient labor utilization, and escalating material costs. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust government oversight, including detailed monitoring of labor hours and material invoices, establishing clear ceilings on expenditures, and defining specific deliverables and milestones. Strong contract administration and regular performance reviews are critical to managing T&M contracts effectively and ensuring value for taxpayers.
What is the expected impact of this contract on the modernization of U.S. military capabilities in Europe?
This contract is expected to significantly enhance U.S. military capabilities in Europe by modernizing essential infrastructure. A 'turnkey solution' implies a comprehensive approach to upgrading systems, which could lead to improved network reliability, enhanced communication systems, increased operational efficiency, and better security for critical facilities. Modernized infrastructure is fundamental for supporting advanced military operations, enabling faster deployment of resources, and ensuring seamless command and control. The project's success could directly translate into improved readiness and effectiveness of U.S. forces operating in the European theater, contributing to regional stability and security objectives.
How does the current spending on this contract align with historical trends for similar infrastructure modernization efforts within the Department of Defense?
Analyzing historical spending trends for similar DoD infrastructure modernization efforts provides context for the $7.8 million award. This involves examining past budgets allocated to European infrastructure projects, IT upgrades, and facility modernization over several fiscal years. Trends might reveal whether spending in this area is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. Comparing the current contract's value to the average cost and scale of previous projects helps determine if it represents a typical investment or an outlier. Understanding these historical patterns can inform assessments of the contract's financial significance and its place within the DoD's long-term strategic investments in its European posture.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services
Product/Service Code: HARDWARE AND ABRASIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 4
Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 11950 DEMOCRACY DR STE 650, RESTON, VA, 20190
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $7,791,955
Exercised Options: $7,791,955
Current Obligation: $7,791,955
Actual Outlays: $759,640
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W52P1J18DA127
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-07-13
Current End Date: 2028-09-24
Potential End Date: 2028-09-24 12:09:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Tyto Government Solutions Inc
- 200408!000211!1700!A8303 !naval AIR Warfare Center Trainin!n6133900d0706 !A!N! !N!0004 ! !20040329!20070930!009683442!009683442!006980080!n!at&t Government Solutions, INC!1900 Gallows Road !vienna !va!22182!81072!059!51!vienna !fairfax !virginia !+000002500000!n!n!000000000000!6910!training Aids !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipment !000 !* !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20080919!B! ! !n!z!a!u!u!2!002!b! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $98.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200608!600411!2100!w909my!usa Communications-Electronics !gs35f4507g !C!N! !y!w909my06f0022! !20060601!20110531!009683442!009683442!006980080!n!at&t Government Solutions, INC!1900 Gallows RD STE 105 !vienna !va!22182!29008!059!51!fort Belvoir !fairfax !virginia !+000004232766!n!n!000000000000!r425!engineering Technical Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !518210!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !C!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !2100!W909MY!0001! ! — $95.7M (Department of Defense)
- Unified Capabilities Soft Client Subscription Services — $91.9M (Department of Defense)
- Operations and Product Support Services III OPS-3: Engineering and Life-Cycle Product Support — $62.6M (General Services Administration)
- Operations and Product Support Services — $53.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)