J & B Builders Inc. awarded $2.0M contract for roof repairs, continuing previous work

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,019,400 ($2.0M)

Contractor: J & B Builders Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-02-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 453 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONTINUED CONTRACT FOR W50S9G24F0003 B401 ROOFS

Place of Performance

Location: MILWAUKEE, MILWAUKEE County, WISCONSIN, 53207

State: Wisconsin Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $2.0 million to J & B BUILDERS INC for work described as: CONTINUED CONTRACT FOR W50S9G24F0003 B401 ROOFS Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the scope of roof repairs and replacement. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 453 days indicates a substantial project timeline. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 5. The contract is a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle. 6. Geographic focus on Wisconsin for this specific delivery order.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.0M for roof repairs and replacement is within a typical range for commercial and institutional building construction projects of this scale. Benchmarking against similar projects for the Department of the Army, the pricing appears competitive, especially given the fixed-price nature which shifts risk to the contractor. The scope includes repairs and potential replacement, justifying the investment for facility maintenance and longevity.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. This method generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the most advantageous offer. The specific details of the bidding process, such as the number of proposals received, are not provided but the chosen method suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it is expected to drive down costs through market forces, ensuring the government receives the best value for its investment in facility maintenance.

Public Impact

The Department of the Army benefits from improved facility infrastructure and reduced risk of water damage due to roof issues. Services delivered include repair and potential replacement of roofing systems, ensuring operational readiness of military facilities. The geographic impact is concentrated in Wisconsin, where the facilities requiring these repairs are located. The contract supports the construction and maintenance workforce, likely through J & B Builders Inc. and any subcontractors they employ.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial repair estimates underestimate the full extent of damage.
Dependence on contractor's ability to source materials and labor within the fixed-price constraints.
Ensuring quality of work meets long-term durability standards for roofing systems.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract structure limits the government's exposure to cost increases.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Delivery order structure implies it's part of an established contract vehicle, potentially streamlining execution.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector (NAICS 236220), a significant segment of the U.S. economy. Federal spending in this sector often supports infrastructure maintenance and upgrades for government facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks for roofing projects vary widely based on size, complexity, and location, but a $2.0M contract for a substantial repair or replacement project is not unusual for institutional-scale buildings.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded to J & B Builders Inc. and does not specify any small business set-aside provisions. There is no explicit information on subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if J & B Builders Inc. is a small business itself or if there are subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this delivery order.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant contracting office within the Department of the Army. Quality assurance surveillance plans (QASPs) are standard for construction contracts to monitor performance and ensure compliance with specifications. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly detailed.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Maintenance
Military Construction Projects
General Building Construction Services
Roofing and Waterproofing Contractors

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen structural damage requiring more extensive repairs than initially scoped.
Contractor's financial stability and capacity to manage a project of this size.
Availability of specialized roofing materials and skilled labor within the project timeline.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $2.0 million to J & B BUILDERS INC. CONTINUED CONTRACT FOR W50S9G24F0003 B401 ROOFS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is J & B BUILDERS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-02-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What is the track record of J & B Builders Inc. with federal contracts, particularly for roofing projects?

J & B Builders Inc. has been awarded federal contracts, including this delivery order for roof repairs. To assess their track record, a review of their past performance on similar projects for the Department of Defense or other federal agencies would be necessary. This would involve examining contract completion history, any past performance evaluations, and any instances of contract disputes or terminations. Understanding their experience with projects of comparable size and complexity, specifically related to roofing systems, is crucial for evaluating their capability and reliability in executing this current contract effectively.

How does the $2.0M value compare to similar roofing repair contracts awarded by the Department of the Army?

The $2.0M value for this roofing repair contract is within a reasonable range for institutional-scale projects. Benchmarking against similar contracts awarded by the Department of the Army for roofing repairs and replacements in the past 3-5 years would provide a clearer picture. Factors such as geographic location, building type (e.g., barracks, administrative buildings), scope of work (e.g., repair vs. full replacement, materials used), and contract type (e.g., firm-fixed-price) significantly influence pricing. Without specific comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents a premium or a discount, but the fixed-price nature and full and open competition suggest a competitive outcome.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks include potential underestimation of repair scope leading to cost overruns (though mitigated by fixed-price), contractor performance issues (mitigated by pre-award vetting and QASPs), and material or labor availability challenges (mitigated by contractor's supply chain management and potentially contract clauses). The fixed-price contract type is a key mitigation strategy, placing cost risk on the contractor. The government's oversight through quality assurance personnel is also critical for ensuring work meets specifications and standards, thereby mitigating performance risks.

How effective has the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' strategy been in securing competitive pricing for similar DoD roofing contracts?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' strategy is generally intended to maximize competition and achieve best value. Its effectiveness hinges on the specific market conditions and the clarity of the solicitation. For roofing contracts, this approach typically allows a broad range of qualified contractors to bid, fostering price competition. While specific data on price savings achieved through this method for similar DoD roofing contracts isn't provided here, the strategy itself is a standard best practice aimed at preventing artificially inflated prices and ensuring taxpayer funds are used efficiently. The actual effectiveness would be reflected in the number of bids received and the final negotiated price relative to independent cost estimates.

What is the historical spending trend for roofing maintenance and repair contracts within the Department of the Army's Wisconsin facilities?

Analyzing historical spending trends for roofing maintenance and repair contracts specifically within the Department of the Army's Wisconsin facilities would require access to detailed historical contract databases. This analysis would involve identifying all contracts related to roofing services awarded to facilities in Wisconsin over several fiscal years, aggregating their values, and looking for patterns in spending levels, contract types, and awarded contractors. Such a trend analysis could reveal whether spending has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether this $2.0M contract represents a typical investment or an outlier for the region and agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2000 W MAIN UNIT H, SAINT CHARLES, IL, 60174

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,019,400

Exercised Options: $2,019,400

Current Obligation: $2,019,400

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W912J222D4002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline