Department of the Army awards $9M contract for B180 renovation to Mayrant & Associates, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,019,805 ($9.0M)

Contractor: Mayrant & Associates, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2024-11-12

End Date: 2026-08-03

Contract Duration: 629 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BASE BID FOR LRXQ172402 RENOVATE B180

Place of Performance

Location: FLOWOOD, RANKIN County, MISSISSIPPI, 39232

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $9.0 million to MAYRANT & ASSOCIATES, LLC for work described as: BASE BID FOR LRXQ172402 RENOVATE B180 Key points: 1. The contract's base value of $9.02M appears reasonable for a building renovation of this scope. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of 629 days indicates a significant project timeline. 4. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. The award to Mayrant & Associates, LLC, a relatively new entity, warrants monitoring. 6. The project is located in Mississippi, potentially impacting local construction employment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The base bid of $9.02M for the B180 renovation is within a typical range for commercial and institutional building construction projects of this scale. Benchmarking against similar renovation contracts awarded by the Department of the Army or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the fixed-price nature of the contract, the onus is on the contractor to manage costs effectively to ensure profitability, which can be a positive indicator for the government if executed well.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which typically means that after an initial exclusion of certain sources, the remaining opportunities were competed openly. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition. While more bidders could potentially drive prices lower, three offers generally indicate that the market was sufficiently engaged to provide a basis for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value through a broad market solicitation, encouraging competitive pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Department of the Army, which will receive renovated facilities at B180. The contract will deliver essential building renovation services, improving infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the facility in Mississippi where the renovation will take place. The project is expected to create or sustain jobs within the construction sector in Mississippi. The renovation will likely improve the functionality and safety of the B180 building for its occupants.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Contractor's track record for large-scale federal renovations is not yet established.
Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during the extensive renovation.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage a 629-day project timeline effectively.

Positive Signals

Fixed-price contract structure incentivizes contractor efficiency and cost control.
Full and open competition suggests a robust bidding process.
The project addresses a clear need for facility improvement within the Army.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the federal contracting market. The Department of Defense is a major consumer of construction services, frequently awarding contracts for new builds, renovations, and maintenance of its vast infrastructure. Spending in this sector is influenced by infrastructure needs, modernization efforts, and base realignments. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale renovation projects within the federal government, particularly those managed by military branches.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While Mayrant & Associates, LLC is listed with a 'MS' status, further clarification would be needed to determine if they qualify as a small business for this specific award. The absence of explicit small business set-aside requirements means that subcontracting opportunities for small businesses will depend on the prime contractor's own initiatives and the nature of the work required.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily be managed by the Department of the Army contracting and project management offices. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver the specified renovation within the agreed-upon price and schedule. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction may be invoked if fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Facilities Renovation Projects
Army Corps of Engineers Construction Contracts
Federal Building Modernization Programs
Commercial and Institutional Building Construction Services

Risk Flags

Contractor Performance Risk
Schedule Adherence Risk
Potential for Unforeseen Conditions
Quality Control Concerns

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $9.0 million to MAYRANT & ASSOCIATES, LLC. BASE BID FOR LRXQ172402 RENOVATE B180

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MAYRANT & ASSOCIATES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-11-12. End: 2026-08-03.

What is the track record of Mayrant & Associates, LLC with federal contracts, particularly in large-scale renovations?

As of the data provided, Mayrant & Associates, LLC is the awardee of this $9.02M contract. Information regarding their prior federal contract history, especially for projects of similar magnitude and complexity in building renovation, is not detailed here. A deeper dive into the System for Award Management (SAM) and other federal procurement databases would be necessary to ascertain their past performance, including any previous awards, contract values, and client agencies. Understanding their experience with firm-fixed-price contracts and project durations exceeding 600 days is crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute this B180 renovation.

How does the $9.02M base bid compare to similar federal building renovation contracts?

The $9.02M base bid for the B180 renovation is a significant investment. To benchmark its value, one would compare it against recently awarded federal contracts for similar-sized institutional or commercial building renovations, considering factors like geographic location, scope of work (e.g., structural, MEP, finishes), and age/condition of the facility being renovated. For instance, if similar projects in the Southeast region averaged between $7M and $11M with comparable scopes, this award would appear to be within a reasonable market range. Without specific comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or merely fair value.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions common in renovations, contractor performance issues impacting schedule adherence, and quality control failures. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract structure mitigates cost overrun risk for the government by placing the financial responsibility on the contractor. Mitigation for performance and quality risks relies on robust government oversight, including regular site inspections, progress reviews, and adherence to contract milestones. The contractor's own risk mitigation strategies, such as detailed planning and contingency allocation, are also critical.

What is the expected effectiveness of the B180 renovation in meeting the Department of the Army's facility needs?

The effectiveness hinges on the precise scope of work defined in the contract and the quality of execution. Assuming the renovation addresses critical infrastructure deficiencies, modernizes systems (like HVAC, electrical, plumbing), and improves space utilization, it should significantly enhance the functionality, safety, and operational efficiency of the B180 facility. The 629-day duration suggests a comprehensive overhaul rather than superficial upgrades. Successful completion, as measured by meeting performance specifications and user satisfaction, will indicate its effectiveness in supporting the Army's mission requirements at that location.

How does historical spending on building renovations by the Department of the Army compare to this award?

The Department of the Army consistently allocates substantial funds towards maintaining and modernizing its vast real estate portfolio. Historical spending data would reveal a pattern of significant annual investments in construction and renovation across numerous installations. This $9.02M award, while substantial for a single project, likely represents a fraction of the Army's total annual construction budget. Analyzing trends in average contract values, project types (renovation vs. new construction), and geographic distribution of spending over the past 5-10 years would provide context for this specific award's place within the larger spending picture.

What is the significance of the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' award type?

This award type signifies a competitive procurement process that aimed for broad participation. 'Full and Open Competition' is the preferred method, ensuring the widest possible range of potential contractors can bid. The 'After Exclusion of Sources' clause suggests that certain entities might have been initially excluded based on specific criteria (e.g., pre-qualification, specific capabilities), but the remaining pool was then competed openly. This approach balances the desire for maximum competition with the need to ensure bidders possess necessary qualifications, ultimately aiming for the best value for the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W50S7H23B0001

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1303 VINE ST, JACKSON, MS, 39202

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,019,805

Exercised Options: $9,019,805

Current Obligation: $9,019,805

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 1

Total Subaward Amount: $398,453

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline