DoD Awards $17.8M for Modeling & Analysis Support to General Atomics Aeronautical Systems
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $17,825,026 ($17.8M)
Contractor: General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2023-09-28
End Date: 2026-03-27
Contract Duration: 911 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.6K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: UNDER THIS TASK ORDER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY THEIR MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FRAMEWORK, IN SUPPORT OF THE ANALYSIS CONDUCTED BY FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS (FFRDCS)
Place of Performance
Location: POWAY, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92064
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $17.8 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: UNDER THIS TASK ORDER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY THEIR MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FRAMEWORK, IN SUPPORT OF THE ANALYSIS CONDUCTED BY FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS (FFRDCS) Key points: 1. Contract focuses on Modeling, Simulation, and Analysis (MS&A) framework. 2. Supports Federally Funded Research and Development Centers (FFRDCs) in their analysis. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Army, a significant defense sector. 4. The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, indicating potential for cost overruns.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to higher costs than fixed-price contracts if not managed carefully. Benchmarking CPFF contracts in R&D is difficult due to inherent variability.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, suggesting a sole-source award. Lack of competition limits price discovery and may result in a higher price than if multiple vendors had bid.
Taxpayer Impact: Without competition, taxpayers may be paying a premium for these MS&A services.
Public Impact
Supports critical research and development efforts within the Department of Defense. Enhances analytical capabilities for FFRDCs, potentially leading to better defense strategies. The use of MS&A frameworks is crucial for complex defense system development and evaluation.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
Positive Signals
- Supports critical R&D
- Enhances FFRDC capabilities
- Utilizes advanced MS&A frameworks
Sector Analysis
This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Spending in this area is critical for technological advancement but requires careful oversight to ensure value for money.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific provisions or considerations for small businesses in this contract award.
Oversight & Accountability
The CPFF structure necessitates robust oversight to manage costs and ensure the contractor remains within the fixed fee parameters. The lack of competition also warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing.
Related Government Programs
- Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
- CPFF contract type poses cost overrun risks.
- Limited transparency on specific MS&A framework.
- Potential for inflated costs due to lack of competition.
Tags
research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $17.8 million to GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC.. UNDER THIS TASK ORDER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EMPLOY THEIR MODELING, SIMULATION, AND ANALYSIS (MS&A) FRAMEWORK, IN SUPPORT OF THE ANALYSIS CONDUCTED BY FEDERALLY FUNDED RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTERS (FFRDCS)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL ATOMICS AERONAUTICAL SYSTEMS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $17.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2023-09-28. End: 2026-03-27.
What specific MS&A framework is being employed, and how does it compare to industry standards for similar R&D support contracts?
The specific MS&A framework is not detailed in the provided data. A thorough review would require access to the task order's statement of work. Comparing it to industry standards would involve analyzing the framework's capabilities, methodologies, and documented successes in similar research and development contexts to ensure it aligns with best practices and offers optimal value.
Given the sole-source nature, what steps were taken to ensure the fixed fee is reasonable and reflects fair market value for the services rendered?
Without competition, ensuring a reasonable fixed fee relies heavily on the agency's pre-award market research and cost analysis. This would typically involve comparing the proposed costs to historical data for similar services, consulting independent cost estimates, and potentially engaging with subject matter experts to validate the pricing structure and ensure it aligns with fair market value.
How will the effectiveness of the MS&A support be measured, particularly in relation to the FFRDCs' analytical outcomes and overall defense objectives?
Effectiveness measurement should be tied to specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound (SMART) goals outlined in the task order. This could include metrics related to the accuracy and timeliness of analyses, the impact of the MS&A support on FFRDC decision-making, and the ultimate contribution to achieving key defense objectives. Regular performance reviews and milestone assessments are crucial.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › C – National Defense R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 14200 KIRKHAM WAY, POWAY, CA, 92064
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $17,825,026
Exercised Options: $17,825,026
Current Obligation: $17,825,026
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 5
Total Subaward Amount: $1,234,968
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W31P4Q22D0025
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2023-09-28
Current End Date: 2026-03-27
Potential End Date: 2026-03-27 12:03:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-25
More Contracts from General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc.
- Requirement IS for the Procurement of Performance Based Logistics Support Services for the MQ-1C Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System — $1.9B (Department of Defense)
- Award of Undefinitized Contract Action (UCA) for FY 12 MQ-1C Gray Eagle Program of Record and Quick Reaction Capability Performance-Based Logistics Product Support — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- FY 13 Full Rate Production of the Gray Eagle Unmanned Aircraft System and FY 12 Backfill Requirements — $1.1B (Department of Defense)
- FY17 Gray Eagle Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Effort — $936.9M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $646.6M (Department of Defense)
View all General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)