Raytheon Company awarded $368M contract for Kuwait's Patriot missile system modernization

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $368,272,371 ($368.3M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-06-23

End Date: 2022-03-28

Contract Duration: 2,104 days

Daily Burn Rate: $175.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: MODERNIZATION OF SIX PATRIOT FIRE UNITS FOR THE STATE OF KUWAIT IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: ANDOVER, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01810

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $368.3 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: MODERNIZATION OF SIX PATRIOT FIRE UNITS FOR THE STATE OF KUWAIT IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded for modernization of six Patriot fire units, indicating a significant investment in regional defense capabilities. 2. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential cost efficiencies and market-driven pricing. 3. The duration of the contract (2104 days) suggests a complex, long-term modernization effort. 4. The fixed-price incentive contract type aims to balance cost control with contractor performance. 5. This award falls under the Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing sector, a critical component of national defense. 6. The contract's value of $368 million represents a substantial allocation of resources for military hardware upgrades.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without specific details on the modernization scope and comparable international sales. However, the significant dollar amount suggests a substantial undertaking. The fixed-price incentive structure implies an expectation of cost control, but the lack of competition limits the ability to assess if the pricing is truly market-competitive. Further analysis would require understanding the specific technological upgrades included and comparing them to similar international procurements.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning it was not open to competitive bidding. This approach is often used when a specific contractor possesses unique capabilities or when there is a critical need that cannot be met through a competitive process. The lack of competition means that the government did not benefit from the price discovery and potential cost savings that typically arise from multiple bidders vying for a contract.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the absence of competitive pressure, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple vendors had been considered.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the State of Kuwait, which will receive modernized defense systems, and Raytheon Company, the contractor. The services delivered include the modernization of six Patriot fire units, enhancing air and missile defense capabilities. The geographic impact is focused on Kuwait, bolstering its national security infrastructure. Workforce implications include potential job creation and sustainment within Raytheon and its supply chain, particularly in specialized defense manufacturing and engineering roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits price competition, potentially increasing costs for taxpayers.
  • Long contract duration (2104 days) increases exposure to potential cost overruns or scope creep.
  • Fixed-price incentive contract requires careful monitoring to ensure contractor performance aligns with cost objectives.
  • Reliance on a single contractor for critical defense modernization may pose supply chain risks.

Positive Signals

  • Modernization of critical defense assets enhances regional security and interoperability.
  • Fixed-price incentive contract structure provides some incentive for cost efficiency.
  • Award to a known, experienced contractor like Raytheon suggests a focus on reliability and proven technology.
  • Contract supports a key U.S. ally, strengthening diplomatic and security ties.

Sector Analysis

The defense sector, particularly the air and missile defense segment, is characterized by high technological complexity and significant government investment. Contracts for advanced weapon systems like the Patriot are typically awarded to a limited number of specialized manufacturers. The market size for such systems is substantial, driven by global security concerns and the need for advanced threat deterrence. This contract fits within the broader category of defense procurement, focusing on upgrades and sustainment of existing platforms.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without specific set-aside goals or subcontracting requirements, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is likely minimal, though Raytheon's overall supply chain may include small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting command, with potential involvement from the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA). Inspector General (IG) oversight is standard for Department of Defense contracts, ensuring accountability and investigating potential fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be sensitive.

Related Government Programs

  • Patriot Missile System Sustainment
  • Foreign Military Sales - Air Defense Systems
  • Guided Missile Manufacturing
  • Defense Article Modernization
  • U.S. Army Weapon Systems Procurement

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns due to contract type and duration
  • Reliance on a single supplier for critical defense modernization

Tags

defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, raytheon-company, kuwait, patriot-missile-system, air-and-missile-defense, foreign-military-sales, sole-source, definitive-contract, fixed-price-incentive, guided-missile-and-space-vehicle-manufacturing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $368.3 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. MODERNIZATION OF SIX PATRIOT FIRE UNITS FOR THE STATE OF KUWAIT IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $368.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-06-23. End: 2022-03-28.

What specific modernization upgrades are included in this contract for the six Patriot fire units?

The provided data does not specify the exact modernization upgrades included in the contract for the six Patriot fire units. However, typical Patriot modernization efforts focus on enhancing capabilities such as improved missile interceptors, upgraded radar and command-and-control systems, enhanced electronic warfare resistance, and integration with newer network-centric warfare architectures. These upgrades aim to counter evolving threats, including ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, and advanced aircraft. The 'MODERNIZATION OF SIX PATRIOT FIRE UNITS' designation suggests a comprehensive overhaul rather than a minor upgrade, likely encompassing hardware, software, and potentially training components to ensure the system remains effective against contemporary and future aerial threats.

How does the $368 million contract value compare to typical modernization costs for Patriot systems?

The $368 million contract value for modernizing six Patriot fire units represents a significant investment. While precise comparisons are difficult without knowing the specific scope of modernization and the baseline configuration of the systems, historical data suggests that major overhauls of Patriot systems can range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars per battery or fire unit, depending on the extent of upgrades. Factors influencing cost include the age of the existing systems, the technological advancements being incorporated (e.g., new interceptor missiles, radar enhancements, software updates), and the specific requirements of the purchasing nation. Given the scale of six fire units, this contract appears to be within the expected range for substantial modernization, though without detailed scope, a precise value benchmark is elusive.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source contract for advanced defense systems?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source contract for advanced defense systems like the Patriot missile system include a lack of competitive pricing, potentially leading to higher costs for the government and taxpayers. Without competition, there is reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or offer the most cost-effective solutions. Furthermore, sole-source awards can limit the government's options if the chosen contractor faces performance issues, supply chain disruptions, or significant price increases. There's also a risk of vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch providers or integrate alternative technologies in the future. This approach necessitates robust government oversight to mitigate these risks.

What is the significance of the 'Fixed Price Incentive' (FPI) contract type in this context?

The Fixed Price Incentive (FPI) contract type is designed to share the risks and rewards between the government and the contractor. In an FPI contract, there is a target cost, a target profit, and a price ceiling. If the final cost is below the target cost, both parties share in the savings according to a predetermined formula. Conversely, if the final cost exceeds the target cost but remains below the ceiling, the profit is reduced, and the government pays the final cost plus the reduced profit. If the final cost exceeds the price ceiling, the contractor absorbs the additional cost. This structure incentivizes the contractor to control costs while ensuring the government is protected by the price ceiling. For a complex modernization project like this, FPI aims to balance the need for cost control with the inherent uncertainties of advanced technology development and integration.

How does this contract align with broader U.S. foreign military sales and defense cooperation objectives?

This contract aligns with broader U.S. foreign military sales (FMS) and defense cooperation objectives by providing a key U.S. ally, Kuwait, with advanced air and missile defense capabilities. Strengthening the defense posture of allies enhances regional stability and security, which is a core tenet of U.S. foreign policy. By equipping allies with sophisticated U.S.-made defense systems, the U.S. promotes interoperability with its own forces and fosters long-term security partnerships. Such sales also support the U.S. defense industrial base, sustaining jobs and technological expertise within companies like Raytheon. This specific contract contributes to the U.S. strategy of building partner capacity to address shared security challenges, particularly in volatile regions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingGuided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENTMODIFICATION OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W31P4Q16R0000

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE INCENTIVE (L)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: RTX Corp

Address: 350 LOWELL ST, ANDOVER, MA, 01810

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $635,199,381

Exercised Options: $368,272,371

Current Obligation: $368,272,371

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2069

Total Subaward Amount: $367,997,142

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2016-06-23

Current End Date: 2022-03-28

Potential End Date: 2022-03-28 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-04-22

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending