DoD awards Raytheon $24.9M for Patriot fuzes to Japan, raising concerns over sole-source procurement

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,885,296 ($24.9M)

Contractor: Raytheon Company

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-08-01

End Date: 2017-07-31

Contract Duration: 2,191 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: (PREDOMINANT) 9 NEW AND 27 UPGRADED PATRIOT FUZES FOR THE COUNTRY OF JAPAN.

Place of Performance

Location: ANDOVER, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01810

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $24.9 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: (PREDOMINANT) 9 NEW AND 27 UPGRADED PATRIOT FUZES FOR THE COUNTRY OF JAPAN. Key points: 1. High value contract for critical defense components. 2. Sole-source award to Raytheon limits competitive pricing. 3. Potential risk in reliance on a single supplier for essential munitions. 4. Spending falls within the 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts' manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $24.9 million for 36 fuzes (9 new, 27 upgraded) appears high on a per-unit basis, especially given the lack of competition. Benchmarking against similar sole-source procurements for advanced munitions components is difficult but suggests potential overpricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning only Raytheon Company was solicited. This significantly limits price discovery and competition, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competed procurement.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award may result in higher costs for the U.S. taxpayer, as competitive pressures that typically drive down prices were absent.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be paying a premium due to the lack of competition. Ensuring the long-term availability and affordability of critical defense components is vital. The U.S. government's reliance on sole-source contracts for specialized defense items warrants scrutiny.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source procurement
  • Lack of price competition
  • Potential for inflated costs

Positive Signals

  • Awarded to a known, capable supplier
  • Supports a key U.S. ally

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the 'Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector. Spending in this niche area is often characterized by high R&D costs and limited suppliers, making sole-source awards more common but still requiring careful justification.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to Raytheon Company, a large defense contractor. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific procurement, either as prime contractors or significant subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

While the Department of the Army awarded the contract, the lack of competition raises questions about the oversight applied to ensure fair and reasonable pricing. Further review of the justification for the sole-source award is recommended.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competitive pricing.
  • Potential for inflated costs due to limited competition.
  • Reliance on a single supplier for critical defense components.
  • Limited transparency in price justification.

Tags

other-guided-missile-and-space-vehicle-p, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $24.9 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. (PREDOMINANT) 9 NEW AND 27 UPGRADED PATRIOT FUZES FOR THE COUNTRY OF JAPAN.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-08-01. End: 2017-07-31.

What was the specific justification provided by the Department of the Army for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to Raytheon Company, and was this justification adequately vetted?

The justification for sole-source procurement typically centers on unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where only one source can fulfill the requirement. For this contract, the Army would need to demonstrate why only Raytheon could provide these specific Patriot fuzes, especially considering the long lead times and specialized nature of missile components. Adequate vetting would involve independent cost analysis and a thorough review of alternative solutions.

How does the per-unit cost of these Patriot fuzes compare to similar components procured competitively or through other allied nations' defense programs?

Without access to specific cost data and competitive benchmarks for advanced munitions components, a precise comparison is difficult. However, sole-source contracts inherently lack the downward price pressure of competition. If comparable fuzes were available through competitive bidding or if allied nations secured similar items at lower prices, it would indicate potential overpayment on this contract, highlighting a risk to taxpayer value.

What is the long-term strategic risk associated with relying on a single supplier for critical components like Patriot fuzes, particularly for a key ally like Japan?

The long-term strategic risk involves potential supply chain disruptions, price escalations due to vendor monopoly, and reduced innovation. If Raytheon faces production issues or decides to significantly increase prices, both the U.S. and Japan could face shortages or unexpected cost increases. This dependence also limits flexibility in sourcing and potentially hinders the development of alternative or improved technologies from other manufacturers.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingAerospace Product and Parts ManufacturingOther Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W31P4Q11R0018

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 350 LOWELL ST, ANDOVER, MA, 01810

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,885,296

Exercised Options: $24,885,296

Current Obligation: $24,885,296

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-08-01

Current End Date: 2017-07-31

Potential End Date: 2017-07-31 12:07:00

Last Modified: 2018-10-22

More Contracts from Raytheon Company

View all Raytheon Company federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending