DoD awards Raytheon $47M for aircraft parts, raising concerns over sole-source procurement
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $46,990,399 ($47.0M)
Contractor: Raytheon Company
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-01-31
End Date: 2010-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,976 days
Daily Burn Rate: $23.8K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Place of Performance
Location: ANDOVER, ESSEX County, MASSACHUSETTS, 01810
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $47.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY for work described as: Key points: 1. Significant contract value of $46.99M awarded to a major defense contractor. 2. Lack of competition raises questions about price discovery and potential overspending. 3. Long contract duration (1976 days) may indicate complex requirements or limited vendor pool. 4. The sector is dominated by large, established players, potentially limiting small business opportunities.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can incentivize higher costs. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if the $46.99M price is reasonable compared to market rates for similar aircraft parts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers as there was no market pressure to offer the best price.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition for this $46.99M contract means taxpayers may have paid more than necessary for these aircraft parts.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may be overpaying for essential aircraft parts due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long duration of the contract could impact the availability of parts and potentially lead to obsolescence issues. Reliance on a single source for critical components can create supply chain vulnerabilities for the Department of Defense.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Cost-plus contract type
- Long contract duration
- No small business participation indicated
Positive Signals
- Award to established contractor
- Potential for specialized parts
Sector Analysis
The 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector is crucial for defense readiness. Spending benchmarks are hard to establish without competitive data, but sole-source awards in this area warrant scrutiny.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates no small business participation in this contract. Given the sole-source nature and the large prime contractor, opportunities for small businesses were likely missed.
Oversight & Accountability
The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential lack of robust oversight in the initial procurement phase. Further review is needed to understand the justification for the sole-source award and ensure accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Defense Contract Management Agency Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source procurement
- Cost-plus contract type
- Lack of small business participation
- Long contract duration
- Potential for price inflation
- Limited market research evidence
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, ma, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $47.0 million to RAYTHEON COMPANY. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is RAYTHEON COMPANY.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $47.0 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-01-31. End: 2010-06-30.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative sourcing options thoroughly explored?
The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding potential value. Without competition, the government relies heavily on the contractor's proposed pricing. A thorough review would involve examining the necessity of unique capabilities, the unavailability of alternatives, and any market research conducted to ensure the government wasn't foregoing a more cost-effective solution.
How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact the final cost and the contractor's incentive to control expenses for these aircraft parts?
Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contracts reimburse the contractor for allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. While the fee is fixed, the contractor has less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts, as higher costs directly translate to higher reimbursements. This structure can lead to cost overruns if not closely monitored.
What is the potential long-term impact on the Department of Defense's supply chain and technological readiness given this sole-source, long-duration award?
A sole-source, long-duration contract can create dependency on a single supplier, potentially leading to supply chain vulnerabilities and reduced flexibility. It may also stifle innovation if alternative suppliers or newer technologies are not explored. This could impact the DoD's ability to adapt to evolving threats and maintain a diverse, resilient supply base.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: GUIDED MISSLES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 350 LOWELL ST, ANDOVER, MA, 06
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-01-31
Current End Date: 2010-06-30
Potential End Date: 2010-06-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2012-09-10
More Contracts from Raytheon Company
- Federal Contract — $5.7B (Department of Defense)
- TEN Fire Units for Qatar — $5.6B (Department of Defense)
- GPS Advanced Control Segment (OCX) Phase B Blocks 1 and 2 — $4.5B (Department of Defense)
- An/Spy-6(v) Hardware Production — $3.3B (Department of Defense)
- Predominant - Patriot UAE — $3.0B (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)