DoD's $26.1M Consulting Contract with Booz Allen Hamilton Faces Scrutiny for Value and Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,138,986 ($26.1M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2016-04-01
End Date: 2020-01-17
Contract Duration: 1,386 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF
Place of Performance
Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded for administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. is the sole contractor. 3. The contract duration was 1386 days. 4. Awarded under a full and open competition, but only one award was made. 5. The contract was a delivery order under a larger contract.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $26.1M over nearly four years for consulting services appears reasonable for the scope. However, without detailed task orders, a precise value assessment is difficult. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting engagements is needed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting an initial intent for broad market participation. However, only one award was made, raising questions about the effectiveness of the competition in driving down prices or ensuring the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds were used for consulting services. The value and effectiveness of these services directly impact the efficient use of taxpayer money.
Public Impact
Consulting services impact government efficiency and effectiveness. Potential for taxpayer funds to be used inefficiently if services are not well-defined or competitively priced. Transparency in contract awards is crucial for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition despite full and open solicitation.
- Lack of detailed task order information for granular value assessment.
- Potential for cost overruns if not managed tightly.
Positive Signals
- Awarded under a formal, open competition.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type can provide cost certainty.
- Contractor has a strong track record in government contracting.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically management consulting. Benchmarks for similar large-scale consulting contracts in the federal government can vary widely based on scope, duration, and specific expertise required.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this was a delivery order under a larger contract, and there is no specific information provided regarding small business participation. It is unclear if small businesses were subcontracted or if the prime contractor is a small business.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve the contracting officer's representative (COR) monitoring performance and deliverables. The Department of Defense has established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms to ensure contract compliance and accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition despite open solicitation.
- Lack of detailed task order data hinders granular value assessment.
- Unclear impact on small business participation.
- Need for performance data to fully assess value for money.
Tags
administrative-management-and-general-ma, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IGF::OT::IGF
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2016-04-01. End: 2020-01-17.
What specific management and administrative consulting services were rendered under this contract, and how did they contribute to the Department of the Army's mission objectives?
The contract focused on Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. While the specific deliverables are not detailed in the provided data, such services typically aim to improve organizational efficiency, strategic planning, process optimization, and resource management. The ultimate contribution to the Army's mission would depend on the successful implementation and impact of these consulting recommendations.
Given the full and open competition resulted in only one award, what factors might have limited broader participation or led to a single awardee, and what is the potential risk to price competitivenes
Limited participation in a full and open competition could stem from stringent qualification requirements, the complexity of the statement of work, or the perceived market size for the specific services. This single award might indicate a lack of robust competition, potentially leading to higher prices than if multiple qualified bidders had vied for the contract. It warrants further investigation into the solicitation's structure and bidder pool.
How effectively were taxpayer funds utilized for these consulting services, considering the contract's duration and value, and what mechanisms were in place to ensure accountability for performance?
Assessing the effective utilization of funds requires a review of performance metrics, deliverables, and the actual impact of the consulting services. The firm fixed-price nature provides some cost control, but accountability hinges on robust oversight by the COR, clear performance standards, and mechanisms for addressing deficiencies. Without post-award performance data, a definitive judgment on fund utilization is challenging.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,138,986
Exercised Options: $26,138,986
Current Obligation: $26,138,986
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 7
Total Subaward Amount: $636,465
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS00F008DA
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2016-04-01
Current End Date: 2020-01-17
Potential End Date: 2020-01-17 12:01:00
Last Modified: 2021-01-24
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)