DoD awards $20.9M contract for IPPS-A Increment I system integrator services to EDC Consulting, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,923,708 ($20.9M)
Contractor: EDC Consulting, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2013-08-15
End Date: 2016-06-14
Contract Duration: 1,034 days
Daily Burn Rate: $20.2K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: IT
Official Description: ISSUE A LETTER CONTRACT TO PROCURE SYSTEM INTEGRATOR SERVICES FOR DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION, TEST, IMPLEMENTATION AND FIELDING OF THE INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM ARMY (IPPS-A) INCREMENT I.
Place of Performance
Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22301
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.9 million to EDC CONSULTING, LLC for work described as: ISSUE A LETTER CONTRACT TO PROCURE SYSTEM INTEGRATOR SERVICES FOR DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION, TEST, IMPLEMENTATION AND FIELDING OF THE INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM ARMY (IPPS-A) INCREMENT I. Key points: 1. Contract awarded to EDC Consulting, LLC for critical personnel and pay system development. 2. The contract value is $20.9 million over a 1034-day period. 3. This procurement was not competed, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. The sector is IT, specifically custom computer programming services.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee type, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. Benchmarking is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers.
Taxpayer Impact: Lack of competition may lead to higher costs, impacting taxpayer value.
Public Impact
Development of the Integrated Personnel and Pay System Army (IPPS-A) is crucial for modernizing military HR and pay functions. The success of this system impacts all Army personnel, affecting pay accuracy and personnel management. A sole-source award necessitates close oversight to ensure fair pricing and effective service delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost-plus contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
Positive Signals
- Essential system development
- Defined contract period
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT sector, specifically custom computer programming services. IT services are a significant area of federal spending, with benchmarks varying widely based on complexity and scope.
Small Business Impact
The awardee, EDC Consulting, LLC, is not identified as a small business in the provided data. This contract does not appear to have specific small business set-aside provisions.
Oversight & Accountability
The sole-source nature of this contract requires robust oversight from the Department of the Army to ensure the contractor delivers services effectively and at a reasonable cost.
Related Government Programs
- Custom Computer Programming Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition.
- Cost-plus contract type increases risk of cost overruns.
- Potential for inadequate price negotiation without competition.
- Dependency on a single contractor for critical system development.
Tags
custom-computer-programming-services, department-of-defense, va, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.9 million to EDC CONSULTING, LLC. ISSUE A LETTER CONTRACT TO PROCURE SYSTEM INTEGRATOR SERVICES FOR DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, INTEGRATION, TEST, IMPLEMENTATION AND FIELDING OF THE INTEGRATED PERSONNEL AND PAY SYSTEM ARMY (IPPS-A) INCREMENT I.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is EDC CONSULTING, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.9 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2013-08-15. End: 2016-06-14.
What was the justification for not competing this contract, and what steps were taken to ensure a fair and reasonable price was negotiated?
The justification for not competing the contract is not provided in the data. To ensure a fair and reasonable price, the government typically conducts market research, analyzes cost proposals, and may use independent cost estimates. Without this information, it's difficult to assess the price discovery process.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how is performance being tracked to mitigate risks associated with a cost-plus contract?
Key performance indicators are not detailed in the provided data. For cost-plus contracts, performance tracking often involves monitoring cost expenditures against the fixed fee, evaluating schedule adherence, and assessing the quality of deliverables against technical requirements. Regular progress reports and audits are crucial.
How does the successful implementation of IPPS-A Increment I contribute to the overall modernization goals of the Department of the Army, and what is the projected return on investment?
IPPS-A Increment I aims to integrate personnel and pay systems, streamlining critical functions and improving data accuracy for the Army. This modernization is expected to reduce administrative burdens, enhance readiness, and provide better data for decision-making. The ROI is projected through efficiency gains and reduced operational costs.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1600 INTERNATIONAL DR STE 800, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $20,923,708
Exercised Options: $20,923,708
Current Obligation: $20,923,708
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 1
Total Subaward Amount: $150,150
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2013-08-15
Current End Date: 2016-06-14
Potential End Date: 2016-06-14 12:06:00
Last Modified: 2021-04-27
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)