DoD awards $29.9M for .50 Cal. Machine Guns to General Dynamics-OTS, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $29,939,474 ($29.9M)

Contractor: General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-03-31

End Date: 2011-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,217 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CAL. MACHINE GUN

Place of Performance

Location: WILLISTON, CHITTENDEN County, VERMONT, 05495

State: Vermont Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $29.9 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC. for work described as: LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CAL. MACHINE GUN Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, established manufacturer. 2. Significant investment in ordnance manufacturing. 3. Potential for cost overruns due to Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure. 4. Focus on defense sector, specifically small arms.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure suggests potential for costs to exceed initial estimates. Benchmarking against similar ordnance contracts is difficult without more detailed cost breakdowns.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition likely resulted in a higher price than a competed contract would have achieved.

Public Impact

Ensures supply of critical .50 caliber machine guns for military operations. Supports a specific defense contractor and its manufacturing capabilities. Potential for taxpayer funds to be used inefficiently due to sole-source award.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition.
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns.
  • Lack of transparency in pricing.

Positive Signals

  • Provides essential equipment for the armed forces.
  • Supports domestic manufacturing capabilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the defense sector, specifically in the manufacturing of small arms and ordnance. Spending benchmarks for such specialized military equipment are often opaque but are typically high due to R&D and production complexities.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have specific provisions for small business participation. The awardee is a large defense contractor, suggesting limited direct benefit to small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure fair pricing and efficient use of taxpayer funds. Oversight should focus on cost justification and performance metrics.

Related Government Programs

  • Small Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for cost overruns
  • Limited small business participation

Tags

small-arms-ordnance-and-ordnance-accesso, department-of-defense, vt, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $29.9 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC.. LIGHTWEIGHT .50 CAL. MACHINE GUN

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS-OTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $29.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-03-31. End: 2011-07-31.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis instead of competing it?

Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services, or when urgent and compelling circumstances prevent competition. For specialized military hardware like machine guns, this could be due to unique technical requirements, existing infrastructure, or specific security considerations that make competition impractical or detrimental to national security.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure impact the overall risk to the government?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure shifts some financial risk to the government. While the contractor receives a fixed fee, the government bears the risk of cost overruns. This can incentivize contractors to incur higher costs if they believe it will lead to a larger overall profit, necessitating robust government oversight to manage expenditures effectively.

What is the long-term strategic value of this procurement for the Department of Defense?

The long-term strategic value lies in ensuring the continued availability of a critical weapon system. Procuring .50 caliber machine guns supports infantry, vehicle, and aircraft operations. Maintaining a reliable supply chain and manufacturing capability for such essential ordnance is vital for force readiness and national defense posture.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingSmall Arms, Ordnance, and Ordnance Accessories Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENTC – National Defense R&D Services

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 128 LAKESIDE AVE, BURLINGTON, VT, 00

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,939,474

Exercised Options: $29,939,474

Current Obligation: $29,939,474

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-03-31

Current End Date: 2011-07-31

Potential End Date: 2011-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2014-10-24

More Contracts from General Dynamics-Ots, Inc.

View all General Dynamics-Ots, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending