DoD's $22.5M Logistics Consulting Contract Awarded to General Atomics

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,503,715 ($22.5M)

Contractor: General Atomics

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2008-03-31

End Date: 2009-01-31

Contract Duration: 306 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: HIGHLIGHTER PROGRAM - SUPPORT SERVICES IF/OF

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92128

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $22.5 million to GENERAL ATOMICS for work described as: HIGHLIGHTER PROGRAM - SUPPORT SERVICES IF/OF Key points: 1. Contract awarded for logistics consulting services to support the Army. 2. General Atomics secured the $22.5M contract, with no prior contract history provided. 3. The contract was not competed, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. Services fall under the 'Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services' NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value is $22.5M. Without comparable contract data or a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to assess if this pricing is reasonable or represents good value for the services rendered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition may have limited price discovery and potentially led to a higher cost for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition for a $22.5M contract raises concerns about whether the government achieved the best possible price for these essential logistics consulting services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The specific impact of these logistics services on military operations is not detailed. The duration of the contract (306 days) suggests a focused, short-term need.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • No clear justification for sole-source award
  • Potential for inflated pricing

Positive Signals

  • Specific logistics support for the Army
  • Contract awarded to a known entity (General Atomics)

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under professional services, specifically logistics consulting. Spending in this sector can vary widely depending on agency needs, but competitive procurement is generally expected to ensure value.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine any small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status suggests a potential gap in oversight or a specific justification for bypassing the standard competitive process that is not immediately apparent from the data provided.

Related Government Programs

  • Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of transparency in procurement
  • Potential for cost overruns with T&M pricing
  • No performance metrics provided

Tags

process-physical-distribution-and-logist, department-of-defense, ca, dca, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $22.5 million to GENERAL ATOMICS. HIGHLIGHTER PROGRAM - SUPPORT SERVICES IF/OF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL ATOMICS.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2008-03-31. End: 2009-01-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this $22.5M contract on a sole-source basis without competition?

The provided data indicates the contract was 'NOT COMPETED'. A detailed justification, such as a critical need, lack of qualified sources, or national security imperative, would be required to explain why a competitive process was bypassed for this significant $22.5M award.

What measurable outcomes or improvements in logistics efficiency resulted from this $22.5M contract?

The data does not provide information on the specific deliverables, performance metrics, or achieved outcomes of the logistics consulting services. Understanding the impact and effectiveness of the services is crucial for assessing the value of the $22.5M expenditure.

How does the pricing structure (Time and Materials) for this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar logistics consulting services?

The contract utilized a 'TIME AND MATERIALS' pricing model. Without specific details on labor rates, overhead, and the total hours expended, it is challenging to benchmark against industry standards. This pricing model can also present risks if not closely managed.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesProcess, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SVCS.TECHNICAL REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3550 GENERAL ATOMICS CT, SAN DIEGO, CA, 90

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Federally Funded Research and Development Corp, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,503,715

Exercised Options: $22,503,715

Current Obligation: $22,503,715

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2008-03-31

Current End Date: 2009-01-31

Potential End Date: 2009-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2011-04-18

More Contracts from General Atomics

View all General Atomics federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending