Booz Allen Hamilton awarded $13.8M for Communications-Electronics Support Services by Department of Defense
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,845,115 ($13.8M)
Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-07-28
End Date: 2006-04-30
Contract Duration: 276 days
Daily Burn Rate: $50.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED
Sector: IT
Official Description: 200510!005835!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!W15P7T05F0084! !20050728!20051231!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000011624000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!C!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: MC LEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: 200510!005835!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!W15P7T05F0084! !20050728!20051231!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIR… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. for program management and support services. 2. The contract falls under the Electronics and Communication Equipment category. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract duration was 276 days, indicating a short-term requirement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $13.8M for less than a year of service suggests a potentially high per-unit cost, but without specific deliverables, a precise comparison is difficult. Benchmarking against similar program management contracts is needed.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. The competitive nature of the award is a positive sign for value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive award process likely ensured a reasonable price for the services, minimizing unnecessary taxpayer expenditure for this specific contract.
Public Impact
Department of Defense receives critical communications and electronics support. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. secures a significant contract, contributing to its revenue. Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process for essential government services. The contract supports the Department of the Army's operational capabilities.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Short contract duration may indicate a need for ongoing, potentially more expensive, contract renewals.
- Lack of specific service details makes it hard to assess true value for money.
- High dollar amount for a short period warrants scrutiny of efficiency.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition.
- Clear identification of the contractor and service type.
- Contract aligns with defense sector needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT and Defense sectors, specifically related to program management and support for communications-electronics equipment. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining national security and technological superiority.
Small Business Impact
The award went to Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a large business. There is no indication in the data provided whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if opportunities were specifically set aside for them.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a degree of oversight in the procurement process. However, further details on performance monitoring and accountability mechanisms are not provided.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- High cost for a short duration.
- Lack of detailed service description.
- Potential for follow-on contract dependency.
- Limited insight into small business participation.
Tags
department-of-defense, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.8 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. 200510!005835!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !GS35F0306J !C!N! !Y!W15P7T05F0084! !20050728!20051231!006928857!006928857!006928857!N!BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC !8283 GREENSBORO DRIVE !MCLEAN !VA!22102!48376!059!51!MCLEAN !FAIRFAX !VIRGINIA !+000011624000!N!N!000000000000!R408!PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !541330!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !202
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-07-28. End: 2006-04-30.
What specific program management and support services were rendered for the $13.8M?
The data indicates 'PROGRAM MANAGEMENT/SUPPORT SERVICES' and 'ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP' as the service and product areas. However, the precise nature of these services, such as system integration, maintenance, research, or operational support, is not detailed. Understanding the specific deliverables is crucial for assessing the value and effectiveness of the contract.
How does the per-unit cost compare to similar program management contracts for defense electronics?
Without detailed breakdowns of the services provided and the specific units of measure, a direct per-unit cost comparison is challenging. The contract value of $13.8M over 276 days is substantial. Benchmarking against contracts for similar scope and duration within the Department of Defense is necessary to determine if this represents a fair market price.
What was the impact of the short contract duration on overall program effectiveness?
A contract duration of 276 days (approximately 9 months) suggests a short-term need or a bridge contract. While it provided necessary support, such short durations can sometimes lead to inefficiencies if follow-on contracts are not secured promptly, potentially disrupting program continuity and effectiveness. It may also indicate a pilot program or a specific, time-bound project.
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: NOT REPORTED (NO)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)
Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR # 700, MC LEAN, VA, 90
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS35F0306J
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-07-28
Current End Date: 2006-04-30
Potential End Date: 2006-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-09-16
More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (General Services Administration)
- Transformation Twenty-One Total Technology Next Generation (T4NG) Task Order - Benefits Integrated Delivery — $1.4B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (General Services Administration)
- Product and Technology Ecosystem Management Services (ptems)which Includes Product Delivery and Lifecycle Management to Transform VA by Tapping Into Emerging Technologies, Connecting Developers With VA Data, and Making Human Centered Design (HCD) — $1.1B (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)