DoD awards $189M for Communication Equipment Repair, with General Dynamics as sole source

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,557,438 ($28.6M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-03-25

End Date: 2008-09-26

Contract Duration: 1,281 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.3K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200506!003031!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !W15P7T05CG001 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050325!20060324!188991954!116187758!001381284!N!GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS IN!400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS ROAD!TAUNTON !MA!02780!69170!005!25!TAUNTON !BRISTOL !MASS !+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!J058!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !811213!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !A! !D!Y!U!1!001!N!1A!Z!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !A!A!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: TAUNTON, BRISTOL County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02780

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $28.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: 200506!003031!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !W15P7T05CG001 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050325!20060324!188991954!116187758!001381284!N!GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS IN!400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS ROAD!TAUNTON !MA!02780!69170!005!25!TAUNTON !BRIS… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to General Dynamics C4 Systems Inc. for communication equipment repair and maintenance. 2. The contract value is $188,991,954, with a period of performance from March 2005 to March 2006. 3. This was a sole-source award, raising questions about competition and potential price discovery. 4. The sector is Defense, specifically focusing on IT and communication equipment maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $188,991,954 for communication equipment repair and maintenance appears high given the sole-source nature. Benchmarking against similar contracts is difficult without competitive data.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, indicating a lack of competition. This limits price discovery and may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source award potentially results in higher costs for taxpayers due to the absence of competitive bidding.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have overpaid due to the lack of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense relies on this contract for essential communication equipment maintenance. Lack of transparency in sole-source awards can erode public trust in government contracting.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award limits competition
  • Potential for overpayment
  • Lack of transparency

Positive Signals

  • Essential service for DoD communications

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Defense sector, specifically IT and communication equipment maintenance. Spending benchmarks for similar sole-source repair contracts are difficult to establish due to their nature.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this sole-source contract, which could limit opportunities for them.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award warrants scrutiny to ensure the government received fair value and that the justification for sole-sourcing was robust.

Related Government Programs

  • Communication Equipment Repair and Maintenance
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • Potential for inflated pricing
  • Limited small business participation

Tags

communication-equipment-repair-and-maint, department-of-defense, ma, definitive-contract, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $28.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC.. 200506!003031!2100!W15P7T!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !W15P7T05CG001 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050325!20060324!188991954!116187758!001381284!N!GENERAL DYNAMICS C4 SYSTEMS IN!400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS ROAD!TAUNTON !MA!02780!69170!005!25!TAUNTON !BRISTOL !MASS !+000000500000!N!N!000000000000!J058!MAINT & REPAIR OF EQ/COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT !A7 !ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION EQUIP !000 !* !811213!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS MISSION SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-03-25. End: 2008-09-26.

What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?

The justification for a sole-source award typically involves circumstances where only one responsible source can provide the required supplies or services. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where competition is not feasible. A thorough review of the contract file would be necessary to ascertain the specific rationale provided by the Department of Defense.

How can the government ensure fair pricing when awarding sole-source contracts?

Ensuring fair pricing in sole-source contracts involves rigorous cost analysis, price negotiation, and independent government cost estimates. Agencies should also explore alternative sources or competitive strategies where possible, even if initially perceived as sole-source. Transparency in the negotiation process and post-award audits can further help in verifying cost reasonableness.

What is the long-term impact of relying on sole-source contracts for critical equipment maintenance?

Long-term reliance on sole-source contracts can stifle innovation, reduce competition, and potentially lead to escalating costs. It may also create vendor lock-in, making it difficult to switch providers or adopt new technologies. Over time, this can diminish the government's bargaining power and impact the overall efficiency and cost-effectiveness of its operations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Other Services (except Public Administration)Electronic and Precision Equipment Repair and MaintenanceCommunication Equipment Repair and Maintenance

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 400 JOHN QUINCY ADAMS ROAD, TAUNTON, MA, 02780

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline

Start Date: 2005-03-25

Current End Date: 2008-09-26

Potential End Date: 2008-09-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-05-10

More Contracts from General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Mission Systems, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending