DoD's $30M IT Support Contract with Booz Allen Hamilton Faces Scrutiny Over R&D Classification

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,019,307 ($30.0M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2012-10-01

End Date: 2018-03-31

Contract Duration: 2,007 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: IT SUPPORT SERVICES - LABOR

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: IT SUPPORT SERVICES - LABOR Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for IT Support Services. 2. Significant spending of $30M over a 5.5-year period. 3. Classification under R&D (NAICS 541712) raises questions about appropriateness. 4. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's total value of $30M over 5.5 years is substantial. Benchmarking is difficult due to the unusual classification under R&D for IT support services, which may inflate costs compared to standard IT service contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive process. However, the classification under R&D may have skewed the competitive landscape and price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds may be misallocated if R&D classification is inappropriate for IT support services, potentially leading to higher costs than necessary.

Public Impact

Citizens may question the appropriateness of classifying IT support services under Research and Development. Transparency concerns arise regarding the justification for the R&D classification and its impact on pricing. Potential for inefficient use of taxpayer funds if the contract is not accurately categorized.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Misclassification of service type (IT Support vs. R&D)
  • Potential for inflated costs due to incorrect classification
  • Lack of clarity on specific R&D activities performed

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition
  • Long-term contract providing stable support

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is vast, with significant government spending. However, classifying IT support under R&D (NAICS 541712) is atypical and warrants investigation, as R&D typically focuses on innovation and discovery rather than routine support.

Small Business Impact

The contract data indicates that small businesses were not directly involved as prime contractors (ss: false, sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses participated as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The classification of IT support services under R&D requires further oversight to ensure proper justification and prevent potential misuse of funds. Accountability for the classification decision and its financial implications is crucial.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Information Systems Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential misclassification of service type
  • Questionable justification for R&D NAICS code
  • Risk of inflated costs due to classification
  • Lack of clarity on specific services rendered

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.0 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. IT SUPPORT SERVICES - LABOR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-10-01. End: 2018-03-31.

What specific R&D activities were performed under this contract that justified the NAICS code 541712, and how did this classification impact the bidding and pricing?

The justification for classifying IT support services under NAICS 541712 (Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences) is unclear and appears questionable. Typically, IT support falls under different categories. This misclassification could have distorted the competitive landscape, potentially attracting bidders not specialized in IT support or allowing for higher cost structures associated with R&D projects, ultimately impacting price discovery and taxpayer value.

What are the risks associated with misclassifying IT support services as R&D, particularly concerning cost control and performance metrics?

Misclassifying IT support as R&D poses significant risks. It can lead to inflated costs, as R&D contracts often have different pricing structures and overhead allowances than standard service contracts. Performance metrics may also be misaligned, focusing on research outcomes rather than service level agreements crucial for IT support. This ambiguity can hinder effective oversight and make it difficult to assess true value for money.

How effective was the 'full and open competition' in ensuring the best value for taxpayer dollars, given the potentially inappropriate classification?

While 'full and open competition' is generally a positive indicator for achieving best value, its effectiveness is compromised by the questionable NAICS code classification. The R&D categorization might have deterred specialized IT support firms or encouraged bids based on R&D cost structures, potentially inflating prices. Without a clear understanding of the services rendered and the rationale for the R&D classification, it's difficult to ascertain if the competition truly yielded the most cost-effective IT support solution.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,019,307

Exercised Options: $30,019,307

Current Obligation: $30,019,307

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $1,568,788

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102808D2015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-10-01

Current End Date: 2018-03-31

Potential End Date: 2018-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2023-10-02

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending