DoD's $16.1M R&D Contract Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,100,910 ($16.1M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2009-01-05

End Date: 2012-11-04

Contract Duration: 1,399 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: LABOR TAS::97 0100::TAS

Place of Performance

Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $16.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: LABOR TAS::97 0100::TAS Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. secured the $16.1M contract. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The contract duration was 1399 days, ending in November 2012. 5. The award type was a Delivery Order under a larger contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure can lead to higher costs if not managed tightly. Without specific performance metrics, it's difficult to assess if the final price reflects optimal value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically fosters competitive pricing. However, the specific impact on price discovery for this R&D effort is not detailed.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests efforts to secure fair pricing, but the CPAF structure warrants scrutiny for potential cost overruns impacting taxpayers.

Public Impact

Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) utilized taxpayer funds for R&D. The contract supported research in physical, engineering, and life sciences. Booz Allen Hamilton, a major government contractor, performed the work. The contract concluded in late 2012.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Cost Plus Award Fee structure can incentivize cost growth.
  • Lack of specific performance data makes value assessment difficult.
  • Contract duration is significant, requiring sustained oversight.

Positive Signals

  • Awarded under full and open competition.
  • Contract supports critical R&D for the Department of Defense.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Spending in this area is crucial for technological advancement but requires careful management to ensure efficient use of funds.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific set-aside for small businesses. The prime contractor is Booz Allen Hamilton Inc., a large business entity.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight would have been managed by the Defense Information Systems Agency. The CPAF structure implies performance monitoring and award fee determination, but details on the effectiveness of this oversight are not provided.

Related Government Programs

  • Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Information Systems Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Cost Plus Award Fee structure.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics.
  • Potential for cost overruns.
  • Limited insight into specific R&D outcomes.

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-defense, md, delivery-order, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $16.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. LABOR TAS::97 0100::TAS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2009-01-05. End: 2012-11-04.

What was the specific R&D objective and how did the awarded amount align with expected outcomes?

The contract focused on 'Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)'. Without detailed project goals and deliverables, it's challenging to definitively state if the $16.1M was optimally aligned. The CPAF structure suggests performance-based incentives, but the actual outcomes and their cost-effectiveness are not detailed in the provided data.

Were there any identified risks during the contract performance, and how were they mitigated?

The provided data does not detail specific risks encountered during the contract's performance or the mitigation strategies employed. However, the CPAF structure itself carries inherent risks related to potential cost escalation if performance incentives are not carefully managed and tied to tangible, cost-effective results.

How effective was the full and open competition in driving down costs for this specific R&D effort?

While full and open competition is generally a positive indicator for cost control, its specific effectiveness here is hard to gauge without benchmarks for similar R&D projects. The CPAF payment structure introduces variables beyond initial bid price, making it difficult to isolate the precise cost savings attributable solely to the competitive bidding process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation (UEI: 964725688)

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $16,100,910

Exercised Options: $16,100,910

Current Obligation: $16,100,910

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: HC102808D2015

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2009-01-05

Current End Date: 2012-11-04

Potential End Date: 2012-11-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2017-09-05

More Contracts from Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

View all Booz Allen Hamilton Inc federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending