VA awards $116.8M contract for physician services, highlighting a need for medical specialists
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $116,791,359 ($116.8M)
Contractor: QTC Medical Services Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs
Start Date: 2010-12-31
End Date: 2013-05-01
Contract Duration: 852 days
Daily Burn Rate: $137.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Healthcare
Official Description: MDES
Place of Performance
Location: DIAMOND BAR, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91765, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $116.8 million to QTC MEDICAL SERVICES INC for work described as: MDES Key points: 1. Contract value suggests significant demand for physician services within the VA. 2. The fixed-price contract structure aims to control costs and provide predictability. 3. Sole-source award raises questions about competition and potential for better pricing. 4. Contract duration of over two years indicates a sustained need for these services. 5. Geographic focus on California points to specific regional healthcare demands. 6. The award to QTC Medical Services Inc. suggests a reliance on established providers.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's value of $116.8 million over its period of performance is substantial, indicating a significant need for physician services. Benchmarking this against similar contracts is challenging without more specific service details. However, the fixed-price nature suggests an attempt to manage costs. The absence of a competitive bidding process, as indicated by the award type, may mean that the pricing was not subjected to market pressures, potentially leading to a less favorable value for the government compared to a fully competed contract.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded using a sole-source justification, meaning it was not openly competed. This approach is typically used when only one responsible source is available or capable of meeting the government's needs. The lack of competition means that the Department of Veterans Affairs did not benefit from multiple bids, which could have driven down prices and spurred innovation. The rationale for the sole-source award needs further scrutiny to ensure it was indeed the most appropriate method.
Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can limit taxpayer value by foregoing the cost-saving benefits of a competitive marketplace. This means taxpayers may not be getting the best possible price for these essential physician services.
Public Impact
Veterans in California will benefit from access to essential physician services. The contract ensures the delivery of medical services, potentially improving healthcare outcomes for beneficiaries. The geographic focus on California means that the primary impact will be felt by veterans in that state. The contract supports the employment of physicians and potentially other medical staff within QTC Medical Services Inc.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award limits competitive pricing and potentially increases costs for taxpayers.
- Lack of transparency in the sole-source justification could mask inefficiencies or missed opportunities for savings.
- Contract duration may lock the VA into a specific provider without regular re-evaluation of market alternatives.
Positive Signals
- Award to an established provider like QTC Medical Services Inc. may ensure continuity of care.
- Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the VA, aiding budget management.
- Focus on physician services addresses a critical healthcare need for veterans.
Sector Analysis
The healthcare services sector, particularly within the federal government, is a significant market. This contract falls under the 'Offices of Physicians' category, which is a core component of healthcare delivery. Federal agencies like the VA often rely on a mix of in-house capabilities and contracted services to meet the healthcare needs of their beneficiaries. Spending in this area is driven by the demand for specialized medical expertise and the need to supplement existing government medical facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific types of physician services procured.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. The award to a single, likely larger, entity suggests that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to fully assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's terms and conditions, including performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is often limited with sole-source awards, as the justification and negotiation process may not be publicly detailed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.
Related Government Programs
- VA Medical Care Programs
- Physician and Surgeon Services Contracts
- Healthcare Services for Federal Agencies
- Medical Examination Services
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award may limit price competition.
- Lack of detailed service scope hinders value assessment.
- Potential for contractor complacency due to lack of competition.
Tags
healthcare, va, physician-services, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, medical-services, california, large-contract, professional-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $116.8 million to QTC MEDICAL SERVICES INC. MDES
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is QTC MEDICAL SERVICES INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $116.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2010-12-31. End: 2013-05-01.
What specific physician services are covered under this $116.8 million contract?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)' under NAICS code 621111. However, the specific types of physician services are not detailed. This could range from general medical examinations to specialized consultations. Understanding the exact scope is crucial for assessing value and performance. Without this detail, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts or determine if the pricing is appropriate for the services rendered. Further documentation would be needed to clarify the precise medical specialties and services included in this substantial award.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis?
The data explicitly states the contract type is 'sole-source'. Sole-source awards are typically justified when only one vendor is capable of meeting the requirement, often due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where competition is impractical. For this VA contract, the specific justification is not provided. Common reasons might include the contractor possessing unique qualifications, existing infrastructure, or a critical role in ongoing VA healthcare operations that cannot be easily replicated by others. A thorough review of the sole-source justification documentation would be necessary to understand the rationale and assess if it was appropriate and in the government's best interest.
How does the $116.8 million contract value compare to historical VA spending on similar physician services?
The $116.8 million contract value represents a significant investment by the VA in physician services. To compare this to historical spending, one would need to analyze previous contracts for similar services, adjusting for inflation and changes in scope. The NAICS code 621111 ('Offices of Physicians') is broad, so identifying truly comparable contracts would require examining specific service lines, geographic areas, and contract durations. Without access to detailed historical spending data and contract specifics, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the magnitude of this award suggests a sustained and substantial need for these services within the VA system, particularly in the region served.
What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award of this magnitude?
Sole-source awards of this magnitude carry several risks. Primarily, the lack of competition can lead to higher prices than might be achieved through a competitive bidding process, resulting in reduced value for taxpayer dollars. There's also a risk of complacency from the awarded contractor, as they face no immediate competitive pressure to innovate or improve service quality. Furthermore, it can create a barrier to entry for other potential providers who might offer better or more cost-effective solutions. Ensuring robust oversight and performance management becomes even more critical to mitigate these risks and ensure the VA receives optimal value and service quality.
What performance metrics or oversight mechanisms are likely in place for this contract?
While specific performance metrics are not detailed in the provided data, contracts of this size and nature typically include stringent performance standards. These often cover aspects like appointment wait times, quality of care, patient satisfaction, documentation accuracy, and adherence to VA protocols. Oversight would likely involve dedicated contract officers, program managers within the VA, and potentially site visits or audits. The fixed-price nature of the contract incentivizes the contractor to meet these standards efficiently. Regular performance reviews and reporting requirements would be standard to ensure accountability and address any deficiencies promptly.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Offices of Physicians › Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)
Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › NURSING, NURSING HOME, EVAL/SCREEN
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Lockheed Martin Corp (UEI: 834951691)
Address: 21700 COPLEY DR STE 200, DIAMOND BAR, CA, 91765
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $119,681,628
Exercised Options: $119,681,628
Current Obligation: $116,791,359
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: VA79811D0003
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2010-12-31
Current End Date: 2013-05-01
Potential End Date: 2013-05-01 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-05-17
More Contracts from QTC Medical Services Inc
- FY26 Funding Medical Disability Examinations — $754.3M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- MDE FY24 Funding Task Order - Subject to the Availability of Funds — $700.5M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- Medical Disability Examinations (mdes) Under Section 504 of the Veterans Benefits Improvements ACT of 1996 (public LAW 104 275 38 U.S.C. 5101), Region 2 (southeast) - Modification to Exercised Option 4 — $436.6M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- FY26 Funding Medical Disability Examinations — $392.7M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
- FY24 Funding Task Order — $355.0M (Department of Veterans Affairs)
Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts
- CCN Region 3 Express Report — $5.2B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Express Report for FY22 Region 2 — $5.1B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Fiscal Year 2022 Express Report for Region 1 — $4.2B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)
- Express Report for the Patient Centered Community Care (PC3) Contract — $3.3B (Triwest Healthcare Alliance Corp)
- CCN Region Three FY21 Express Report — $3.1B (Optum Public Sector Solutions, Inc.)