VA Spends $10.2M on Rehabilitation Survey and Publications Over 10 Years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $10,210,835 ($10.2M)

Contractor: Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2007-06-01

End Date: 2017-05-31

Contract Duration: 3,652 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: REHABILITATION SURVEY AND PUBLICATIONS

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20420

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $10.2 million to COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF REHABILITATION FACILITIES for work described as: REHABILITATION SURVEY AND PUBLICATIONS Key points: 1. The contract awarded to the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF) for rehabilitation survey and publications totaled $10.2 million. 2. This was a firm-fixed-price definitive contract spanning a decade (2007-2017). 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition. 4. The primary agency was the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). 5. The NAICS code 611710 indicates Educational Support Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The $10.2 million expenditure over 10 years averages to approximately $1 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for rehabilitation survey and publication services, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a predictable cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offering.

Taxpayer Impact: The firm-fixed-price contract provided cost certainty for the VA, and competitive bidding likely ensured a reasonable price for the taxpayer over the contract's long duration.

Public Impact

Veterans benefit from accredited rehabilitation facilities, ensuring quality of care and services. The publications likely disseminate best practices and standards within the rehabilitation field. Taxpayers funded a significant, long-term contract for essential support services to the VA.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Long contract duration (10 years) may limit flexibility and opportunities for cost savings through re-competition.
Lack of specific performance metrics or outcome data makes it hard to assess the true value delivered.
PSC code is blank, hindering detailed categorization and analysis of spending.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Long-term commitment may indicate a stable and essential service for the VA.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls under Educational Support Services (NAICS 611710). Spending in this sector can vary widely depending on the specific services procured. This contract represents a substantial, long-term investment by the VA in accreditation and related publications.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further investigation would be needed to determine small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Veterans Affairs. Oversight would typically involve contract management officials ensuring compliance with terms and conditions, and monitoring performance against deliverables.

Related Government Programs

Educational Support Services
Department of Veterans Affairs Contracting
Department of Veterans Affairs Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration without clear re-competition points.
Lack of detailed performance metrics.
Potential for vendor lock-in over a decade.
Limited insight into specific deliverables and their impact.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $10.2 million to COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF REHABILITATION FACILITIES. REHABILITATION SURVEY AND PUBLICATIONS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF REHABILITATION FACILITIES.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $10.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-06-01. End: 2017-05-31.

What was the specific scope of 'Rehabilitation Survey and Publications' services procured under this contract, and how did it align with VA's mission?

The contract likely involved the accreditation process for rehabilitation facilities, including surveys and the development/dissemination of related publications. This aligns with the VA's mission to provide comprehensive care to veterans, ensuring that facilities offering rehabilitation services meet established quality standards through accreditation.

Given the 10-year duration, were there opportunities missed to re-evaluate the service provider or pricing for potential cost savings?

A 10-year contract duration, while providing stability, can sometimes lead to missed opportunities for cost savings if market prices decrease or service needs evolve. Regular contract reviews or break clauses could mitigate this, but without specific contract details, it's hard to say if such provisions were in place.

How effectively did the services provided by CARF contribute to improving the quality of rehabilitation services available to veterans?

The effectiveness is implied by the VA's continued engagement with CARF over a decade. CARF accreditation is a recognized standard for quality in rehabilitation services, suggesting that facilities meeting these standards provide better care. However, direct metrics linking this specific contract to improved veteran outcomes are not provided.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Educational Support Services › Educational Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4891 E GRANT RD, TUCSON, AZ, 85712

Business Categories: Category Business, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $10,210,835

Exercised Options: $10,210,835

Current Obligation: $10,210,835

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Timeline