DoD Awards $25.6M for IT Support to General Dynamics, Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,643,800 ($25.6M)

Contractor: General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-09-27

End Date: 2012-08-25

Contract Duration: 698 days

Daily Burn Rate: $36.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: SPAWAR SYSTEMS CENTER ATLANTIC, CODE 562, INFORMATION SYSTEM (IS) DEVELOPMENT, INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT; ACQUISITION LOGISTICS SUPPORT; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM) SUPPORT; SYSTEM SAFETY ENGINEERING SUPPORT; AND ENGINEERING, SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND PROCESS ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR THE NSA/CSS GEORGIA (NSAG) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE (ITD).

Place of Performance

Location: NORTH CHARLESTON, CHARLESTON County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29419, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: South Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: SPAWAR SYSTEMS CENTER ATLANTIC, CODE 562, INFORMATION SYSTEM (IS) DEVELOPMENT, INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT; ACQUISITION LOGISTICS SUPPORT; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM) SUPPORT; SYSTEM SAFETY ENGINEERING SUPPORT; AND ENGINEERING, SYSTEM ENGI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded to General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. for IT support services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this acquisition. 3. The contract has a duration of 698 days. 4. Services include IS development, IA, IT support, acquisition logistics, and engineering. 5. The contract value is $25.6 million.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract is a Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) type, which can allow for cost overruns if not managed carefully. However, the fixed fee component provides some cost control.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government. Multiple bidders likely participated, driving competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition suggests an effort to secure the best value for taxpayer dollars through a competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Ensures continued IT support for NSA/CSS Georgia, crucial for national security operations. Supports critical functions like information assurance and system engineering. Provides employment opportunities within the IT and engineering sectors. The contract's duration suggests a need for sustained, long-term support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • CPFF contract type can lead to cost growth if not closely monitored.
  • Specific performance metrics and quality assurance details are not provided.

Positive Signals

  • Full and open competition ensures a competitive bidding process.
  • Contract supports critical national security IT infrastructure.
  • Multiple contract line items indicate comprehensive service requirements.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), specifically focusing on IT and information assurance. Spending in this sector is significant, driven by the need for specialized technical expertise in government IT modernization and cybersecurity.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB=false) and was awarded to a large business (General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.). Therefore, there is no direct small business participation indicated in this prime contract award.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of the Navy, indicating oversight from a major defense agency. Further oversight would typically involve program management reviews and contract performance monitoring by the contracting officer's representative.

Related Government Programs

  • Engineering Services
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

  • Potential for cost overruns due to CPFF structure.
  • Lack of specific performance metrics in award data.
  • Contract duration is relatively short for complex IT systems.
  • No indication of small business subcontracting goals.

Tags

engineering-services, department-of-defense, sc, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.6 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC.. SPAWAR SYSTEMS CENTER ATLANTIC, CODE 562, INFORMATION SYSTEM (IS) DEVELOPMENT, INFORMATION ASSURANCE (IA) AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT; ACQUISITION LOGISTICS SUPPORT; CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT (CM) SUPPORT; SYSTEM SAFETY ENGINEERING SUPPORT; AND ENGINEERING, SYSTEM ENGINEERING AND PROCESS ENGINEERING SUPPORT FOR THE NSA/CSS GEORGIA (NSAG) INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DIRECTORATE (ITD).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-09-27. End: 2012-08-25.

What is the expected impact of the CPFF contract type on the final cost compared to a firm-fixed-price contract, assuming similar performance?

A Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract allows the contractor to recover all allowable costs plus a predetermined fixed fee. If costs are higher than anticipated, the total price will increase, whereas a Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP) contract would maintain the agreed-upon price regardless of cost fluctuations. This can lead to higher final costs under CPFF if not managed diligently, but it also allows for flexibility in scope changes.

How does the utilization of full and open competition mitigate risks associated with sole-source or limited competition awards in this IT support context?

Full and open competition mitigates risks by introducing multiple qualified vendors, fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices and encourages innovation. This process reduces the risk of overpaying, receiving substandard services, or facing vendor lock-in, which are common concerns with sole-source or limited competition contracts, especially in rapidly evolving IT fields.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of the IT support provided under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Effectiveness is typically measured through metrics related to system uptime, response times for issue resolution, successful implementation of security protocols, adherence to project timelines, and overall user satisfaction. These KPIs would be detailed in the contract's performance work statement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: N0002410R3364

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: General Dynamics Corp (UEI: 001381284)

Address: 3211 JERMANTOWN RD, FAIRFAX, VA, 22030

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $70,494,274

Exercised Options: $26,912,964

Current Obligation: $25,643,800

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2010-09-27

Current End Date: 2012-08-25

Potential End Date: 2015-08-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2016-10-05

More Contracts from General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc.

View all General Dynamics Information Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending