DoD's Navy Awards $26M Engineering Services Contract to BearingPoint, Inc. via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,073,175 ($26.1M)
Contractor: Bearingpoint, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2011-09-28
End Date: 2013-08-29
Contract Duration: 701 days
Daily Burn Rate: $37.2K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THIS ACQUISITION WILL BE TO PERFORM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NETWORK MODELING AND SIMULATION, TEST AND EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT AND VALIDATION, TECHNICAL TRAINING, EXERCISE AND DEMONSTRATION SUPPORT, TECHNICAL TRAINING/PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, AND COORDINATION FOR IMAGERY AND VIDEO PROJECTS
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20001, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.1 million to BEARINGPOINT, INC. for work described as: THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THIS ACQUISITION WILL BE TO PERFORM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NETWORK MODELING AND SIMULATION, TEST AND EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT AND VALIDATION, TECHNICAL TRAINING, EXERCISE AND DEMONSTRATION S… Key points: 1. Contract focuses on extensive systems engineering, software development, and technical support services. 2. Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract value of $26M is moderate for the scope of services. 4. Services are critical for naval operations and technological advancement.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $26M for a 701-day duration appears reasonable given the broad scope of engineering and technical services. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering support contracts would provide a clearer picture of value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded using full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to compete. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and ensures the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award suggests that taxpayer funds are being utilized efficiently through a market-driven pricing approach.
Public Impact
Enhances naval technological capabilities through advanced engineering and software development. Supports critical defense operations requiring specialized technical expertise. Potential for innovation in imagery and video project coordination.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of specific performance metrics in provided data.
- Potential for cost overruns with Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type.
- Limited visibility into the specific technical challenges and risks.
Positive Signals
- Awarded via full and open competition.
- Broad scope of services indicates comprehensive support.
- Experienced contractor likely to deliver quality services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, which is crucial for government operations, particularly in defense. Spending benchmarks for similar large-scale engineering and technical support contracts can vary significantly based on complexity and duration.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses and was awarded to BearingPoint, Inc. There is no information provided on small business subcontracting participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically be managed by the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. Ensuring adherence to contract terms and performance standards is key to accountability.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Broad scope may present challenges in defining and measuring specific performance outcomes.
- Reliance on a single contractor for extensive services increases risk if performance falters.
- Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined and controlled.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.1 million to BEARINGPOINT, INC.. THE PRIMARY FOCUS OF THIS ACQUISITION WILL BE TO PERFORM SYSTEMS ENGINEERING, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCE, ENGINEERING AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, NETWORK MODELING AND SIMULATION, TEST AND EVALUATION, ASSESSMENT AND VALIDATION, TECHNICAL TRAINING, EXERCISE AND DEMONSTRATION SUPPORT, TECHNICAL TRAINING/PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT, AND COORDINATION FOR IMAGERY AND VIDEO PROJECTS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BEARINGPOINT, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2011-09-28. End: 2013-08-29.
What is the specific breakdown of costs within the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure, and how does it align with the expected effort?
The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure means the contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee representing profit. Without a detailed breakdown, it's difficult to assess if the fixed fee is commensurate with the complexity and risk involved. Further analysis would require access to the contract's cost proposal and fee determination.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will contractor performance be measured against them?
Key performance indicators are essential for evaluating contractor success and ensuring mission objectives are met. The provided data lacks specific KPIs. Effective oversight requires clearly defined metrics related to systems engineering, software development, and technical support delivery, along with a robust process for performance monitoring and feedback.
How does the scope of 'coordination for imagery and video projects' integrate with the broader systems engineering and software development efforts?
The integration of imagery and video project coordination with core engineering functions suggests a need for multimedia data management and analysis capabilities. Understanding this synergy is crucial for assessing the contract's overall effectiveness in supporting advanced naval intelligence and operational awareness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: N0002411R3487
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1676 INTERNATIONAL DRIVE, MCLEAN, VA, 22102
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $29,954,209
Exercised Options: $28,937,137
Current Obligation: $26,073,175
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4020
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2011-09-28
Current End Date: 2013-08-29
Potential End Date: 2013-08-29 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2016-10-05
More Contracts from Bearingpoint, Inc.
- Foreign Assistance Program — $635.5M (Agency for International Development)
- Foreign Assistance Program — $203.3M (Agency for International Development)
- 200412!V00204!1700!BY006 !navsea Washington DC !N0002404C6322 !A!N! !Y! ! !20040927!20070930!014097146!014097146!014097146!n!bearingpoint, Inc !1676 International Drive !mclean !va!22102!01600!003!24!annapolis !anne Arundel !maryland !+000023736305!n!n!000176700000!ad23!rdte/Services-Adv Tech DEV !S1 !services !000 !* !519190!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!b!e!y!b! !d!n!v!1!001!n!1g!c!y!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !z!z!a!a!000!a!d!n! ! !Y! ! !N00024!0001! ! — $126.2M (Department of Defense)
- Programmatic Support for the Peo-Eis — $42.9M (Department of Defense)
- Nmci and Business Process Management Support Services — $42.3M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)